• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Was the Great Pyramid Built Before Noah's Flood?

DialecticSkeptic

Reformed
Jul 21, 2022
439
288
Vancouver
✟65,128.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Was he supposed to lead other human beings?

Yes, I believe he was. If the last Adam was a covenant servant as prophet, priest, and king, then maybe the first Adam was, too (since he was a type of Christ). Regarding the office of prophet, God spoke unto Adam alone, a word which he would then have to communicate to his wife and family and beyond (cf. Deut 6:6-7). Communicating God's word to others is a prophetic responsibility for those created in the image of God. However, beyond this, there is also evidence in the text of Adam's responsibility as priest and king (esp. Gen 2:15) which was unique to him as a type of Christ—and was lost in the fall, I believe.

For a deep dive into this subject, see Joel R. Beeke and Paul M. Smalley, eds., Reformed Systematic Theology: Volume 2 - Man and Christ (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2020). See the section "God's Covenant with Adam, Part 3."
 
Reactions: Andrewn
Upvote 0

Bob Crowley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2015
3,874
2,419
71
Logan City
✟966,664.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I'm not very interested in the topic, but if the pyramids were built before the flood, there should be evidence of flood damage, not only externally but also internally eg. dried mud on floors and walls, sarcophaguses covered with mud, items in poor repair, water damage from prolonged immersion etc.

If there's no evidence of flood damage, then assuming the flood was world wide and not just Mesopotamian, then they must have been built after the Biblical flood.
 
Reactions: The Barbarian
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,409
3,198
Hartford, Connecticut
✟358,353.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Well, and if the flood occurred after the pyramids we're built, we might expect all Egyptians to have died as well, in the flood, but of course Egyptians are still here and alive today, or their children in this case.
 
Upvote 0

Laconia79

Active Member
Dec 5, 2021
201
97
46
Indianapolis
✟13,986.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The flood happened if you follow the bible about 4300 years ago give or take a 100 years, the great pyramid of Giza was about 5000 years ago. When you do the math you realize the biblical flood is a myth. Now was there a flood that is the basis of the story sure...were the black see is right now there was a settlement. 10000 years ago the end of the last ice age, Ice melts the sea floods the area, to the ancient people it would have been the end of the world. In probability all of the flood stories start from that. Also human civilization started in that part of the world.
 
Reactions: Andrewn
Upvote 0

DialecticSkeptic

Reformed
Jul 21, 2022
439
288
Vancouver
✟65,128.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Well, and if the flood occurred after the pyramids we're built, we might expect all Egyptians to have died as well, in the flood, but of course Egyptians are still here and alive today, or their children in this case.
 

Attachments

  • D2QLKbdXgAAPtOR.jpeg
    45.7 KB · Views: 31
Upvote 0

Laconia79

Active Member
Dec 5, 2021
201
97
46
Indianapolis
✟13,986.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I guess God's judgement just wasn't significant enough for their historical accounts...
There is no historical evidence. A flood of that magnitude would leave signs. The Pyramids would have been wiped out. A world flood would have ripped the earth apart and destroyed any human evidence of existence. I and most reasonably intelligent people believe the bible is a book that is part myth, historical fact, and guide on to have a relationship with god. Was there a flood that is the basis for the great flood yes. Look at the Black Sea...it used to be a human settlement and then as the ice from the ice age melted Water came rushing in. Considering the human Civilizations started in the part of the world its most likely the basis of the flood story. And for people of the time it would have been the wrath of god. But as for any world wide flood in the last 10000 there is none...that is not a theory that is proven fact. Carbon dating is almost on spot for the first 50k years, the old settlements go back farther than that....the great flood would have wiped them out. Honestly there is no actual proof for the bible...much of it has been debunked. Geology, Biology, Astronomy, archeology have come far enough to debunk much of religion. It is not a matter of a fact, it is a matter of faith. I believe cause I have seen stuff that science can not explain. I believe because I want to see the people I love again.
 
Upvote 0

DialecticSkeptic

Reformed
Jul 21, 2022
439
288
Vancouver
✟65,128.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
You haven't provided any evidence of how long Adam lived in the garden.

