Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And still...no clue as to the meaning of that verse.
So what? Neither is Abel.
Nobody is disputing that Seth is the lineage in play. Still doesn't mean Adam did not have TWO SONS, Cain and Abel.
and Cain, the tare? Again, who are you kidding? A lot of the inhabitants didn't make it past the flood and had their lineage presented.
All have sin. All have sinned. No one is righteous, no not one.
There is no doubt whatsoever that the ploy being put in play is that a certain genetic line, that of Cain, is not only evil, but the genetic offspring of Satan, which claim is and remains patently absurd.
All have sinned. All have sin.
Sin is of the devil.
That is not a matter of a certain line of genetics, as valiantly as you are trying to make it so.
s
Just as I said, here is what one gets when one provides Scripture to back up their challenges of YeShallTread. She automatically asserts that they do not know what the verse means, and thus have misinterpreted it. Yet still, she engages in no interpretation herself. A lot of good that did.
It wasn't a challenge to anything I have said...nothing at all.
It doesn't deal with the first earth age, the seed of the serpent, or anything being discussed. The poster improperly applies that verse.
Abel was slain so didn't produce a child in the line to Christ. Cain was still kicking and yet...not listed.
It is written that Adam had "sons and daughters" after Seth. Cain isn't there for a reason. The lineage of Cain is given separately for a reason.
Yes, Cain the tare...the first of many.
You are wrong about that Squint. Yes, all have sinned but there are many righteous.
You are not reading the verse properly for those that are not righteous...no not one...refers to THE TARES.
I know nothing of the Jehovah's witness. Do they deny that Father and Son are One?
Ahh, so Squint was right. You follow Murray and his two creations or at least share his beliefs.No. On the sixth day God created man. After the seventh day of rest He formed Adam. The sixth day creation is not Adam.
So you accuse Squint of misinterpretation, yet in return you still do not engage in the interpretation of the Scripture that you provide?
How is one to know that this is not just the blanket statement you will give to anyone who provides Scripture to back a challenge of what you have posted?
He called their name Adam, because Eve (her spirit, He didn't breathe in Eve) was still in Him (man and wife are one), He called them mankind, because out of one all mankind came.Genesis 5:1-2 This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made He him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.
This chapter gives the generations of Adam, the man Adam. Also notice that Adam (without the article) is not eth ha adam or the man Adam. Rather, it refers to mankind that was created male and female. God mentions them and then....God speaks of the particular man Adam and his lineage....5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:
Please notice....CAIN IS NOT LISTED!!! The line of Cain, the tares, is given in his very own genealogy. Do you wonder why?
Ahh, so Squint was right. You follow Murray and his two creations or at least share his beliefs.
I guess it couldn't possibly be that the text explains creation and then goes back to focus on mankind as that's the point of Genesis (God's love for man).
Chapter One is simply a general overview. Chapter two is not a second happening but the beginning of the story focused on man. If it is then Adam was given a false name by God.
I'll not call you racist. I have no evidence to support such. But I will say you share the belief if many a racist including the KKK. Two separate accounts is also what they teach. that God created all the evil races and later made the sweet lily white Adam: of the supreme and clean race.
This is what happens when we discover that we can't read Genesis in a complete literal fashion. We either need to understand that God doesn't give us all the details or invent another story.
So I just have to ask: Did God create woman the first time out of Man's rib or was she just popped in out of thin air? I mean He created them male and female.
He called their name Adam, because Eve (her spirit, He didn't breathe in Eve) was still in Him (man and wife are one), He called them mankind, because out of one all mankind came.
It makes no sense. First He creates millions of people, mankind, then Adam and Eve, who brought forth a son of satan,
here we have 3 different races of mankind now and a son of satan wouldn't be called a man, the giants weren't called man either.
Of course Cain is not listed, the Messiah came through Seth.
He didn't interpret anything....He misapplied it. As I said, it has no bearing on the topic under discussion although it is certainly important.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?