- Nov 15, 2006
- 43,936
- 14,021
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
But "plainly" is YOUR word, and YOUR standard. You are dismissing out of hand scripture that actually nicely illustrates exactly how the prophetic should and often does work, no matter how many people tell you otherwise. We are all checking scripture here. You are the only one rejecting it based on a personal standard.
I agree completely on your other points, but perhaps for slightly different reasons.
On this we completely disagree - reminder
This approach throws out absolutely no scripture whatsoever, in fact, it put the final authority with the Scripture.
I am more than willing, and have looked at the one scripture you have posted so far that you feel illustrates your position. I refuted your assertion and you have provided no other to support.
Instead of making judgements on my posting, why not just give examples in scripture? It's ok to have an opinion on the matter, but don't be so married to an opinion that you take offense over someone with a differing opinion.
So far I have been called unteachable, not reading slow enough or with the proper methodology, and now I am disregarding scripture.
What I have not seen is scripture to support a supposition. There is no emotion behind this, just coming from a point of view that requires proof other than thoughts of what something means.
This might very well be one of the reasons the Office of the Prophet is not as active nor effective as it is designed to be.
It is also an interesting side note that no one has asked me what I think might be the difference, or what I am talking about.
Upvote
0