LVdesigns
laetusatheos
dad said:Ther is no reason to assume it didn't. All reasons so far are a same past assumption and belief. Much weaked reasons than documetary evidence!
Ya, I can never be 100% certain about anything that happend that long ago. However, I tend to side with ideas that are based on observable evidence rather than what an old book said happened. I think there are plenty of reasons to not have to be agnostic about the flood. There is no fossil evidence and geological evidence that demonstrates that there was a flood. So, due to an extreme lack of evidence for a flood there is reason not to believe it occured. If there isn't proof of something, I consider it safe to say it didn't happen. If someone uncovers evidence later that will cause me to rethink my view, I will gladly do so.
Upvote
0