Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
that overwhelms you to the point of losing your will to live
I know you would think that I've flipped out if I had to say to you that I've personally seen Jesus Christ, and that I speak to God every day.
will do for sure
you know that this is as true as it is the other way around, right?
there are just as much christians who are 'close minded' aswel. they are afraid to even think there mightn't be a God as this would mean the downfall of everything they are thaught to believe in?
thaught, indeed, as many christians got their believe "hammered" in their heads when they were (and still are) children.
you dont have to worry, im not going to stop thinking / learning.
sincerely,
Thomas.
For example, evolution does not teach about the origin of the universe nor does it teach about the beginning of life. Evolution is a theory regarding how the species came to be after the beginning by observable and scientific evidence. The thing is that it is still a theory and much is yet to be proven.
The ethics of Christianity is indeed defined by the revealed word of God in the scriptures, however, there are varies interpretations regarding issues like homosexuality, abortion, contraceptives, etc. For example, I am a Baptist and my church does not see condoms as evil but the Catholic Church does teach against contraceptives. These issues are secondary to the belief in the risen Christ.
The love of God that you briefly touched on is indeed a love of such magnitude that our finite minds can not fully grasp it. God sent His only son to die for our sins so that if we believe in Christ then we have the hope of salvation. Without this loving sacrifice we would not have had that hope. God will save those that he chooses and not any one of us can say that another person won't be saved. Can God save homosexuals? Yes, he can. Will He? No one knows.
I know... that was one of the things that turned me off Christianity for a long time. If our faith can't stand up to thinking and questioning, then it isn't worth very much!
I am glad of that.
Thomas, may I ask you something? Are you just taking on the opinions of others at atheistic sites, or are you reaching conclusions after a lot of thought and deliberation?
Because acceding to the beliefs of others because they sound good is just another form of faith. Do you see what I mean?
the rhetoric of someone else without actually considering the pros and cons of what they claim to believe.
We're all entitled to choose our own path... it really is God that has given us free will, and He allows us to choose to be away from Him if we so desire.
But whatever you choose, choose it because you've analysed and genuinely considered, not because you saw someone say something that sounded cool on a site about why God won't heal amputees.
Take care
[/COLOR]
[COLOR=#008000[QUOTE]][/COLOR]
what are the pros and cons of the truth?
and I mean the truth based on logic and crystalclear thinking, and coming to conclude that there is no God..
once again, I dont believe any of this nonsense, sorry.
There's no actual proof of the underlying philosophies like modernism that demand actual proofs. The lens through which we view evidence can't, itself, be proved by evidence. The only reason athesist philosophies get away with this is that they avoid making the fundamentals of their epistimology explicit so it isn't exposed to the same rigour as they want to expose others.there are more things that turn me off christianity...
as:
there is no actual proof.
Eh? Most of the world's Christians accept that not all of the bible is literal.most christians are VERY close-minded and cant open their eyes for anything that doesnt literally sticks to the bible..
The world is in a mess. Why wouldn't the creator God want to put that right?being so "naive" that God is here to help us.
reply to Andreha
not going to happen. and if this would happen (against all odds) God wouldnt be my way out, as I dont and probably wont ever believe in him.
have you / do you then? please let me know if you get this
(if I dont get a reply in the next few days, ill PM you this as I appreciate the way you tend to talk to me
So people of faith don't base anything on logic or crystal clear thinking?
Faith in something or someone is nonsense,
I'm expecting the "you Christians are delusion idiots" line anytime now.
Instead of "how" maybe they should focus on "why". Logic and science and "crystal clear thinking" may give you some of the hows, but it will not give you the whys, the overarching reasons for everything that exists.
But if you are happy with just the surface how, then fine. Be happy. But don't think that your brain is functioning at any higher a level than the brains of people with faith. Its truely insulting.
There's no actual proof of the underlying philosophies like modernism that demand actual proofs. The lens through which we view evidence can't, itself, be proved by evidence. The only reason athesist philosophies get away with this is that they avoid making the fundamentals of their epistimology explicit so it isn't exposed to the same rigour as they want to expose others.
