Bushido216
Well-Known Member
- Aug 30, 2003
- 6,383
- 210
- 39
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Engaged
- Politics
- US-Democrat
That being said, in bricklayer's defense, what he's saying is actually fairly articulate.
What he's suggesting is that our freedom of will isn't necessary. Instead, it is contingent on the freedom of will of God. So, while our wills are free to do this or that, that is only the case because God provides the necessary conditions. In other words, our free will relies on God, rather than being constrained by Him.
That's the argument you should be arguing for or against.
What he's suggesting is that our freedom of will isn't necessary. Instead, it is contingent on the freedom of will of God. So, while our wills are free to do this or that, that is only the case because God provides the necessary conditions. In other words, our free will relies on God, rather than being constrained by Him.
That's the argument you should be arguing for or against.
Upvote
0