But as
60 Minutes
shows and Bob Enyart sums it up, "This is dinosaur."
If memory serves, that 60 Minutes special is about the same instance with the material in the T-Rex bone.
Please explain how you're getting this:
strata tissue from "70-million year old" Mosasaur: As below, and in this peer-reviewed report by researchers including from Lund University in Sweden and Southern Methodist University in Dallas, scientists confirm another biological tissue discovery using sophisticated techniques to rule out modern contamination, bio-film, etc., concluding that original biological collagen exists in a small bone from an extinct marine reptile called a mosasaur. Yet according to a report in Science Magazine as it relates top the discoveries of dinosaur tissue, scientists calculate the maximum survival time of collagen not in millions but in thousands of years.
From this:
Moreover, the fibrils differ significantly in spectral signature from those of potential modern bacterial contaminants, such as biofilms and collagen-like proteins. Thus, the preservation of primary soft tissues and biomolecules is not limited to large-sized bones buried in fluvial sandstone environments, but also occurs in relatively small-sized skeletal elements deposited in marine sediments.
I'm no expert, but it seems like they're arguing that, under certain circumstances, collagen can be preserved for abnormally long stretches of time.
Consider all the potential soft tissue, and perhaps even DNA, lost to humanity because of secular universities ignoring previous claims by young-earth creationists
Here's a funny thought - if YECs are so convinced that there are all these dinosaur bones that have all this soft tissue and that they've been right all along, why aren't they the ones going out and trying to find these things. You ever notice that? You don't hear about YECs actually finding this stuff, it's actual scientists in the actual field doing the actual work...and then YECs come along and hijack it. Come to think of it, what's stopping a YEC from just buying a fossil, cutting the thing open, and showing the world there's soft tissue inside? I know at least a few of them, like Ken Ham, have actual museums and fossils on display, and even if they didn't, they could probably afford to get at least one or two dinosaur bones. So why don't YECs do that, hm? Why do they sit on their thumbs and wait for actual scientists to do the work for them?
It's extremely telling that the only peer-reviewed work in your entire post came from people who are distinctly not creationists.
Regardless, I note that the peer-reviewed literature for this hadrosaur find is conspicuously absent. Link?
Oh, and about the archeopteryx find, you seem to have missed this part:
RSR: Not enough biological material was discovered to call it tissue but only remnants of tissue
Not feathers. The remnants of feathers. Not soft tissue. The remnants of soft tissue. That's a pretty big difference.
Last edited:
Upvote
0