The world is in a mess. Why wouldn't the creator God want to put that right?
Hey, Truely Unsure
Yes, I know it sounds a bit strange, but I've had those experiences, which changed me. As a child, I was attacked by demonic forces (my best way of explaining it, I suppose). The thing was that I had nobody to talk to about it. I didn't even have the words to try and explain it. I just stopped wanting to live anymore. This thing would come after me every single night, and terrify me. Then, one day, my 1st grade teacher told me about Jesus. My first thought was to ask Him - he wouldn't need fancy words, but help me. That same night, the same scary stuff happened, and I just asked Him to help. What happened after that will stay with me all the days of my life. I felt waves of energy rippling through my body, and an overflowing with joy came over me. The next moment, my soul left my body, and I was standing in an empty dark void. In front of me, I saw a figure standing, that had a brilliant light shine out of Him. The light wasn't natural, because one could look straight into it without getting one's eyes hurt. I felt this powerful passionate love and peace. As I stood there, speechless, I felt all my burdens disappear. Back then, I had no idea what was happening. Well, a long time afterwards, I realised what must have happened. And, honestly, those attacks have disappeared right then, 32 years ago.
Since then, I've stared hearing the voice of God, speaking to me. It is that which encouraged me through life, and kept me going - as I had a very lonely childhood.
Anyhow, I know this sounds like something out of a science fiction novel. I do usually hesitate to share this, as there have been fellow Christians who rebuked and rejected me because of this. They even told me I have devils inside me, or that I am under their control. It hurts. Sheesh.
Anyhow, I suppose the point I'd like to make is this. It sucks to be alone when life is getting too much to handle on your own. Sometimes, we just need a friend to talk to. Not someone who preaches at you. I know how *irritating* it can be when someone just insists on preaching to you, instead of just listening, and offering unconditional love. I'd like to reaffirm my promise, that I won't try to convert you. I'd just like to offer some ears that will listen to you, and offer encouragement - as that is something we all do need. Not preaching. When people hurt, they need love, not preaching. It's the love that heals, not the preaching. By now, Christians should know this...
Regards
Andre
I couldnt agree more, If somehow I could change my username...Truely Unsure is truly the most misnamed person here.
you mightn't believe me, but I really didnt know what to believe when I joined this forum.I do not think he was ever truly unsure of what he did or didn't believe, not matter what he said in his OP.
Thankfully, God gave us the gift of freewill - meaning that we get to choose whether to believe of not. If TU chooses not to believe that is his right. I will not judge his life, I will not call it worthless or pathetic or superficial. I will just call it his.
I just wish he could show the same respect and not try to convince me that my life is based on a belief in something fake - especially since he has no proof to back up the claim. Just because you do not believe in something does not make it unreal. Many people still don't believe man walked on the moon or that Elvis is dead - doesn't change the facts.
Spoken like a true fundamentalist - unwilling to examine one's own epistemology. The underlying philosophy of science and the enlightenment cannot be the result of it's own conclusions - that would be circular. You can't establish them by research because you need them first to do the research. You can't examine a lens through itself.what's modernism?
I see it this way: the philosophers get away with it, because its the truth.
the fundamentals of these studies are based on research.
not on more guessing / imagination
The internet is not reflective of Christianity as a whole.ah, well that could be right. but if what you're saying is true, ive been having some bad luck with the christians i spoke to on the internet lolEh? Most of the world's Christians accept that not all of the bible is literal.
you say it yourself. why doesnt he put it right? if he's real and legit, howcome he doesnt step up to help us?
Spoken like a true fundamentalist - unwilling to examine one's own epistemology. The underlying philosophy of science and the enlightenment cannot be the result of it's own conclusions - that would be circular. You can't establish them by research because you need them first to do the research. You can't examine a lens through itself.
The internet is not reflective of Christianity as a whole.
He has. The structure of the bible can be looked at as a play in 5 acts:
You ask why God has not acted - the bible is exactly the story of how he has acted and is acting.
