I like him, but he does say some strange things. The reason he wasn't condemned is because he died first. Several of his propositions were condemned.
Now I've heard folks defend him, saying that the censor was reading him out of context in an unfair way. Having looked into this, it seems incorrect. Sure, some propositions were read out of context in an unfair way. Others... not so much. I don't have the propositions handy, but various books on Eckhart include them. There are some pretty weird ones.
In any case, the sermons we have of Eckhart's don't find him doing Biblical exegesis in any straightforward way. I don't think the majority of his work is incompatible with the Bible, but he had lots of extra-Biblical sources, often Platonic thinkers.