• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What do we need churches for?

Status
Not open for further replies.

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What do we need churches for? (pardon the grammar faux pas)

Why can't we go back to meetings in homes, where you actually know and care about eh people in your worship fellowship? What do larger congregations and especially the megachurches provide? [Other than $$$$$$, $$$$$$, and more $$$$$$]
 

Finella

Veteran
Feb 27, 2004
1,590
199
51
PA
✟25,232.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Have you heard of the Emerging Church movement? It's kinda the same idea you have, where people meet up at people's garages or homes and transform that space into a worship space, then pack it up and do it at a different location the next week. I don't know much about it, but the guy who founded it actually did it because he had been a pastor at a megachurch and couldn't take the focus on $$ and the corporate business structure of it all.

I think it's a fabulous idea, but there are some things that make me wary of it: 1) how would new people find you? 2) who runs the show? 3) who is qualified to run the show? could anyone with any kind of ideology just start a church like this? (well, not that this problem has stopped anyone before...)

I think if it were offered as an alternative form of worship and gathering coming out of an already established denomination, then it could be really amazing.
 
Upvote 0

KCDAD

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
12,546
372
70
Illinois
✟14,800.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Finella said:
I think it's a fabulous idea, but there are some things that make me wary of it: 1) how would new people find you? 2) who runs the show? 3) who is qualified to run the show? could anyone with any kind of ideology just start a church like this? (well, not that this problem has stopped anyone before...)
1) It would be word of mouth and personal contacts... as it should be... and was with Jesus and the early church.
2) The Holy Spirit... I used to be a fellowship group that sometimes we would get all spiritual, sometimes worldy and personal, and sometimes we would sit around in silence for an hour... I still love those people after 30 years...
3) Ditto... Surrender to the power of Almighty God and with a desire to seek the truth in love, why would you need to have someone in charge?
 
Upvote 0

HisEagle

Senior Veteran
Feb 26, 2004
2,311
150
✟18,242.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
KCDAD said:
1) It would be word of mouth and personal contacts... as it should be... and was with Jesus and the early church.
2) The Holy Spirit... I used to be a fellowship group that sometimes we would get all spiritual, sometimes worldy and personal, and sometimes we would sit around in silence for an hour... I still love those people after 30 years...
3) Ditto... Surrender to the power of Almighty God and with a desire to seek the truth in love, why would you need to have someone in charge?

1) No comment really. I don't disagree.

2) Isn't that basically how Quakers operate?

3) The only problem is that the Bible alludes to teachers, elders, bishops, etc... - indicating a formal structure of authority. How would you get around that?

Along with that, if not even the early church was immune to the teaching of false or man-made doctrines, how do you know that what you were discussing/learning/sharing in these meetings would be sound doctrine?
 
Upvote 0

Finella

Veteran
Feb 27, 2004
1,590
199
51
PA
✟25,232.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
groundhog said:
1) No comment really. I don't disagree.

2) Isn't that basically how Quakers operate?

3) The only problem is that the Bible alludes to teachers, elders, bishops, etc... - indicating a formal structure of authority. How would you get around that?

Along with that, if not even the early church was immune to the teaching of false or man-made doctrines, how do you know that what you were discussing/learning/sharing in these meetings would be sound doctrine?
Groundhog and KCDAD, yeah, I can go with your views on #s 1 & 2, although understand that I'm an Episcopalian, so I'm used to someone being "in charge." :D Liturgy, structure, etc. It's honestly what keeps me from moving to the Quakers at the moment... I love liturgy too much.

But Groundhog, your last point here is really what I meant--how can you ensure that bad theology isn't being passed along if there's no criteria for the leadership? You could so easily create a group that gets swept up in emotional experiences of god and becomes no more than a kind of cult. I think that's why I think tying it in with an established denomination would make it work better.

This is kinda what we do, to a limited degree, with my campus ministry, which is a joint Episcopal/Lutheran venture with an Episcopal priest for a chaplain. We transform campus spaces into worship spaces and make the liturgy what we need it to be. It's so far removed from traditional "church" and that's why I love it.
 
Upvote 0

hartlandcat

Unitarian
Jun 3, 2004
196
15
36
England
Visit site
✟22,914.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Within my denomination, Unitarians in Britain, congregations of about 20 people are the norm — which isn't particularly unusual by British standards. I like it small like that, although we do need to start thinking seriously about numerical growth because most members are aged 65+. We only really have room for a maximum of about 70 people anyway.
 
