i'm part Greek and always appreciated the music of George Michael, a Greek English man,
who died some years ago.
I posted a song i like on Facebook and my christian friend told me that he was a
homosexual that never repented and loved his lifestyle.
I told her, I knew this, but was purely just sharing a song I liked
I reminded her that Jesus had died for him.
This was her reply:-
Well the Lord Jesus only died for those the Father has given to Him, not everyone, He does declare to everyone, every where, to repent, but so many are happy and content to rebel against and disobey Almighty God. So sad for them. If only they knew how awesome is God's mercy and Love.
The mainstream, majority Christian view throughout history has been that Jesus Christ died for everyone--no exceptions.
Within Protestant Christianity (Lutherans, Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, Pentecostals, Non-Denominational Churches, etc) there are roughly three main views: Lutheran, Calvinist, and Arminian.
Without getting too into it, and noting that this is going to be an extreme over-simplification, these three major theological divisions of Protestant Christianity can roughly be summarized as follows:
Lutheran: The Lutheran view is sometimes called "Universal Atonement". Keep in mind, this is
not "Universalism". Universalism is an entirely different thing that says everyone will be saved. Universal Atonement means, simply, Jesus died for everyone. Looking to the Scriptures that say, for example, that Christ's work has brought justification to all (Romans 5:18), that Christ suffered death for everyone (Hebrews 2:9), and that God is the Savior of all human beings (1 Timothy 4:10). Ergo the death Christ died He died for all, everyone. He did not die only for the elect, and it is not conditional.
Calvinism: The Calvinist view is that Christ died only for the elect, those whom God by His sovereign decree unconditionally predestined to salvation. Since God predestined who would believe, Christ only died for these. This is an unconditional election,God chose who would be saved based purely on His own sovereign choice. This view is traditionally known as "Limited Atonement" as Christ's atoning work is limited only for those whom God has unconditionally elected and predestined for salvation.
Arminianism: The Arminian view is that Christ's atoning work is unlimited and conditional; it is called "Unlimited Atonement" because Christ's atonement
can apply to anyone. God, in His foreknowledge, knew who would receive faith and believe; and thus all who would come to believe in Jesus are the elect, and Christ's atonement applies to these. Election, therefore, is conditional because who is elect is conditioned on their own choice to believe and come to Jesus in faith.
As I noted earlier, I'm painting with very broad strokes to sketch a brief summary. Lots of Protestant Christians from various denominations and traditions have views that probably incorporate elements from all three to various and varying degrees.
And note, I've only addressed Protestantism, there are also the views of the Eastern (Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox) and also other Western Churches (Roman Catholic) that would need to also be considered and looked at for a much fuller picture of Christian thought on the subject.
So, with that said, what do I believe about Jesus' atoning work and George Michael? Jesus Christ died for everyone--no exceptions. What is the fate of George Michael? I have no idea. That's not my business, but my hope and prayer for him, as all other human beings, is that they be saved and found with the Lord. Judgement belongs to God alone, our job is to be Christians and for the Church to be the Church: Confessing the faith which we have received from the beginning, proclaiming the word, receiving the precious gifts of God's word and Sacraments, loving our neighbor, committing ourselves to lives of contrition, repentance, humility, love, and good works toward our fellow man.
With all the things in life and the world at large to actually care about, why would someone waste precious moments of their life to choose to be offended by someone listening to a George Michael song and posting it on Facebook? I can't think of many things more spiritually vapid and lazy than that kind of moralistic micro-managing that some people engage in.
-CryptoLutheran