Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Take a moment if you will and look up, Cambrian Explosion.
It is something inexplicable to this day in the field of Evolutionary theory.
A quote from Darwin would help you make that point. In any case, it is moot because even if the Cambrian Explosion vexed Darwin, it doesn't vex evolutionary biologists any more.It doesn't appear you do. Or you wouldn't ask what vexed Darwin about it to the day he died. The CE explains itself. Evolution is hogwash. The CE just makes it more noticeable.
If you want to dumb Adam down and make him look like some innocent child who didn't know anything
The son of God?How else would characterize someone without childhood learning experiences, living in perfect environment without any hardship, accompanied by one other human,
It doesn't appear you do. Or you wouldn't ask what vexed Darwin about it to the day he died. The CE explains itself. Evolution is hogwash. The CE just makes it more noticeable.
Hmm well the scientific method is observation and experimentation so by that definition alone evolution is not science its a religion.
Millions and millions of years ago in the ocean= long ago and far away which is the beginning of a fairy tale
Hmmm i wonder why the piltdown man or nebraska man hoaxes aren't widely talked about.
It doesn't appear you do. Or you wouldn't ask what vexed Darwin about it to the day he died. The CE explains itself. Evolution is hogwash. The CE just makes it more noticeable.
Probably because Nebraska "man" wasn't a hoax and because Piltdown was outed in 1954 so it's yesterdays news. On the other hand, we have Creationists in 2018 spreading falsehoods like claiming Nebraska "man" was a hoax.
Nebraska Man, Ape of the Western World, First Higher Primate of North America, was considered real.Probably because Nebraska "man" wasn't a hoax ...and because Piltdown was outed in 1954 so it's yesterdays news. On the other hand, we have Creationists in 2018 spreading falsehoods like claiming Nebraska "man" was a hoax.
Does the Fourth? it consists of scientists, you know.I can only conclude that the Third Reich did not exist!
That makes Pluto a 76-year hoax.Well if its reported as truth and isnt than its a hoax.
Are you seriously suggesting that "trex" is an individual?So since we know so much about fossils can anyone tell me how many children trex had. Oh and im not asking for a guess.
In order to be a hoax it has to be reported as truth by someone who knows it isn't.Well if its reported as truth and isnt than its a hoax. Im curious but how do you determine what someone looks like with a single tooth ypu can't. Well atleast that isnt how forensic science works.
Thalidomide?In order to be a hoax it has to be reported as truth by someone who knows it isn't.
Thalidomide?
{On 31 August 2012, Grünenthal chief executive Harald F. Stock who served as the Chief Executive Officer of Grünenthal GmbH from January 2009 to May 28, 2013 and was also a Member of Executive Board until May 28, 2013, apologized for the first time for producing the drug and remaining silent about the birth defects. At a ceremony, Stock unveiled a statue of a disabled child to symbolize those harmed by thalidomide and apologized for not trying to reach out to victims for over 50 years. At the time of the apology, there were 5,000 to 6,000 sufferers still alive. Victim advocates called the apology "insulting" and "too little, too late", and criticized the company for not compensating victims. They also criticized the company for their claim that no one could have known the harm the drug caused, arguing that there were plenty of red flags at the time.}
SOURCE
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?