I know where you're coming from. Particularly in real life (as opposed to internet forums) scientists are going to debate ideas. However, on internet forums (this forum is not the only one I post on), sceptics almost universally agree with each other (that is, they will always quote other sceptics who posted, congratulating them on making fantastic points). Christians do the same, of course, when they see a fellow Christian post a great response. But my point is that I rarely see sceptics disagree with each other when it comes to discussing matters of belief in deities.
Just a thought to consider
~ PA
The discussions on belief coming from skeptics is a strange one. Some opinions do differ but many who are intellectually honest will accumulate around central ideas, such as there being little to know evidence of God's existence; scripture as being contradictory; belief being subjective, etc. Arguments which arise between skeptics alike, for instance, when an atheist claims that there
isn't a God, you might find that an agnostic in this debate is going to be largely supported.
Why are you so concerned in what a believer thinks of you? I can tell you why...it's because a part of you...you know, the holy spirit that is in you is trying to tell you the truth and your spending all your time trying to prove it wrong. Sit down, take a deep breath, think for a minute, let the spirit tell you what you need to hear, after, read the Bible, join a church body, doesn't matter which one and get involved. If that doesn't do it for you....I will be praying double time for you! God be with you my truth searching friend.
I'm really here to understand, and learn more effective ways to get along with people of different beliefs, and similar values.
My feelings, from knowledge, not ignorance, towards the unbeliever are clearly articulated by the truths of the Scriptures.
I appreciate that you call this knowledge, that from the Scriptures would have be knowledge
of the Scriptures. As to their truth bearing factors on reality outside of these, say for instance, in a nonchristian country, I can't say. In my opinion these beliefs can only apply to those who believe in them, as being reprasentative of the truth.
AMR said:
The unbeliever...
- is deceitful[sup]*a[/sup] and desperately sick[sup]b[/sup] (Jer. 17:9);
- is full of evil (Mark 7:21-23);
- loves darkness rather than light (John 3:19);
- is unrighteous[sup]c[/sup], does not understand[sup]d[/sup], does not seek for God[sup]e[/sup] (Rom. 3:10-12);
- is helpless and ungodly[sup]e[/sup] (Rom. 5:6);
- is dead[sup]f[/sup] in his trespasses and sins (Eph. 2:1);
- is by nature a child of wrath[sup]g[/sup] (Eph. 2:3);
- cannot understand spiritual[sup]h[/sup] things (1 Cor. 2:14); and
- is a slave[sup]i[/sup] of sin (Rom. 6:16-20).
*a. I seek the truth, I speak what I believe is truth, and I'm always willing to improve what my version of the truth is.
b. I'm feeling ok at the moment but thanks for asking.
c. If this means doing what is considered right by social standards of abiding by the law and leading by example, then I am not an unrighteous man.
d. I understand what ever I am able to understand when I'm presented with it. Why should the lack of ability to comprehend something become a negative point about me as a person? I think this is slightly outdated view of what being a "good" person is about.
e. I don't know about helpless, but you would need to define what godly is. Is it upstanding, honest, etc - as I mentioned above - even in part?
f. Dead? I'm alive as far as I can tell, then were it that I weren't I probably wouldn't know if I were.
g. I think most are guilty of wrath to some extent. Some Christian parents might know the limitations of their patience. As I certainly know of the wrath of the middle ages concerning those "convicted" of witchcraft.
h. I understand, overwhelmingly, I'm just not convinced.
i. I could become Buddhist, if I felt like it. I believe a Buddhist is unable to be a slave to commiting worldly sin (attrocities). And I've never heard of violence being raised in the form of war, etc by Buddhists.
AMR said:
It is quite simple. Non-believers, deep down, know God is, they just don't like the God who is. I bear you no negative feelings, rather it is my fervent hope that you understand the good news and pray that it be the will of God to quicken you to eternal life.
I'm much more inclined to agree to there being
a God (whom no person knows in even the slightest), than to believe in a version of God from other men, let alone follow the "rules" of God from such - It's preposterous!
AMR said:
The Good News: Romans 3:23; 6:23; 8:1; 10:9; 10:13
Romans 3:23
for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Romans 8:1
There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.
Romans 10:9
that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.
Romans 10:13
For "whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."
AMR
I think there are some beautiful literary pieces in the bible. Thankyou for sharing some of them here. I think they are thought provoking and can be a source of inspiration, especially in times of desperation. My view is that one nicely stated truism doesn't make the next equally nice.
Please forgive whatever offence I might have created in expressing my beliefs. I'm happy to be completely honest while maintaining respect for one another.
Kind regards.