Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think every christian should conform themselves to look as much like the rest of the world as possible, since many people don't tell you tattoos are addicting and most don't stop with just one, I personally think you should go extreme and have a Jesus face tattooed right over your face, NOW THAT WOULD BE MAKING A STATEMENT! just make sure you go to a reputable tattoo parlor, dirty needles are a nasty thing these days........while your in the tattoo place you will have a great opportunity to use your God given Spiritual Discernment......look around the room does the art work reflect godliness or things of the demonic, take a look in the tattoo book what is a popular tat these days........Oh an just so you understand, demons are alot like gang members they always tag their turf!
No one is going to lighten up about that photo Bella. See what I mean JC? That post was just a reality check not an insult or a crime. Bella, u must not take anyone's feedback seriously bc we are all trying to tell u that NOTHING about the image u've posted up is a joke. This is a Christian forum. Ur actions have negatively impacted other people's faith and their walk with Christ and u continue to jeopardize their salvation intentionally. None of this is becoming of a proverbs 31 woman or a true ambassador of Christ. So JC get it? Just bc u can say u've been saved for 5 years doesn't mean u were doing a good job at it in all of that time bc Bella certainly isn't.
"On His robe and on His thigh He has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS." (Rev. 19:16)
I've been debating on posting this verse, I finally decided to. This verse could be taken to mean that when Jesus comes back He will have a name on His leg...
Here's another:
"They will see His face, and His name will be on their foreheads." (Rev. 22:4)
Could these verses mean that some tattoos could be considered "good"?
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+11:19&version=102http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+11:19&version=102http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+11:19&version=102http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+11:19&version=102
...Was posting this necessary?
Obviously it was. I didn't see y posting what u said was necessary. It made no sense. U asked the question does it mean tattooing is good in some circumstances? That was the answer. NO.
So eating pig products and shellfish are spiritually evil?You just won't admit that it is evil, would you? May the Lord judge here whether what I speak is right. EVERYTHING that the pagan countries did were in essence spiritually evil, and this INCLUDED tattooing.
No your comment was not necessary and it was a dishonest statement.
Back to my post: The point I am trying to make is that in eternity in some mystical manner we cannot understand yet, we are to be spiritually tattooed on our foreheads with the name of Jesus and the Father. Does this make tattooing our bodies in the physical OK? I don't know, but I'm just saying that the bible speaks of marking our bodies in a spiritual sense for God (see: circumcision).
SOS, supernaturally. That forehead statement doesn't require pin and permanent ink. Please read ur bible more.
Didn't say it did, it is still a MARK (in this case a name) on the body just like circumcision was. Read your bible more.
If u realize that was of supernatural means then TATTOOS with permanent INK and marker AREN'T justified by that passage u posted. Duh. Ur argument was that some man-made tattoos are acceptable to GOD. The answer is no they aren't.
If u realize that was of supernatural means then TATTOOS with permanent INK and marker AREN'T justified by that passage u posted. Duh. Ur argument was that some man-made tattoos are acceptable to GOD. The answer is no they aren't.
So now, SOS, u admit u don't know scripture. U don't realize the passage U pointed out to justify your argument wasn't referring to man-made tattoos. Ur saying that passage means we can go down to the local parlor and get tatted up and Christ wouldn't have a problem with it bc of what it says in Revelation. U don't see how ur misconstruing scripture here?
How many times are Tattoos mentioned in the Bible or did Jesus say anything about them?