Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
the eight years of the Obama 'Great Recession'
What year are you thinking of?
What about people who were unable then to live that dream? Why should they want to go back?
As long as they were white, male and above a certain wealth threshold.
Trump certainly continued the steep decline in unemployment which began during Obama's first term--which is to his credit.They were all helped during the Trump recovery. That's something that almost no one could say during the eight years of the Obama 'Great Recession' and that administration's commitment to groveling before every dictator in the world and paying billions to some of them in the vain hope of winning their friendship.
A time of Jim Crow.........it hawks back to the post war boom of the late 40s and fifties.It means going back to the American dream. God, family, employment and that good Ole white picket fence. A time when people said good morning and good day. A time when Americans were united.
All that wasn't so long ago.
And straight, don’t forget that.As long as they were white, male and above a certain wealth threshold.
I know, I still can't work out why Obama used his time machine and wrecked the economy in 2008.....They were all helped during the Trump recovery. That's something that almost no one could say during the eight years of the Obama 'Great Recession' and that administration's commitment to groveling before every dictator in the world and paying billions to some of them in the vain hope of winning their friendship.
For trump supporters, those people don't count.What about people who were unable then to live that dream? Why should they want to go back?
And here we were thinking it was trump that was exchanging love letters with Kim Jong-Un.They were all helped during the Trump recovery. That's something that almost no one could say during the eight years of the Obama 'Great Recession' and that administration's commitment to groveling before every dictator in the world and paying billions to some of them in the vain hope of winning their friendship.
I've see a few statements on threads about MAGA and people challenging the phrase.
I would like to hear what MAGA means to you. Not what you think MAGA means to others. But what does MAGA mean to you personally.
I don't want this thread to turn into an argument, or a debate, but a view. This way we can see what MAGA really means to each other. It may or may not be enlightening, but I guess we will see. So please post what MAGA means to you personally. Please don't challenge other people's posts. Ready, set, go!
So much ado from the critics because the president tried to 'sweet talk' Kim. That's all he did. And he hoped that it would lead to North Korea's being willing to lower the threat of war.And here we were thinking it was trump that was exchanging love letters with Kim Jong-Un.
For those who don't know what he's talking about and care about the truth, here's the full story.Now compare that with Obama straightaway giving the Mullahs in Iran a 150 billion dollar bribe to please slow down your development of an nuclear bomb.
And here's the truth. No, the USA didn't give 150 billion to Iran out of our treasury, but we made 150 billion dollars available to Iran that it wouldn't otherwise have, on the condition that it merely promise to slow, not stop, its work towards a nuclear bomb.For those who don't know what he's talking about and care about the truth, here's the full story.
This is, of course, incorrect, the Iran nuclear deal negotiations were with the International Atomic Energy Association, the P5+1, and the European Union and led by the Italian diplomat Federica Mogherini.Now compare that with Obama straightaway giving the Mullahs in Iran a 150 billion dollar bribe to please slow down your development of an nuclear bomb.
Which is not the same thing as 'straightaway giving' them the money, as you claimed. It was their money in the first place.And here's the truth. No, the USA didn't give 150 billion to Iran out of our treasury, but we made 150 billion dollars available to Iran that it wouldn't otherwise have,
Since Iran's rapidly increased their production under Trump, it's not like he's done any better.on the condition that it merely promise to slow, not stop, its work towards a nuclear bomb.
For those who don't know what he's talking about and care about the truth, here's the full story.
Obama Didn't Give 0'150 Billion in Cash' - FactCheck.org
It's also worth noting that, under Trump, Iran has increased its enriched uranium stockpile ten-fold. They're a good deal closer to developing nuclear weapons than ever before.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?