- Genesis 1-2: how God intended the world to be
- Genesis 3-5: what went wrong including...
- Genesis 6-9 (Noah): the explanation of why evil cannot be simply wiped out without also wiping out what is good about creation
- Genesis 12-Malachi: The beginning of God's plan to put the world right through Israel culminating in...
- The Gospels: The climax of God putting creation right in the incarnation, death and resurrection of Jesus
- Act-Revelation: The beginning of the story of the church called to live between that action of putting the world right and that coming to fruition
- Revelation 21-22, 1 Cor 15, bits of Isaiah: Glimpses of what it will look like when that rescuing is consumated.
very roughly speaking a label for the 19th and 20th century western world's peculiar way of thinking about thingswhats modernism
The art of thinking about knowledge and how we know things.and epistemology?
Any house has a foundation. Modern science sits on a foundation of philosophy, assumptions, ways of looking at things, that go back to the enlightenment. Those assumptions are rarely made explicit in the modern world, let alone put up for examination, yet they are they foundations that post-enlightenment reasoning and more specifically science rely on, not the results of such reasoning.I dont really get it... isnt just the urge of trying to prove / disprove things enough as the philosophy of science?
Good. Keep that in mind always.I figured, yeah
Much of it we know is quite remarkably accurate to the ancient manuscripts. The key event on which it all hangs or falls (the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth) is, in fact, as well attested as virtually any other event in 1st century history. It's only rejected because of an assumption of naturalism. 'It cannot have happened therefore it did not happen, therefore any other explanation for the data is better than "it did happen"'once again, I dont believe the bible.
its nothing conrete, its a book composed of all kinds of letters / stories wich were probably copied like 50times by people who didnt even live in the same century...
By the people of God, a lot.howmuch of his "help", according to bible, has really been noticed?
But that's the whole point - we are not (yet) at the stage where it should be blatantly obvious (except in the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth and in the lives of those who give their allegience to his Kingdom).I mean, how much of it is "concrete", as in something that really is here, helping us to solve the mess on this planet?
not much, if you'd ask me...
Hey Andre, first of all thanks for your promise, I appreciate it.
second, I believe you when you talk about what has happened.
Im not judging you or anything, but I do have my opinion of it.
*the christians who told you you were possessed by devils are just mere idiots, dont pay attention to them.
*Im not calling you a lier, but I dont believe you really met God / Christ.
I dont know what happened. perhaps it was a real vivid dream based on the story of christianity you heared about in school. (dreams are often based on experiences / your thoughts right before you fall asleep)
thats my opinion, im not trying to convince you your meeting with God was imaginary, this is just what I think of it.
Ive got the same goal as you, im not here to preach, just to talk
when I ever get into some trouble, I'll find someone to talk to.
this wont be God. It will be a close friend / family member / someone as yourself
talk to you soon,
Thomas.
well, you're right about the enlightment and the assumptions.Any house has a foundation. Modern science sits on a foundation of philosophy, assumptions, ways of looking at things, that go back to the enlightenment. Those assumptions are rarely made explicit in the modern world, let alone put up for examination, yet they are they foundations that post-enlightenment reasoning and more specifically science rely on, not the results of such reasoning.
Much of it we know is quite remarkably accurate to the ancient manuscripts. The key event on which it all hangs or falls (the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth) is, in fact, as well attested as virtually any other event in 1st century history. It's only rejected because of an assumption of naturalism. 'It cannot have happened therefore it did not happen, therefore any other explanation for the data is better than "it did happen"'
well, thats the major difference between us I guessOur ways of looking at the world aren't founded on proof, but on attempts to make sense of the stories we hear and experience.
By the people of God, a lot.
But that's the whole point - we are not (yet) at the stage where it should be blatantly obvious (except in the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth and in the lives of those who give their allegience to his Kingdom).
Hey Thomas
Thanks for your reply, man. I'll always welcome you to chat. Sometimes we really just need a friend to listen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?