• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Voting by Mail?

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,151
8,386
✟428,101.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
I get that impression because it is Democrats and Democrat leaning posters on this thread who come up with reasons why we shouldn't control it more. Like having to request a ballot. Whereas it it Republican and Republican leaning poster who are calling for more control.

Thanks for asking
It's not binary. Just because somebody doesn't think that more controls are needed doesn't automatically mean that they think no controls are needed at all.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I get that impression because it is Democrats and Democrat leaning posters on this thread who come up with reasons why we shouldn't control it more.

I can think of plenty of reasons why you shouldn't control it more.

Whereas it it Republican and Republican leaning poster who are calling for more control.

But of course the Republicans want more control over the process by which they could be removed from power.
 
Upvote 0

Ponderous Curmudgeon

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2021
1,477
944
67
Newfield
✟38,862.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
If Democrats and their voters are perceived as being for less restrictive voting rules, perhaps it is because it is Republicans that have tried to make it more difficult to vote (or resisted efforts to make it easier) because they perceive that those most inconvenienced will likely vote against them.
This might be one of those rare instances where their perception jives with reality.

I too have never had a voter ID nor been asked for ID to vote. If my signature is close enough to my prior signature for my registration address that is all we need.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,359
17,924
56
USA
✟461,944.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
This might be one of those rare instances where their perception jives with reality.

I too have never had a voter ID nor been asked for ID to vote. If my signature is close enough to my prior signature for my registration address that is all we need.

Here they generally require a photo ID, and I'd rather they check my face next to my address on my photo ID against the registration book rather than try to determine if two versions of my somewhat sloppy and variable signature match. (One of the poll workers knows I live in the precinct since we share a backyard.)
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,265
✟584,022.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Here they generally require a photo ID, and I'd rather they check my face next to my address on my photo ID against the registration book...

Hmmm. The picture you're using looks a lot like General Sherman, but it might pass the elections board, depending on which state you live in.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,359
17,924
56
USA
✟461,944.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Hmmm. The picture you're using looks a lot like General Sherman, but it might pass the elections board, depending on which state you live in.

It makes voting easier in Georgia.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I was hoping you would share two or three of them.

Well, for starters, Republican presidential candidates have lost the popular vote in 7 out of the last 8 presidential elections, and were it not for the electoral college, the 21st century would have been entirely blue thus far. Clearly making it easier for the people to vote is not in your best interest.

Second, Donald has already spoken on this matter -- Trump says Republicans would ‘never’ be elected again if it was easier to vote -- so it would be a waste of my time to expect a dissenting opinion.
 
Upvote 0

Tiberius Lee

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2017
2,092
2,561
Wisconsin
✟145,622.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Well, for starters, Republican presidential candidates have lost the popular vote in 7 out of the last 8 presidential elections, and were it not for the electoral college, the 21st century would have been entirely blue thus far. Clearly making it easier for the people to vote is not in your best interest.

Second, Donald has already spoken on this matter -- Trump says Republicans would ‘never’ be elected again if it was easier to vote -- so it would be a waste of my time to expect a dissenting opinion.

Some are not interested any of these facts. In the land of “wide spread voted fraud” you can’t use facts and logic. In 2016 eve when Trump won the election, he and some claimed voter fraud and in their mind only people commit voter fraud are those who doesn’t vote for them. You think they will understand facts and logic when they lost? Some of these people are beyond reconciliation. And even if they understand your facts and logic, they would never admit it. Some of these people take ivermectin and give it to their children just to prove you are wrong.
 
Upvote 0

Always in His Presence

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
51,579
18,678
Broken Arrow, OK
✟1,135,365.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Well, for starters, Republican presidential candidates have lost the popular vote in 7 out of the last 8 presidential elections, and were it not for the electoral college, the 21st century would have been entirely blue thus far. Clearly making it easier for the people to vote is not in your best interest.

Second, Donald has already spoken on this matter -- Trump says Republicans would ‘never’ be elected again if it was easier to vote -- so it would be a waste of my time to expect a dissenting opinion.

Clarification please:

Are you indicating that you believe if people voting by mail had to request a ballot and return it with a copy of their voter registration card would result in Republicans gaining the popular vote?
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,359
17,924
56
USA
✟461,944.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Clarification please:

Are you indicating that you believe if people voting by mail had to request a ballot and return it with a copy of their voter registration card would result in Republicans gaining the popular vote?

