• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

what are you?

what are you?

  • i am nothing more than atoms and molecules

  • i am more than what atoms and molecules can explain

  • i am undecide.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
None of the above.

We are more than what single molecules and atoms can explain. Nature is full of emergent properties where the larger structure is more than the individual components. The behavior of the ocean can not be explained by the behavior of a single water molecule. A single molecule of water is not "wet".

On an emotional level, there is nothing wrong with people assigning subjective emotional value to things that they wouldn't to their individual atomic constituents.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟262,441.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
None of the above.

We are more than what single molecules and atoms can explain. Nature is full of emergent properties where the larger structure is more than the individual components. The behavior of the ocean can not be explained by the behavior of a single water molecule. A single molecule of water is not "wet".

On an emotional level, there is nothing wrong with people assigning subjective emotional value to things that they wouldn't to their individual atomic constituents.

This.
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
68
Scotland
Visit site
✟67,923.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
Ahahahahaha!

2007-oct-21-witch-burning-cancelled.gif
 
Upvote 0

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
None of the above.

We are more than what single molecules and atoms can explain. Nature is full of emergent properties where the larger structure is more than the individual components. The behavior of the ocean can not be explained by the behavior of a single water molecule. A single molecule of water is not "wet".
yes, but that behavior can be explain by the analysis of its parts.
so far, consciousness has eluded any explanation.
life, as far as i can tell, has eluded any explanation.
with the properties of atoms/molecules, and a computer program, we can simulate quite a few things.

On an emotional level, there is nothing wrong with people assigning subjective emotional value to things that they wouldn't to their individual atomic constituents.
what about concepts such as the will or gut feelings?
these aren't emotions, both are valid concepts.
 
Upvote 0
S

SteveB28

Guest
yes, but that behavior can be explain by the analysis of its parts.
so far, consciousness has eluded any explanation.
life, as far as i can tell, has eluded any explanation.
with the properties of atoms/molecules, and a computer program, we can simulate quite a few things.


what about concepts such as the will or gut feelings?
these aren't emotions, both are valid concepts.

Why can't these be explained as cerebral functions?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
yes, but that behavior can be explain by the analysis of its parts.

Not really. You can't explain weather patterns by analysing a single water molecule.

so far, consciousness has eluded any explanation.
life, as far as i can tell, has eluded any explanation.

That's why we have science, to discover these explanations.

what about concepts such as the will or gut feelings?
these aren't emotions, both are valid concepts.

Those are emotions.
 
Upvote 0