- Apr 19, 2012
- 33,072
- 6,488
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
the ONLY government programs were based on either age OR whether or not YOU PERSONALLY served in the armed forces?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
no yes I was born with Cerebral-Palsy, but two problems number one people abuse the system will always ( we are NOT talking numbers here just fact that SOME abuse the system. Also this way it would not be need-based which means it would be easier for the government. You either have reached your 65th birthday or you have not. You either at some time in your signed a contract to serve or you never did. There would be very little need to check up on that.Because it's your own fault if you're born with Cerebral-Palsy‎.
![]()
no yes I was born with Cerebral-Palsy, but two problems number one people abuse the system will always ( we are NOT talking numbers here just fact that SOME abuse the system. Also this way it would not be need-based which means it would be easier for the government. You either have reached your 65th birthday or you have not. You either at some time in your signed a contract to serve or you never did. There would be very little need to check up on that.
Well maybe not but it is a whole lot easier. For example, until my dad died almost two months ago I was on on SSI now that is a NEED-BASED program. Meaning that periodalicly I had to go and they would check up on me. Well EVEN under penalty of purjury if I lied they would have to find out. As opposed to my grandparents 78 ( turning 79 Sunday and 76) well, Social security is not need-based meaning that other than for tax purposes it is none of the government's business how much my grandfather brings in with his business he still maintains. This would mean that the government would not have to spend NEAR as much time waiting for people to report abuse. Plus, quite frankly people would be more likely to do so as most people HATE when people fake age or service.Collective punishment is not as realistic answer.
And age and/or service do not mean that abuse doesn't happen by those of said age and/or service.
Why not?If it was easy, we wouldn't need a government.
so then what is wrong with dirt roads? Plus we are talking about government assistance here. That is things like food stamps, section 8 medicade.I don't have time to pave the roads myself.
so then what is wrong with dirt roads? Plus we are talking about government assistance here. That is things like food stamps, section 8 medicade.
I don't have time to fill all the ruts myself.
He failed the emissions inspection.
I am no longer on a need based program . I wish I were, but I cannot change that. Surviorship benefits are not need based.You want to return to the 1800's?
Aren't you on government assistance?
because that is part of the contract. Honest question too how can the military be given TOO admiration?Why military?
We are already in a situation where the military is given far too much admiration. It is insane to push that farther.
Actually, the New Deal passed in the 30s AFTER the great depression. This tells me that people lived before that without government benefits.
Well, keep in mind people still die. It is a little thing called mortality no matter how much assistance there is or is not.And suffered without them. And died without them.