If that's what you're concerned about, your party could try being more... popular. ( I know it's an odd concept in politics. )
 
Upvote 0

Always in His Presence

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
51,579
18,678
Broken Arrow, OK
✟1,135,365.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If that's what you're concerned about, your party could try being more... popular. ( I know it's an odd concept in politics. )

I have no idea what that means? Your comment makes no sense in relation to my question. If making the mail in ballots traceable and more secure (requiring them being requested and getting a copy of the voters registration with its return, would result in Democrats not winning elections - what does that say about the mass mailing voting and ballot harvesting going on right now?
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,359
17,924
56
USA
✟461,944.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I have no idea what that means? Your comment makes no sense in relation to my question. If making the mail in ballots traceable and more secure (requiring them being requested and getting a copy of the voters registration with its return, would result in Democrats not winning elections - what does that say about the mass mailing voting and ballot harvesting going on right now?

As many have indicated in this thread (but not really me, yet) -- mail balloting doesn't make elections insecure and there are demonstrated ways to conduct such elections.

What mail balloting *does* do is increase turn out by making it easier for more "casual" voters to participate. If the low-participation voters trend against your political leanings and you want to use "difficulty of voting" to keep them out so your preferred candidates can win then the "security" schemes you support really are just "voter suppression". Not sure exactly why TLK Valentine referenced recent "pop. vote" v. EC results other than maybe it illustrates the well of unpopularity the GOP dwells in as it doesn't say anything directly about election security.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Brihaha
Upvote 0

trunks2k

Contributor
Jan 26, 2004
11,369
3,520
43
✟285,241.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I too have never had a voter ID nor been asked for ID to vote. If my signature is close enough to my prior signature for my registration address that is all we need.
Here in PA, it's pretty simple. The first time you vote in a precinct, you need to present some form of identification. That identification can be from a list of photo-id and non-photo id options, including the voter registration card they send when you register to vote in the precinct. Once you do that, you sign the book next to your name and go vote. From then on, any time you vote you just give your name and sign the book next to a copy of your signature from the previous time you voted. Don't need ID again.

Now, where I happen to vote they have asked for ID but not for identification purposes. ID is not required. It was just to make the process of finding you in the books easier. The physical location of where I vote handles a few precincts and several districts. So handing them your ID makes it easier to know what book to look you up in and there's less "Can you spell your name for me please? G as in 'great'? No? Oh, T as in 'tom"?"

The Republican run state assembly passed a voter ID law. That was later thrown out by the state supreme court because the only way one could get a free ID was at a driver's license center. And less than half the state lives less than half an hour from a center that was open more than a couple days a week. That made obtaining an ID an undo burden on people.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Some are not interested any of these facts. In the land of “wide spread voted fraud” you can’t use facts and logic. In 2016 eve when Trump won the election, he and some claimed voter fraud and in their mind only people commit voter fraud are those who doesn’t vote for them. You think they will understand facts and logic when they lost? Some of these people are beyond reconciliation. And even if they understand your facts and logic, they would never admit it. Some of these people take ivermectin and give it to their children just to prove you are wrong.

That would be a third reason.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Clarification please:

Are you indicating that you believe if people voting by mail had to request a ballot and return it with a copy of their voter registration card would result in Republicans gaining the popular vote?

Of course not -- it would result in precisely the opposite, which is why it's not in their best interest to allow it.
 
Upvote 0

Always in His Presence

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
51,579
18,678
Broken Arrow, OK
✟1,135,365.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
As many have indicated in this thread (but not really me, yet) -- mail balloting doesn't make elections insecure and there are demonstrated ways to conduct such elections.

And as I have stated numerous times on this thread - I support mail in Ballots provided

  • The ballot should be requested by the voter - It would be free and easy - by phone, email, online or in person at a post office. Similar to absentee ballots
  • The ballot would be sent directly to the person's home - no duplicates or bad addresses or excess printing.
  • The voter would return the ballot with a copy of their voter ID - which they need to vote in National elections anyway.
Do you object or agree and why?
 
Upvote 0

Always in His Presence

Jesus is the only Way
Site Supporter
Nov 15, 2006
51,579
18,678
Broken Arrow, OK
✟1,135,365.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Of course not -- it would result in precisely the opposite, which is why it's not in their best interest to allow it.

I've never seen a Republican object to it? I have seen objections to mass mailing of ballot and ballot harvesting. Both of which would be addressed through these simple steps.
 
Upvote 0