Wow. Just wow. What a great post.For someone who is "not trying to change anyone opinion" you seem to have spent a great deal of time doing just that. I understand that your viewpoint is backed by personal experience but you could just as easily be a person saying: "At 14, I had only ever done what I was told to do and when I got pregnant I was told there was no choice, I was going to have a daughter. After my parents kicked me out, I started drinking and I moved in with a physical abusive man to survive, and I took that out on my child - beating it and breaking bones which resulted in the child being taken away by family services I can now say that......."
The problem is that as much as people against abortion would like to make this into an absolutely crystal clear situation - it isn't - How can you ask a person to "go back" to being a bunch of split DNA strands which haven't even created organs yet, much less a brain - you might as well be asking people to "go back" to being a carbon atom or a sperm. If you want to talk about "responsibility" then why not address why it is that the US is the number one per captia western country with unwanted pregnancies. And why is it when countries like the UK have 6,000 children up for adoption, when EU countries have so few children up for adoption people (including Canadians) are trying to get US children, of whom there is over 1/2 million waiting to be adopted - but they aren't the right age, or colour, or from the right background, or have the physical conditions to make them "desirable" - Is the US as a "Christian" country going to be "responsible"?
And then we get to the incredibly high rate of rape, sexual abuse and incest - which will occur to around 400,000 US women THIS YEAR ALONE. Currently, most states have what is known as an "incest clause" which means that if you are raped by your father or sibling, then they will serve little to no time at all (for the good of the family) - you can go to RAAIN or other sites if you wish to learn more - but yet, I don't see groups of protest lead from Christian organizations outside governor mansions holding up signs with pictures of 8, 9 and 11 year old girls, blood pouring out of thier ripped genetalia - nor, when presenting these cases is the question of rape and incest generally considered at all - if we are to talk about RESPONSIBILITY - do we want little girls to make sure that "daddy's" baby is brought to term? Well, apparently the good christian folks in South Dakota do find it crystal clear - since thier criminalization of abortion criminalizes women who are raped and victims of incest right along with anyone else (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/22/AR2006022202424.html).
The problem is that the whole subject's taboo nature makes it so that we have a nation which is avoiding responsibility by not addressing the problem in it's entirety - where groups and (depending who is in power) semi-government agencies say that God wants those divided cells to become a child, regardless - yet does not ensure that the woman in that position is secure for the next 9 months, has enough to eat for the next 9 months, is able to physically or emotionally take care of themselves much less an infant nor are currently willing to step in and ensure a standard quality of life for all these infants they have fought so hard to have be born in the first place - a policy which tells 2 day old babies, "Hey I got you here, it's all up to you now" is either one which is playing "See no evil; take no responsibility", is one that is calloused and carrying more about being "right" than actual humans or just a combination of naive and willing ignorance.
If an angel showed up and told me I was going to be a fetus to prove some sort of point to people - I would tell the angel to grow up and spend a little more time helping out the wretched lives of the children who were already here first.
Upvote
0
