Any Calvinist writer that grants the spontanious actions of men is not a believer in Calvinism. According the Westminster Confession, there is no spontanious actions as God has preordained whatsovere comes to pass. (See chapter 3)
try reading the confession again , it is very clear that secondary causes (man's will) are intact!
The truth , and I know you cannot see it , is that the free actions of men are all foreordained , yes , all of them.
The very idea is Calvinistic. None but the elect are capable of seeking God. The total depravity of the none elect will prevent them from seeking God. The door was never open for the non-elect, they were never chosen. Thats Calvinism, there are the elect and the non-elect. Predestined before the foundatioins of the world were laid to live in heaven or burn in hell.
First off I am a Christian I am NOT in the habit of Lying and that statement is way off ,,,,,,,, nothing less than a perverse caricature of Calvinism , you really are unable , or unwilling to see it. The door is wide to all , all are welcome invited , God commands all men to repent and trust in Christ , election and reprobation not withstanding!
have a read and learn some basics ;
The denial of the gospel call.
This first and most extreme type of hyper-Calvinism denies that the gospel calls all sinners to repentance and faith. The gospel call (the invitation to come to Christ for salvation—Rev. 22:17; Matt. 11:28-29; Isa. 45:22; 55:1-7) is denied to all but the elect.
Historic Reformed theology notes that there are two different senses in which Scripture uses the word
"call." The apostle Paul usually employs the word to speak of the
effectual call, whereby an elect sinner is sovereignly drawn by God unto salvation. Obviously this "call" applies only to the elect alone (Rom. 8:28-30).
But Scripture also describes a
general call. In Matthew 22:14, Jesus said, "Many are called, but few are chosen." Here, those who are "called" are clearly more in number than the elect. So our Lord is quite obviously using the word "call" in a different sense from how Paul used it in Romans 8:30.
The general call, sometimes known as the
external call, is the call to faith and repentance inherent in the gospel message itself. When the gospel is preached, the general call goes out indiscriminately to all who come under the preaching of the gospel. This call is issued by the preacher as an ambassador of Christ.
The effectual call, sometimes known as the
internal call, is the regenerating work of God in the hearts of His elect, whereby He draws them to Christ and opens their hearts unto faith. This call is for the elect alone and is issued by God alone.
This first variety of hyper-Calvinism denies the general, external call, and insists that the gospel should be preached in a way that proclaims the facts about Christ's work and God's electing grace—without
calling for any kind of response.
This is the worst form of hyper-Calvinism in vogue today. I'd class it as an extremely serious error,
more dangerous than the worst variety of Arminianism. At least the Arminian preaches enough of the gospel for the elect to hear it and be saved. The hyper-Calvinist who denies the gospel call doesn't even believe in calling sinners to Christ. He almost fears to whisper the gospel summons to other
believers, lest anyone accuse him of violating divine sovereignty.
English hyper-Calvinists (most happen to be Baptists), American "Gospel Standard" hypers, and Primitive Baptists have traditionally held to this form of hyper-Calvinism. They generally oppose evangelism of any kind. They would (usually) also embrace all five errors of hyper-Calvinism listed above. Their rhetoric tends to be extremely arrogant and elitist—the natural outgrowth of such theology. Normally they claim that they alone are consistent and true to the doctrines of divine sovereignty, and label every other view "Arminianism" or (lately) "hypo-Calvinism."
An early 18th-century British independent (baptistic) pastor named William Huntington is the godfather of this position. This brand of hyper-Calvinism often also has strong antinomian tendencies, traceable back to Huntington, who denied that the moral law is binding as a rule of life on the Christian. Such antinomianism harmonizes well with hyper-Calvinism's denial of human responsibility. (It is also an extension of the same wrong thinking that denies the preceptive will of God.)
http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/articles/hypercal.htm