Was the flood in Genesis a literal, global Flood? Or is it something else?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Was the flood in Genesis a literal, global Flood? Or is it something else?
I would recommend reading this.
Wow...I'm floored and baffled at the responses in the thread! Jeez, so much for the bible being under divine inspiration :/
Wow...I'm floored and baffled at the responses in the thread! Jeez, so much for the bible being under divine inspiration :/
So, you're saying that a divinely inspired passage which talks of a flood can only mean that there was a flood. It can't be possible that God could use a story to convey meaning through a story without the story being true. Is that beyond God?
Not any different than a story about a man being crucified, placed in a tomb, and coming back to life after three days. Many folks take this story literally, too, but a lot of others see past the absurdity and find the actual truth that God intended for us.
There is nothing in the Mosaic books that yields its meaning on the surface, he states. No rabbi ever read Genesis literally until modern times! I mean, that is just such a non-Jewish thing to do.
Differemce being that your example comes in the Gospels, which are intended to present a biography/history of what happened by people who lived at such a time, into a Greek context.
The story of the flood was written by people many years after those who believe in the event claimed it to happen, in an introduction to the law which does not claim to be a history into a Jewish Hebrew context. As the Chief Rabbi (who is a reliable source on things relating to the Torah) said recently
So, you're saying that a divinely inspired passage which talks of a flood can only mean that there was a flood. It can't be possible that God could use a story to convey meaning through a story without the story being true. Is that beyond God?