"US 'doomed' if creationist president elected: scientists"

[Skaloop]

Torn anal tissue ----- Stretched anal muscles.

There can often be vaginal tearing during heterosexual intercourse. Therefore, clearly, because the penis can damage the vagina, male/female intercourse should not be engaged in by anyone.

 

[mpok1519]

...isnt htis thread about the president?

 

[MacCoyle]

...isnt htis thread about the president?

It hath evolved since then.

Punbelieveable

 

[mpok1519]

strange...

 

[necroforest]

...isnt htis thread about the president?

Yeah; we're on Clinton now

 

[mpok1519]

so, it progressed from presidency, to evolution, to creationism, to homosexuality to sodomy?

weird...

 

[EnemyPartyII]

There can often be vaginal tearing during heterosexual intercourse. Therefore, clearly, because the penis can damage the vagina, male/female intercourse should not be engaged in by anyone.

quit so... if degree of harm=degree of sinfulness in sexual relations, homosexual females are the only righteous sexual practitioners... lesbian sex is way safer than heterosexual sex

 

[Skaloop]

so, it progressed from presidency, to evolution, to creationism, to homosexuality to sodomy?

weird...

And next onto oral sex (it's simmering in there already), then to the first Clinton presidency, a little hop over to the possible next Clinton presidency, and BAM! Circle complete!

 

[EnemyPartyII]

And next onto oral sex (it's simmering in there already), then to the first Clinton presidency, a little hop over to the possible next Clinton presidency, and BAM! Circle complete!

Nah, I can't see Hilary getting up... though seriously, between Hilary and Huckabee... talk about a rock and a hard place/frying pan to fire... choose the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" analogy of your choice

 

[Skaloop]

Nah, I can't see Hilary getting up... though seriously, between Hilary and Huckabee... talk about a rock and a hard place/frying pan to fire... choose the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" analogy of your choice

I don't really see it either (although as a Canadian, it's less of an issue for me), but I wanted to put in a clear step between Slick Willy and the current presidential race. Just to avoid any of questions about "Hey, where's the transitional between a previous presidency and the upcoming presidency? No one's ever observed a jump from ex-two-term-president to future president! It's a violation of the twenty-second law of thermo-amendments! And if Bill Clinton became president, why is there still Bill Clinton?" and the like.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

I don't really see it either (although as a Canadian, it's less of an issue for me), but I wanted to put in a clear step between Slick Willy and the current presidential race. Just to avoid any of questions about "Hey, where's the transitional between a previous presidency and the upcoming presidency? No one's ever observed a jump from ex-two-term-president to future president! It's a violation of the twenty-second law of thermo-amendments! And if Bill Clinton became president, why is there still Bill Clinton?" and the like.

I like that...

not to mention that Bill Clinton's are obviously ireducibly complex!

 

[John1222]

"So what, most of the presidents in the past didn't believe in atomic theory. You can't present them as supporters of creationism if they didn't have the evidence for evolution we have now.
And I question most of the modern presidents you've mentioned as creationists. It took me all of 5 minutes to find that Jimmy Carter was most definitely NOT a creationist and would be insulted by the accusation."

The names I posted have openly admitted to being creationists,regardless of wheteher or not you are embarrased by it.Jimmy Carter has also openly admitted to being a creationuist.I suspect that your defintion of creationist is not the same as the definition creationist use.I would think if someone admits to being a creationist,you have no choice but to accept it,unlss you can get Jimmy Carter to admit he lied.

 

[Skaloop]

I like that...

not to mention that Bill Clinton's are obviously ireducibly complex!

Plus, presidents may change, but they're always still presidents. Has anyone ever seen a president become a prime minister? NO! They're different kinds!

 

[EnemyPartyII]

Plus, presidents may change, but they're always still presidents. Has anyone ever seen a president become a prime minister? NO! They're different kinds!

love it.

Not to mention no one alive today was a witness to how the first president was created, therefore, God did it, as all other evidence is merely suposition

 

[John1222]

[so, it progressed from presidency, to evolution, to creationism, to homosexuality to sodomy?

weird...]


Apparantly some people believe those are all synomous

 

[MacCoyle]

The names I posted have openly admitted to being creationists,regardless of wheteher or not you are embarrased by it.Jimmy Carter has also openly admitted to being a creationuist.I suspect that your defintion of creationist is not the same as the definition creationist use.I would think if someone admits to being a creationist,you have no choice but to accept it,unlss you can get Jimmy Carter to admit he lied.

Carter is what we call a Theistic Evolutionist. He calls himself a creationist but also believes in Evolution. He is also a champion of of Gay rights and same-sex marriage. That got his basically kicked out of mainstream Christianity. Carter is very intelligent.

 

[Maxwell511]

If I recall correctly, I've made a more general claim than this: specifically that many atheists employ a religious treatment of the natural sciences (including evolution). As evidence I have cited the American Atheists Logo, which, as the group specifically states, has a clear basis in science. Here we see that an atheist group gives special reverence to science, which in some sense resembles religiosity.

Remember that time you said that God plays an active continuous role in all processes and I asked you what role does God play in the path taken by a charged particle in an electric field?

You didn't answer it. Could you answer it now?

You seem to make lots of claims but in general you don't attempt to back them up with the same standards that your own professional work would require.

 

[Dal M.]

Jimmy Carter has also openly admitted to being a creationuist.

ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- Former President Jimmy Carter said Friday he was embarrassed by the Georgia Department of Education proposal to eliminate the word "evolution" from the state's curriculum.

"As a Christian, a trained engineer and scientist, and a professor at Emory University, I am embarrassed by Superintendent Kathy Cox's attempt to censor and distort the education of Georgia's students," Carter said in a written statement.

Cox explained the reasoning at a news conference on Thursday and in a statement posted on the Department of Education Web site, saying that the concepts of evolution would remain in the curriculum.

"The unfortunate truth is that 'evolution' has become a controversial buzzword that could prevent some from reading the proposed biology curriculum," Cox said in her statement.

She added: "We don't want the public or our students to get stuck on a word when the curriculum actually includes the most widely accepted theories for biology. Ironically, people have become upset about the exclusion of the word again, without having read the document."

But Carter said dropping the word would leave Georgia's high school graduates "with a serious handicap as they enter college or private life where freedom of speech will be permitted."

Carter also predicted ridicule for the state, along with discredit on Georgia's university system.

"The existing and long-standing use of the word 'evolution' in our state's textbooks has not adversely affected Georgians' belief in the omnipotence of God as creator of the universe," Carter said. "There can be no incompatibility between Christian faith and proven facts concerning geology, biology, and astronomy.

"There is no need to teach that stars can fall out of the sky and land on a flat Earth in order to defend our religious faith."

http://www.cnn.com/2004/EDUCATION/01/30/georgia.evolution/index.html - Jan. 30, 2004

If this man is a creationist, then the word "creationist" is entirely meaningless.

 

[InTheCloud]

As a Christian, a trained engineer and scientist, and a professor at Emory University, I am embarrassed by Superintendent Kathy Cox's attempt to censor and distort the education of Georgia's students," Carter said in a written statement.

God bless him.
First time I agree with him in something. Well, I support same sex unions too. So add two.

Sadly, in foreign policy he still is a moron.

 

[LittleNipper]

I was just about to say, anal sex and oral sex are not restricted only to homosexuals. Heterosexuals do participate in the same forms of sex.

The question might be asked if such sexual practices are loving.