Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
oworm said:1CO 1:2 To the church of God in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus and called to be holy,
Eph 1:4 For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight.
HEB 12:14 Make every effort to live in peace with all men and to be holy;
1Pet1:15 But just as he who called you is holy, so be holy in all you do; 16 for it is written: "Be holy, because I am holy."
Rom6:22 But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves to God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life
2CO 7:1 Since we have these promises, dear friends, let us purify ourselves from everything that contaminates body and spirit, perfecting holiness out of reverence for God.
Seems Holiness is very much a part of the new testament code!!
James Sez said:To get back to the original question about us liberals. I think a liberal is someone who would hopefully think before they cast the first stone. Many of the conservatives on here are so busy stoning people in the name of Jesus, that it seems it would be impossible for them to even hear Jesus ask the question. Yea, I know, liberals cast stones too, but why don't you conservatives show and teach us liberal apostates the correct way to handle those with whom we disagree-lead the way. You only portray Jesus the judge and forget that He hung with those whom you so readily condemn, those of us who are not as perfect and Godly as you.
Sorry seebs, we need some BIBLE in here so that we don't miss the point:seebs said:The point of that story is that the people you hate the most, well, if one of them is a good person, then he is more your neighbor than members of the groups you "accept".
Diversity? I see the parable leading to a standard of true righteouness based upon being rooted in Christ to ACT in faith - a UNIFIED, singular faith - not a diverse faith; although diverse in race, gender, social status, etc., yes. But these are all one on Christ, if they are in Christ, they are no longer diverse.That's diversity. If you want to understand that story fully, imagine that it was told in Georgia shortly after the Civil war, and that it was called "the parable of the good Negro". That'll get you close to how much the audience hated and despised the Samaritans, but it still falls a bit short.
The ENTIRE CHAPTER of John 17 refutes the idea that God wants diversity. The only comparable diversity created by God of any measure was at Babel, and that was not a nessecarily good thing.God wants diversity. We know this because He created diversity. He didn't stop after the first person; we're like potato chips that way.
The Law:Yes, and He also forbids the Jews from wearing mixed fabrics, or eating shellfish.
Negative. This is absolutely incorrect. oworm correctly portrayed that a few posts back.We came past the holiness code. It is no longer part of our faith.
Not entirely true, the law was set to make a distinction of what was clean/unclean:In the Old Testament, contact with unclean things made you unclean. In the New Testament, contact with unclean things purifies them.
Buck72 said:Sorry seebs, we need some BIBLE in here so that we don't miss the point:
Where does this "good person" standard come from? My Bible tells me that there is nothing good about me, and that apart from Christ I can do nothing, that my very salvation is to His glory.
Where do people get the idea that sharing the word of God is "throwing stones"?Janine said:This post touched my heart it is so true.
Im a fairly new Christian and when I say or do something that a conservative Christian does not like they usually get angry and throw a ton of scriptures at you, get uptight then shun you, why are some of them so miserable? If you say something wrong why cant they be more loving in their correction? I think most people will listen to them if they are.
My message to them is to stop throwing stones at people who make mistakes in life and start throwing a bit of love,compassion and understanding, thats what I believe Jesus wants us to do.
oworm said:Seems Holiness is very much a part of the new testament code!!
Buck72 said:Where do people get the idea that sharing the word of God is "throwing stones"?
Who are "we" referring to that needs discernment? Sounds like the same run-around I find in the creation/evolution forums when Christians want to discredit the messenger regarding the message.seebs said:Maybe we should use some discernment, and the guidance of the Spirit.
Rom 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,No. The Bible says that God's creation is good. Some human teachers wrongly claim that there is "nothing" good about people, by interpreting as literal fact claims of rhetoric and hyperbole.
I've read it many times, GREAT chapter! I've been convicted many times too bro! We could all use a little more love.seebs said:They don't. What's throwing stones is taking favorite prooftexts and bashing people with them. That's not sharing the word of God.
If you're not sure, try this simple test: Before you quote part of the Bible, read 1 Corinthians 13. Read it straight through, beginning to end.
After doing this, ask yourself; "is what I am about to do charitable?"
It will work wonders.
Buck72 said:Who are "we" referring to that needs discernment? Sounds like the same run-around I find in the creation/evolution forums when Christians want to discredit the messenger regarding the message.
If the Bible verses I've shared do not mesh with the Spirit...show me the error and I will fix it immediately.
My Bible interpretation must be way off...in my Bible I see corruption in my heart, that only Christ can make clean, apart from Him, I am nothing.
Buck72 said:WHERE IS IT "UNLOVE" TO SHARE THE WORD OF TRUTH WHERE ERROR IS ABOUNDING?
FORGET THE MESSENGER...LOOK AT THE MESSAGE.seebs said:Consider, if you will, the question of the way in which you share the truth.
Are you, when you do this, possibly implying that you are a better person than those you correct? If so, that's not especially loving.
Are you implying that they are stupid? Are you implying that they are willful in their misunderstanding, rather than honest but fallible?
These are just some of the many ways to be unloving in saying truth.
Humility is very important.
Karl, God bless you -- I mean that.Karl - Liberal Backslider said:I think the problem is when people insist the shoe fits when they feel it doesn't.
Insisting Gene Robinson is wearing the "sinful lifestyle" shoe would be a case in point. He isn't offended by people telling him he's a filthy sinner because the shoe fits, but because it doesn't.
What does it say then?Karl - Liberal Backslider said:The debate of whether the Bible condemns all forms of homosexual behaviour has been done to death elsewhere at CF, and an important feature of it is that rarely does it result in a change of opinion.
The only thing we can agree on is that you say it does, and I say it doesn't. The difference is that I genuinely accept that you truly believe what you say you believe; I get the distinct impression that the conservatives think that we liberals "know" we're wrong but are unwilling to admit it. Mutual respect of different positions - that's all that's asked.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?