Update: In the first 130 years Adam and Eve were exiled from the garden, had Cain and Abel, Cain slew Abel and was banished by God, and sometime later they had Seth (Genesis 5:1-3).
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,268
2,995
London, UK
✟1,004,385.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

The dating of the Great Pyramid relies heavily on radiocarbon dating which is not 100% reliable. Also as any Egyptologist worth his salt will tell you Egyptian history was rewritten by just about every Pharoah around themselves including dating schemes and finding the truth in all their convenient lies is a big challenge.
 
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,353
13,121
78
✟436,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
The dating of the Great Pyramid relies heavily on radiocarbon dating which is not 100% reliable.

Nothing humans do is 100% reliable. However, your notion that humans can't know anything because we can never be 100% sure, is complete hooey. The age was first determined by archaeological and textual evidence, and only secondarily confirmed by radiocarbon data.
 
Reactions: FireDragon76
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,268
2,995
London, UK
✟1,004,385.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Yes but that archaeological and textual evidence is controversial as are many of the conclusions of Egyptology because of the continual historical revisionism that took place in Egyptian history. Herodotus and later Greek commentators all gave a much later date.
 
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,353
13,121
78
✟436,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian

Because Herodutus and later Greek commentators had better instruments and more texts than modern scholars? Do you realize that it's roughly the same amount of time between Herodotus and the present as it was from the time the pyramids were built to Herodotus?
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,268
2,995
London, UK
✟1,004,385.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Both eras are guessing on the basis of hearsay.
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,353
13,121
78
✟436,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Both eras are guessing on the basis of hearsay.

It seems rather odd to consider things like paleomagnetic data and radioisotope testing as "hearsay."
 
Reactions: FireDragon76
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,499
1,331
72
Sebring, FL
✟835,777.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat


Mindlight, it is good to talk to you again.


I get the impression that you didn’t read post #2. It explains how astronomers have confirmed what archaeologists know about when the three pyramids at Giza were built. Later pharaohs may have wanted to change history but they couldn’t move the stars!
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,268
2,995
London, UK
✟1,004,385.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

There is nothing definite about the usage of those 2 stars as the method. It is perfectly possible they used the sun at solstice method and were slightly off each time. People overestimate Egyptian astrologers/ wise men throughout history as the Bible records
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Another interesting tidbit is some ancient Hebrew literature identifies Melchizedek as Shem (Noah's son) with "Melchizedek" being a title.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,499
1,331
72
Sebring, FL
✟835,777.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Another interesting tidbit is some ancient Hebrew literature identifies Melchizedek as Shem (Noah's son) with "Melchizedek" being a title.


We can’t add every Hebrew folktale to the Bible. In Hebrews we find:

This Melchizedek was king of Salem and priest of God Most
High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings
and blessed him,
and Abraham gave him a tenth of everything. First, his name
means “king of righteousness”; then also, “king of Salem”
means “king of peace”.
Without father or mother, without genealogy, without
beginning of days or end of life, like the Son of God he
remains a priest for ever.

Hebrews 7:1-3 NIV


Since Hebrews says that Melchizedek has no genealogy, any attempt to give him one is contradicting the Bible.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 10, 2019
691
269
56
North Augusta
✟61,068.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
While I do not believe the Hebrew account correct, it does not discount Scripture either. There was no genealogy in Scripture. This does not mean the contemporaries of Melchizedek were unaware of his genealogy.
 
Upvote 0

mindlight

See in the dark
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2003
14,268
2,995
London, UK
✟1,004,385.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It seems rather odd to consider things like paleomagnetic data and radioisotope testing as "hearsay."

I was talking about the historical evidence.

Paleomagnetic data analysis lacks precision and the samples examined are usually all over the place on the scatter graphs I have seen. It is hard to see how this supports your case. Also, there is some skepticism in the scientific community about the overall reliability of the method.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...eliable_A_critical_analysis_of_paleomagnetism

Radioisotope testing assumes that no daughter element was present in the original sample, and may be subject to the distortions of inputs and outputs over years of weathering, sand storms etc, and there are some glaring examples of the unreliability of the method. The results usually come in the form of scattered samples sitting at different places on the graph from which a broad average or trend is discerned. That is not certainty.
 
Upvote 0