Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Let me know when you can find a lab report that shows that evolution has been replicated by a process other than reproduction or mutation.
What exactly is it that you respect about it?Although I obviously wouldn’t entirely agree with it, I respect your viewpoint.
What exactly is it that you respect about it?
Why do you believe I am a Christian?Seems like a reasonable point of view for a Christian to take to me.
I’d adopt the same position if I were to become Christian.
Evidence?God created evolution.
Why do you believe I am a Christian?
Evidence?
And what do you mean by that? You do realize that your statement tells us that Genesis cannot be read literally. A literal interpretation of Genesis is in opposition to the concept of evolution.
Instead of just shooting down the source, why don't you just read the article from a fully recognised scientist. This is what I am saying - you will only accept articles by evolutionists who are biased toward their unproven theories, but will not read anything else that might show a different side to it. Would this show a closed mind that wants just to see one side of the story. This would lead me to believe that it won't matter what I might say, or use as a supporting citation, you would find an excuse to shoot it own every time. So I don't see any point in continuing this discussion because it is too one sided for me. I have provided intelligent, informative posts, and all you have done is to shoot each one down. So, have a good life.
Did it ever occur to you that we are not entitled to know what, why, and how God does what He does? After all, our curiosity is what got us into this mess in the first place. Call it a cop-out if you must, but there is plenty of other evidence in the world that one can study to show that there are metaphysical planes at play, here.
I hate to see people manipulated by falsely presented science particularly when their goals (AIG, DI, CSM, etc.) is to get your money.
Christians could justly make that claim. Ironically murder would not even be a sin if Adam and Eve had not eaten from the tree in Christian belief. Adam and his offspring would have no clue when they did anything wrong if the story were true, and there would be no need for Jesus and the cross if the they never ate the fruit. The whole story is rife with problems for Christian theology when taken literally.That’s quite close to the Luciferian narrative. I’m surprised you didn’t just go ahead and say the snake was the hero.
Christians could justly make that claim. Ironically murder would not even be a sin if Adam and Eve had not eaten from the tree in Christian belief. Adam and his offspring would have no clue when they did anything wrong if the story were true, and there would be no need for Jesus and the cross if the they never ate the fruit. The whole story is rife with problems for Christian theology when taken literally.
I disagree. We can learn beyond our scope of knowledge. That is what the sciences are designed to do. You may be uncomfortable with the fact that a literal interpretation of Genesis was debunked over 200 years ago. And it was early Christian geologists that first did that be refuting a literal worldwide flood. That does not mean that Genesis cannot be used as a source instruction. That only means that the Bible should not be used as a science source.I think the main problem with humans, is trying to understand a concept, or even what we believe are problems, from our perspective, when it’s just not possible. You can’t fathom something that is beyond your frame of reference, and outside your sphere of knowledge.
I’m not going to act as though there aren’t some elements in the Bible that baffle me, and I do question my own beliefs, a lot. But even scripture says, “Don’t rely upon your own understanding” because our ways are not God’s ways, and our thoughts are not God’s thoughts. And the whole thing about worldly wisdom...
I disagree. We can learn beyond our scope of knowledge. That is what the sciences are designed to do. You may be uncomfortable with the fact that a literal interpretation of Genesis was debunked over 200 years ago. And it was early Christian geologists that first did that be refuting a literal worldwide flood. That does not mean that Genesis cannot be used as a source instruction. That only means that the Bible should not be used as a science source.
It appears that you do not know the sources, nor the backgrounds of the geologists, or their non-participation in organisations other than church and college. Nor have you researched the geology yourself. Were you aware of any of these things you would not be making ill-informed posts.Where is the specific source? Do you know the backgrounds of the geologists? What organizations are they connected to? Did you research the geology yourself, or did you believe what other men before you, told you?
Well, a God who is fathomable by the mere human mind, is not a God I want to worship.
Also, the entirety of the advent of science is pretty much just an extension of alchemy, freemasonry and the Kabbalah. It’s a no-brainer that the very community in opposition to God, serves to destroy the existence of Him through funded “research” and “studies”.
It’s not some “gotcha” to claim that “Christian” geologists debunked a worldwide flood. The jesuits and many other societies claim to be Christian while remaining loyal to their occult founders.
Where is the specific source? Do you know the backgrounds of the geologists? What organizations are they connected to? Did you research the geology yourself, or did you believe what other men before you, told you?
How? Can that be observed in a laboratory?Well, there are certainly more processes in evolution than just reproduction and mutation (including natural selection, genetic drift, HGT, etc).
That said, the process that evolved living things over billions of years is the same process we observe in organisms today.
How? Can that be observed in a laboratory?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?