Was Y-Chromosomal Adam a monkey?

[TagliatelliMonster]

I think most died off in the flood in Noah's day and the rest may have been killed for food.

1. dino's went extinct 65 million years ago, which is 64+ million years before homo sapiens evolved

2. no such flood ever happened.

 

[New Birth]

Considering you have access to the internet, there are only 2 reasonable explanations for this:
1. you simply haven't been looking
2. you get your (mis)information from creationist propaganda.


In the 21st century, aka "the information age", and with open access to the internet, you really are without excuse.

why would I waste my time looking for something I dont believe in?

 

[Shemjaza]

so your not going to actually present evidence.

Went don't you tell me which of these points you don't believe, and later after I've slept and worked I'll try to have a look for the specifics for you?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

so you also believe humans evolved from non human ancestors?

All species evolved from ancestral species. Not just humans.
It's how life demonstrably works.

And I don't believe that. I accept this testable model as accurate because it fits/explains all the evidence, succesfully makes predictions and is contradicted by nothing.

 

[New Birth]

1. dino's went extinct 65 million years ago, which is 64+ million years before homo sapiens evolved

2. no such flood ever happened.

The earth is about 6000 years old, so your first statement is completely false, how did you get those numbers?
sure the flood happened, about 4000 years ago.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

evolution is just a theory right?

Yeah. Like atoms are "just" a theory. Or germs. Or relativity. Or plate tectonics. All "just" theories.

Evolution is Not Just a Theory: home

You are like a walking collection of PRATTs.

has it been demonstrated that one species evolves into another species? Was this observed?

Google "observed speciation"

Did it happen in a controlled environment?

In both the lab as well as the wild.

 

[New Birth]

All species evolved from ancestral species. Not just humans.
It's how life demonstrably works.

And I don't believe that. I accept this testable model as accurate because it fits/explains all the evidence, succesfully makes predictions and is contradicted by nothing.

so are you going to show the evidence for non human ancestors or no? and what was before human? were our ancestors walking on four legs what about before that were we birds and fish before that? Can you see this fairy tale?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

why would I waste my time looking for something I dont believe in?

If you don't want to "waste time" learning about the evidence in support of evolution, and about the evolutionary process itself, then don't come on here complaining that you haven't seen any evidence.................................................

Also, one might wonder as well how you decided that evolution wasn't believable while at the same time you never bothered to actually learn what it says and what the evidence in support of the model consists of exactly.

Actually, I don't have to wonder. I've conversed enough with creationists to know how that works.

It's not that you decided at some point that evolution wasn't believable... It's rather that you already decided to believe something mutually exclusive: your fundamentalist religious beliefs. And arguing against evolution is something you consider a theological requirement.

You don't actually know what evolution is about - and you don't care either.

All you care about is protecting your faith based fundamentalist beliefs.

This is why your opinion on the science of evolution doesn't matter at all.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

so your not going to actually present evidence.

Since you JUST said in post #102 that you "don't want to waste time looking at the evidence", why are you even asking for people to post evidence?

 

[Speedwell]

so your not going to actually present evidence.

Not in a chatroom. the most you can expect in a chatroom is descriptions of evidence or pictures of evidence. The actual evidence is in university science labs and fossil collections around the world.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

The earth is about 6000 years old, so your first statement is completely false, how did you get those numbers?

Science gets its numbers from carefull measurement of the data of reality.

You get your numbers from a bronze age book written by desert sheep herders who didn't even know that the earth orbits the sun.

sure the flood happened, about 4000 years ago.

Only in your bronze age book. And in the Epic of Gilgamesh.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

so are you going to show the evidence for non human ancestors or no?

Why would I?
You just said in post 102 that you don't care about the evidence.

Regardless, you have a computer with access to the internet.
Look it up. Don't ask me to do your homework.

I'm not responsible for your education.
And I'm certainly not interested in spending energy explaining things to someone who flat out states that he doesn't care about evidence and will simply believe what he wants to believe regardless.

were our ancestors walking on four legs what about before that were we birds and fish before that? Can you see this fairy tale?

I can see how ill-informed you are on the topic.

 

[New Birth]

Yeah. Like atoms are "just" a theory. Or germs. Or relativity. Or plate tectonics. All "just" theories.

Evolution is Not Just a Theory: home

You are like a walking collection of PRATTs.



Google "observed speciation"



In both the lab as well as the wild.

would speciation in a lab be considered

If you don't want to "waste time" learning about the evidence in support of evolution, and about the evolutionary process itself, then don't come on here complaining that you haven't seen any evidence.................................................

Also, one might wonder as well how you decided that evolution wasn't believable while at the same time you never bothered to actually learn what it says and what the evidence in support of the model consists of exactly.

Actually, I don't have to wonder. I've conversed enough with creationists to know how that works.

It's not that you decided at some point that evolution wasn't believable... It's rather that you already decided to believe something mutually exclusive: your fundamentalist religious beliefs. And arguing against evolution is something you consider a theological requirement.

You don't actually know what evolution is about - and you don't care either.

All you care about is protecting your faith based fundamentalist beliefs.

This is why your opinion on the science of evolution doesn't matter at all.

It seems something has gotten under your skin. That not good to let someone upset you that doesn't hold your religious beliefs. Of course my opinion of the belief of evolution doesn't matter I never claimed it did, nor does yours. Mad bro?

 

[New Birth]

Since you JUST said in post #102 that you "don't want to waste time looking at the evidence", why are you even asking for people to post evidence?

because its their theory they need to support their own beliefs.

 

[New Birth]

Why would I?
You just said in post 102 that you don't care about the evidence.

Regardless, you have a computer with access to the internet.
Look it up. Don't ask me to do your homework.

I'm not responsible for your education.
And I'm certainly not interested in spending energy explaining things to someone who flat out states that he doesn't care about evidence and will simply believe what he wants to believe regardless.



I can see how ill-informed you are on the topic.

Its your belief not mine why would I care to do "homework" on your beliefs?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

It seems something has gotten under your skin.

Yes: your intellectual dishonesty.

Asking for evidence and in the next breath saying you don't care about evidence anyway.
I find that quite annoying and disrespectfull to the people who actually invest the time and energy to respond to you.

That not good to let someone upset you that doesn't hold your religious beliefs.

I'm an atheist. I don't have religious beliefs.

Of course my opinion of the belief of evolution doesn't matter I never claimed it did, nor does yours. Mad bro?

No. Just very annoyed by your disrespect and intellectual dishonesty.

 

[New Birth]

Science gets its numbers from carefull measurement of the data of reality.

You get your numbers from a bronze age book written by desert sheep herders who didn't even know that the earth orbits the sun.



Only in your bronze age book. And in the Epic of Gilgamesh.

Thats fine, its the 21st century and you still believe we came from monkeys.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

because its their theory they need to support their own beliefs.

There are literally +200.000 peer reviewed science publications on the topic.
Each detailing their own line of evidence. Take your pick.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Its your belief not mine why would I care to do "homework" on your beliefs?

As I said, I'm not responsible for your education.

And regardless, I fail to see the point in spending time and energy trying to explain something to someone who already stated to not being interested.

I don't play chess with pidgeons.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Thats fine, its the 21st century and you still believe we came from monkeys.

or....

The 21st century and you still believe we were magically created from dirt and put in a magical garden with magical fruit bearing trees and talking snakes and The Flinstones being an accurate representation of history.

Hiiii-haaa