Upvote 0

Im_A

Legend
May 10, 2004
20,113
1,494
✟42,859.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
KCDAD said:
What do we need churches for? (pardon the grammar faux pas)

Why can't we go back to meetings in homes, where you actually know and care about eh people in your worship fellowship? What do larger congregations and especially the (demonic) megachurches provide? [Other than $$$$$$, $$$$$$, and more $$$$$$]

i think the Emerging Movement is along this as mentioned already. my church, even though i haven't been there for awhile due to driving issues currently is a home based church. the pastor has his pastoral through the Missionary Church and they fully support what he is wanting to do. and now, there are many home based churches that he's helping create in the area. he leads one, and then he leads one in the tattoo parlor he and another Christian opened up on another day. if you want to check it out, here's the url: www.pdox.org feel free to come to the discussion page if you want to

there's several things i like about it.

one, since it is a home based church, the ministry does have an infiliation with a denomination. not for income sources, cause right now, him opening up that tattoo parlor was partly in due to the fact that he needed more income to live with...he has a wife and two kids. but he also goes and speaks at different churches, so it's not a total seperation from "the church" as a body.

the meetings are usually centered around discussion and fellowship...fellowship used to last till 11pm at times. we all hang out, eat together, have a couple of hours of study and go back to fellowship. so it isn't an hour escapade.

the praise and worship time...well there is none. if anything, our praise and worship could be seen through our fellowship of being where more than one gathers in the name, He is there also. i like it. i'm sick of emotional worship songs, and even hymnals. i would rather have discussion, deep discussion instead of worrying about some pivatol worship band, or singing old hymns that i could really careless about.

it's a place where you aren't judged by your theological standpoints. the pastor and i have become friends now, and he knows some standpoints i stand on. doesn't me he agrees with me all the time, cause that's not the point. we are more focused about the here and now with the kingdom of God, and how are we to bring the Gospel to the world in ways that can defeat the walls that are up against Christianity...and ironically been tearing apart a so called "all powerful belief." if your a skeptic, your welcome just as the next Christian.

the discussions are, for me at least, stimulating. a lot of studies i have noticed are in the mindframe of similiar to Brian McLaren. we have used his studies as part of our discussions.

if i would judge the pastor and his wife as the model of the ministry, i would say it is great. they have constantly offered me their home to stay at for days and just hang out. it's nice, when conversation may not always be around theology or Christian. but actually just be friends and brothers and sisters in the faith. the pastor and i have a lot in common or so it seems and their kids are little blessings. plus i helped him make a castle bunk bed. as maybe pointless as it seems in regards to "church", to me it is big, cause again, it is actual fellowship, and not hearing another person say amen to what you have to say, then have nothing to do with you after the hour of church has passed. plus, when my fiancee and i are ready, a nd she's here, he's going to marry us. thankfully my fiancee is cool with it, just cause he's a friend of mine, and plus, well, he's a bit "unorthodox looking" :p, hell she's with me, hahaha, she's got a fun time ahead for her in this area, muhahaha.

i haven't been there in awhile and changes have came. i hope within the next month or so i can get back up regularly. it was one ministry that actually, i put as another thing that either saved my faith, or at least, pushed me to deal with things healthly. i found out about this ministry when i was up in the city, planning on going out to a bar and getting drunk. i still went to that bar that night, but ironically enough i didn't get drunk. either God does do things, or accident timing is truly a blessing.

plus on a funny/personal note, it's the first church that when i parked my truck there, it got broken into and towed. kind of odd coming out, and all you see is a puddle of glass, and no truck, because the bed of my truck was blocking the garage of the gay bar next to it, and all my cd's were gone, and window completely gone, and me and his brother walking downtown Toledo trying to find my truck and eventually running into a gay bouncer for a bar, and having a great conversation with. as odd as that seems, and i had to pay some money to get the truck fixed, it was actually a really good night. they have sadly moved from that location to be more home based, but still putting a church in that kind of situation, at least to me shows they have the right intentions, but i guess there's always a need for churches in white suburban areas, but i've never lived in the suburbs so it's hard to relate to people/a church setting that attend some megachurch. i got sick of people making it public/to the congregation about the income, claiming God was doing it, when as far as i'm concerned it's nothing spiritual. people with money, giving money to a church, is nothing of a spiritual issue, but just simple financial logic, that church will prosper.

so hopefully you don't mind me talking about this church and then basically agreeing with you kcdad about the stuff you mentioned in your OP. God Bless KCDAD!

btw-when is the animaniacs re-run start? is it going on already? :p :)
 
Upvote 0

knightlight72

Soldier of Christ
Dec 11, 2003
879
42
53
Canada
✟1,253.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Interesting ideas all around. Nothing wrong with small churches/gathering places.

God is not kept out of large churches. (maybe some people think God is kept out of churches with large memberships?)


So the reason we use churches though, is to gather and build each other up for God. No reason you can't do that in a church of any size and/or meet in a home for gatherings for God.

Personally, I go to church services, and still meet in homes for studies.
 
Upvote 0

swedenborgian

Junior Member
May 11, 2006
67
5
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟22,713.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe that "God is one and there is a conjuction of charity and faith." Every time I mention this (the condensation of Doctrine of the New Church by Swedenborg - a servant of the Lord Jesus Christ), it is fully and resolutely rejected by mainstream churches. This is utterly unacceptable. Thank God for publishing and the internet and small groups and the ever-increasing cheapness of web chat, forums and publishing. How is the universal idea of one God every going to survive "three persons from eternity" unless the mainstream churches are left to smolder and die. How else is the universal idea that God is everything good and true survive unless you can go around these people? Of Babylon the Great it is said that you can see her from afar off smoldering and on fire. The mainstream protestants who preach faith alone and predestination and three Gods are no better. A spiritual war in truth and good has to be won by the servants of the Lord Jesus Christ before mainstream churches are good to go to again.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.