I
I also think that the ideal you describe of no longer living for ourselves but instead living for God is an impossible ideal which no one has come close to living out.
Absolutely not true.
We are all selfishly motivated. Many people use Jesus or God as a part of what they would call their "identity". In fact, I would say that if you were to ask any Christian what defines them they would probably say God or Jesus along with a variety of other things (occupation, ethnicity, etc).
Which is why we are told we are to be Slaves to Christ. A Slave is one who puts the will of His master over that of his own. It just so happens that our Master wishes are better for us, than what we wish for ourselves.
No, I don't. What are the verses?
The principle explained:
New American Standard Bible (NASB)
Luke17
22 And He said to the disciples,
(W)The days will come when you will long to see one of the days of the Son of Man, and you will not see it.
23 (X)They will say to you, Look there! Look here! Do not go away, and do not run after
them.
24 (Y)For just like the lightning, when it flashes out of one part
[p]of the sky, shines to the other part
[q]of the sky, so will the Son of Man be in His day.
25 (Z)But first He must suffer many things and be rejected by this generation.
26 (AA)And just as it happened
(AB)in the days of Noah, so it will be also in the days of the Son of Man:
27 they were eating, they were drinking, they were marrying, they were being given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all.
28 [r]It was the same as happened in
(AC)the days of Lot: they were eating, they were drinking, they were buying, they were selling, they were planting, they were building;
29 but on the day that Lot went out from Sodom it rained fire and
[s]brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all.
30 It will be
[t]just the same on the day that the Son of Man
(AD)is revealed.
31 On that day, the one who is
(AE)on the housetop and whose goods are in the house must not go down to take them out; and likewise the one who is in the field must not turn back.
32 (AF)Remember Lots wife.
33 (AG)Whoever seeks to keep his
[u]life will lose it, and whoever loses
his life will preserve it.
Are you advocating that we give up the Self in order to commune with the Whole (God)?
Yes
How do you go about doing that?
The process often starts with identifying what in the persons life he holds most dear, and then he has to reconcile it with our greatest command. After which a decision has to be made on whether the position of "Most dear in one's heart" will be awarded to God or will you keep whatever is currently there.
This is another offshoot: Christianity doesn't have a very good description of the method or process that leads to this God-filled life.
Because it is not a check list process.
I find that Eastern religions such as Buddhism have very well-defined practices and processes and stages that get you from your selfish, desire-filled self to commune with the Whole (for all intents and purposes: God). Buddhism's main methodology is meditation. I feel that Christianity's main methodology is prayer. I feel as though prayer and meditation are two manifestations of the same thing.
I grew up in Buddhist House hold (Seon,) and i can certainly say they are not. If your prayer is like trying to center yourself in meditation then you do not understand the concept of Prayer. Luke 11 gives us a model of prayer. Very little of which centers on one self nor does it have to do with personal enlightenment.
yes
5 Then He said to them,
[d]Suppose one of you has a friend, and goes to him at midnight and says to him, Friend, lend me three loaves;
6 for a friend of mine has come to me from a journey, and I have nothing to set before him;
7 and from inside he answers and says, Do not bother me; the door has already been shut and my children
[e]and I are in bed; I cannot get up and give you
anything.
8 I tell you, even though he will not get up and give him
anything because he is his friend, yet
(D)because of his
[f]persistence he will get up and give him as much as he needs.
9 So I say to you,
[g](E)ask, and it will be given to you;
[h]seek, and you will find;
[i]knock, and it will be opened to you.
10 For everyone who asks, receives; and he who seeks, finds; and to him who knocks, it will be opened.
11 Now
[j]suppose one of you fathers is asked by his son for a
[k]fish; he will not give him a snake instead of a fish, will he?
12 Or
if he is asked for an egg, he will not give him a scorpion, will he?
13 (F)If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will
your [l]heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask Him?
How long did the neighbor knock? what was the time frame given? Or rather what happened in order for him to stop knocking?
On what?
The way you're talking makes me think I'm trying to reach some sort of Enlightenment.
Nope. What I am pointing you towards, is a personal Measure of the Holy Spirit of God to help you direct your life.
So I have to reject everything about myself in order to follow God?
Yep.
Again, I see no evidence that any Christian has accomplished this.
The bible is full of such examples.
The closest thing I've seen to selfless people have been some Eastern mystics in the Himalayas, and they were Buddhist!
It is because you are looking for "selfless people" in Christianity rather than looking for someone who has
died to self, and is living for Christ. Christianity is not a religion devoted to selflessness Because we are to emulate Christ, and Christ Himself was not selfless. He did what He did for a very specific purpose. And all of what was done was for the greater Glory of God. Selflessness still points to the person performing the act. Often times a "selfless act" is it's own reward. While acts that glorify God do just that, no matter what or how other people judge the act being performed.
That is why it was OK or even deemed Good that men of God slay every man woman and Child of a given people, or why it is/was OK to own a slave and so on. Selflessness is not the ultimate goal, because Selflessness is still a form of people/self worship. In that your god or your morality is determined by those who judge your works to be "good" or selfless.
While Service to God does require a measure of selflessness, it is not always easy to identify it as such.
This seems like an impossible ideal to achieve and Christianity has a very poor methodology.
That is a good thing because Christianity is not a Method made religion. Christianity is merely a means to an end. the End being an eternal relationship with God.
Christianity says, "You just do it!"
Actually no. Christianity says: It's Done, just accept it. For there is noting one can "Do" to earn the Righteousness that Christ offers.
At least Buddhism recognizes the extreme hardship, concentration, focus and practice it would require through monastic meditation to achieve such a thing.
why do you think that is?
Because the religion in of itself is the ultimate goal or the ultimate expression of Faith. While Christianity is just a stepping stone. There are few fixed points in Christianity for that reason.
If God is truly loving and forgiving then yes He would.

So the God of the Universe has to be loving and forgiving to your understanding of these terms in order to indeed be a Loving and forgiving God? Now what if He defined the boundaries of His love and forgiveness, and your understanding of precepts did not conform to His? Which party is obligated to redefine their definitions? Why?
Commands by an all-loving and all-forgiving God have no meaning because if you break them, he's all-loving and all-forgiving...
Can you give book chapter and verse that describes God this way?
Note: I've kind of equated Buddhist-style "Enlightenment" with "Relationship with God" in this post because the way you were saying things seemed to naturally draw the analogy.
I can see why you would do this if you did not understand the two terms being discussed
-Or-
Drawing parallels between the core beliefs of Christianity and the Core beliefs of Buddhism allows you a way to easily refute the merits of legitimate self sacrifice when paired with and easily dismissed expression of faith.
If this was the intended purpose of your reply, your going to have to do better or pick a more obscure religion to try and dismiss the part of Christianity you are finding so hard to accept, because Bottom Line is if you are indeed looking to become a Christian. you will have to Die to your selfish wants and desires and will have to Learn to live for Christ. With all of your Heart, Mind, Spirit, and Strength. If you feel you can not do this but know you need to then with all that you have been given ask God to help you make the transition.