Laureate
whatisthebaytreeknown4? What's debate reknown for?
- Jan 18, 2012
- 1,558
- 425
- 63
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Single
As you're aware your definition of Oral Law is not the traditional understanding of the Oral Law of Rabbinic Judaism.
What do you make of Messianic Jews that believe the Oral Law of Rabbinic Judaism is worth studying to better understand the Oral Law of the (re-)New(-ed) Covenant.
Care to Comment
Well, my definition actually establishes the premise of their definition, for they (who were faithful) sat in, and perpetuated the Seat of Mosʰé;
Îyéhûʷəʰ made the Verbal/Oral Covenant available to those who were not too afraid to hear His Voice, which said 'fear' prompted the children of Israel to request to Not Hear His Voice;
To which the Levitical priesthood was established in Addition to the Aaroni priesthood, serving under the Aaroni priesthood;
They were Anointed Saints, Living Oracles everyone of them, yet as Elohym said, when he speaks to Mosʰé he speaks open, and plainly, but to everyone else through a Vision, in a dream, with a twofold utterance, and it was the priest who like lawyers were drafted to expound upon these equations of the Written Law;
But seeing how the Levitical priesthood was predicated on Fear, and a request to Not Hear the Voice of Elohym, it stands to reason that where there is no longer Fear, there is also no longer the need of the Levitical;
Remember, the entire nation of Israel was invited to be a Priestly Nation, and it was their Fear of the Voice that circumvented everyone but the ordained priests, and later the (Spiritually born again) Jews;
This Anointing (though it is infallible), it has never made anyone's Heart infallible, therefore there is still room for Pride/the Ego to swoop in and attempt to steal the Glory.
Upvote
0