- May 19, 2018
- 11,004
- 11,750
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
Who knows exactly what he said and did not say?
It is what others have written about him.
The Bible is God's word...
Upvote
0
Who knows exactly what he said and did not say?
It is what others have written about him.
The Bible is God's word...
Perhaps but the meaning is clear. What was once unclean is now clean.Who knows exactly what he said and did not say?
It is what others have written about him.
Perhaps but the meaning is clear. What was once unclean is now clean.
Which is why ER workers often call them donorcycles.I'm not surprised, how would you fit the ears in? But seriously, people who ride motorcycles always used to make up a disproportionate share of organ donors.
In order for an animal to be considered CLEAN, it needs to CHEW THE CUD and have a SPLIT HOOF. The pig has the SPLIT HOOF but does not CHEW THE CUD, so according to the Bible, it's not an animal those who believe in the Bible, should eat. See Leviticus 11. There is nothing in the Bible that says that it's OK now to eat UNCLEAN animals. That is a misconception that most Christians have.
Doesn't make a hill of beans to me. The physical heart is just a muscle. I don't see what the fuss is about.
Its not human. Its also messing with God's creation.
I know it's not human. But the physical isn't what makes us different from animals.Its not human. Its also messing with God's creation.
Its not human. Its also messing with God's creation.
Then hearts, livers, lungs etc from a human doner can't be allowed. It's 'messing with God's creation'. As is any surgery for that matter. God gave us two lungs so removing one is 'messing with God's creation'. An artifical leg is not human. So that's 'messing with God's creation' as well. Good grief, getting a filling or cutting your toenails could be added to the list.
Its not human. Its also messing with God's creation.
My concern is that the pig whose heart was harvested was specifically genetically modified and bred for this purpose. It seems untoward to me to do that to another living creature, and I expect PETA does not approve. I can only say I don't have enough information at this point to come to a judgement as to whether I approve or not. I don't know much at all about the process used to modify and breed the pig. Nor do I understand why people are so obsessed with living a bit longer and not so much at living a bit better. I can, to a certain degree, understand the argument (perhaps one PETA might put forward) that the human who receives this heart probably abused his body and would be healthier going forward by having taken better care of himself rather than abusing his body and then making another living creature pay the price for that abuse. Of course, we Christians are in the habit of expecting our own sins to be paid for by another.
Why can we not be like children like in Mary Poppins,
and say, "Wow, how did you do that?"
To be sure it is an accomplishment,
often taken for granted.
A surgeon may be doing a complicated heart operation in a building,
at the same time someone gets stabbed in some back alley in the same area.
Which one will make the ten o clock news?
Eating pork is completely different to having its heart pumping away in your chest!
What next? Cows eyeballs in our eye sockets!
Messing with God's creation, as in, using a pigs heart in a human's chest!
We can't because we are adults and understand that adults can be corrupt and do things they ought not be doing. For instance, when an atomic bomb devastated Hiroshima, I don't think "Wow how did you do that?' was the appropriate response. I'm not saying that this is one of those things but as I do not know the process by which the pig became a good donor, I also can't say that it isn't.