What do you all think about this paper/article?

[AV1611VET]

Thanks to telescopes we can actually observe 9500 BC (or so) [and simultaneously see our own future]

Scientists catch real-life Death Star devouring a planet in 1st-of-its-kind discovery

QV please: SN1987A

 

[Lost4words]

As i have stated before, the world wide flood did happen. How?

Because i believe in the word of God.

Plus, i had two Corgi ancestors on the Ark!!

 

[Hans Blaster]

QV please: SN1987A

So you're just going to ignore the *last* time I told you that your bizarre fantasy about "Sanduleak" was trash. Sanduleak was an astronomer who mapped the stars where the SN happened, not some mythological being. Like many of your "science" posts it is frankly insulting. It is also irrelevant. (Just like many of your "science" posts.)

 

[AV1611VET]

So you're just going to ignore the *last* time I told you that your bizarre fantasy about "Sanduleak" was trash.

Of course.

Sanduleak was an astronomer who mapped the stars where the SN happened, not some mythological being.

Fine.

But don't miss the point.

Whatever name that angel had, it's tangential to the point.

Like many of your "science" posts it is frankly insulting.

I post science, do I?

Every once in awhile I might copy-and-paste an article or two.

Big deal.

It is also irrelevant.

It's very relevant.

It means you can't see 9500 BC, because there is no such thing as 9500 BC.

Time began in 4004 BC.

(Just like many of your "science" posts.)

I post "science," do I?

 

[Hans Blaster]

I post "science," do I?

The pretend kind, hence the quotes around "science".

 

[AV1611VET]

The pretend kind, hence the quotes around "science".

If it's all just pretend, why the attitude?

What are you afraid of?

 

[Hans Blaster]

If it's all just pretend, why the attitude?

What are you afraid of?

Afraid of? That's not really the question. I'm here to deal with pseudoscience and you often inject your particular brand of nonsense into conversations that weren't involving you for what seems like just and attempt to get attention.

 

[AV1611VET]

Afraid of? That's not really the question. I'm here to deal with pseudoscience and you often inject your particular brand of nonsense into conversations that weren't involving you for what seems like just and attempt to get attention.

How's come you're the only one who whines about it that strongly?

You seem to have copped an attitude towards me that, frankly, displays the same type of intolerance that has led to persecution and martyrdom of Christians in the past.

 

[Hans Blaster]

How's come you're the only one who whines about it that strongly?

You seem to have copped an attitude towards me that, frankly, displays the same type of intolerance that has led to persecution and martyrdom of Christians in the past.

I just don't buy into your nice guy/jester persona.

 

[AV1611VET]

I just don't buy into your nice guy/jester persona.

I have a feeling you don't buy into a lot of stuff.

 

[notworthconsideration]

Interesting - Josephus mentions folks making pilgrimage to the Ark and names the tribe who were given task of being it's guardians.

I expect, when the hour is late enough, it will be found and stand as a physical object of judgement.

I recall reading, that when it was initially discovered by outsiders, this guardian sect removed and hid anything that could be used as an idols or ancient treasures. It is rumored, also, that an earthquake destroyed the entire encampment where they lived and hid the artifacts.

 

[Carl Emerson]

The Ark itself can be seen in an ice face at 14000 feet. My late cousin Hadden Lowrey a professional photographer, photographed the decks in the ice from a helicopter. The middle section disappeared in glacial flow and the end section profile can still be seen - but the climatic conditions need to be real good to see this and that is a rare event.

That is why fragments of white oak have been found way down on the valley floor.

 

[AV1611VET]

The Ark itself can be seen in an ice face at 14000 feet. My late cousin Hadden Lowrey a professional photographer, photographed the decks in the ice from a helicopter. The middle section disappeared in glacial flow and the to end section profile can still be seen but the climatic conditions need to be real good to see this and that is a rare event.

You don't think Noah would have dismantled the Ark to build his homestead after the Flood?

 

[sjastro]

How's come you're the only one who whines about it that strongly?

You seem to have copped an attitude towards me that, frankly, displays the same type of intolerance that has led to persecution and martyrdom of Christians in the past.

I'm just as critical of pseudoscience and I'm a Christian although some Christians here don't believe it.
Drawing a long bow by associating @Hans Blaster's attitude to pseudoscience with persecution and martyrdom of Christians is uncalled for.

I noticed you didn't respond in the other thread about evangelical Christians labelling the climate scientist Katherine Hayhoe as a "sad, little mediocrity,” an “ugly fake scientist” and an “old thin-looking hag.”
Despite this I'm not going to draw the long bow in suggesting evangelical Christians advocate the raping and murdering of female climate scientists as proposed by some extremists

 

[AV1611VET]

Drawing a long bow by associating @Hans Blaster's attitude to pseudoscience with persecution and martyrdom of Christians is uncalled for.

Hans took care of it.

 

[Carl Emerson]

You don't think Noah would have dismantled the Ark to build his homestead after the Flood?

Naaa...

 

[AV1611VET]

Naaa...

Is that what you would have done?

 

[Carl Emerson]

Naaa...

It was common to make a pilgrimage to the Ark in Jesus day - Josephus mentions it.

 

[AV1611VET]

It was common to make a pilgrimage to the Ark in Jesus day - Josephus mentions it.

-- Okay then.

 

[Carl Emerson]

-- Okay then.

Am I detecting skepticism?