Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well the orthodox view is not that God is out to destroy mankind or any individual, but that He is out to save each of us from ourselves. So from my view at least, it would appear there were other fundamental issues with what you heard in that Church - and probably much of it based on scaring people straight. Not a good ploy.I understand what your saying, and believe it or not I actually agree. After all there is nothing new under the sun right?
And like Jugghead, I also would like to apologize if I have been harsh in my answers towards you, patience is something I don't always walk in.
As far as UR is concerned, I would just like to say that it did not come easy for me to accept. There were all those scriptures that literally out right contradicted this new idea. And I struggled with them for a long time. But through the yrs. it has become more obvious to me, that the reason for that struggle was because those same scriptures when I read them was preconceived in my mind already as to what they meant because I was raised in the Pentecostal Church and taught from a very young age of what they meant. And this was very hard to shake off, and receive anything new that The Spirit was trying to show me. But when I come to realize that God is not out to destroy the man, but everything IN the man that has opposed himself and separated us from Him, that's when all those opposing scriptures came into balance.
We have no idea how strong our preconceived images and thoughts are when we read those scriptures, until we allow Him to strip us of them, it is the very thing that keeps one from receiving The Truth.
Thanks for that.If men have no respect for the authority of the Father and they have no respect for His law, they will take advantage of the kindness and the forgiveness of sins by the Father and continue in the way of sin. They think they can do anything and get away with it if they are going to be saved anyway, but that is to their own destruction .... they sacrifice a pure unadulterated relationship with Christ for the temporary satisfaction of the flesh. This is why I believe the truth has to stay hidden until God calls them. Respect for His authority and law have to come before the truth (Christ).
Faith comes first, then respect for His authority and law, then the truth in forgiveness, we see this in the timeline of His word ... Abraham, the law through Moses, then Christ being sent. Faith is given, the law is given and then Christ is given, if any one of these is missing we do not have the items inside the ark of the covenant inside of us.
If men do not even have respect for the lawmakers and the laws of men, there is no way we can even expect them to have respect for the Father's authority and His laws. Thus, why the religious system stays intact, they teach men to have respect for God's authority and respect for His law but there are a lot out there that abuse this authority.
I hope this was clear enough for anyone to understand and out of respect for you DrBubbaLove, I now see that you are not of those that abuse the authority you have been given.
Thanks for that.
Agreed, but will add that I think it is true with His help (we call it an application of His Grace on us), we can better maintain our respect for His authority - but it no guarantee and we still frequently succumb to our fallen nature. So from our view, it is a cycle. We fall, our ashamed and repent for what we did, ask for forgiveness and start again. A cycle we believe we can reach the end of this life in the wrong stage (fallen without having repented) and would thus be destined for an eternity in Hell.
The difference, as it goes to this UR in this thread, is that we say our access to His Grace and His forgiveness stops as far as His cleaning us up, that ends when our life here ends - and the UR person must be suggesting it goes on for those who did not "get the lesson" in this life so they continue same process in Hell.
I would disagree that we have to respect the Law of Moses in order to be accepted by God. Instead we have to respect the Law of Christ which consists only of love and the 10 commandments.
The law of Moses isn't our guide anymore as Paul made clear that Jesus completed it (like a prophecy). In our time now we are free to decide for ourselves again what is right and what is wrong. By this we know that eating bacon is not evil, or that not keeping the Sabbath is not evil. And in the same token we know that stoning someone is evil. We can take the 10 commandments because they contain good commandments for us and do not take most of the rest of the law.
We employ what theologians of the past have called the Law of Nature. It's about living our humanity to its best. We do this by following Christ's law of love for God and man. This is to always transcend our nature for the better.
Following the mosaic code, what the bible usually calls God's law, is now forbidden to us because we trust in Grace not in a righteousness by the law.
How did you mean your words if you think I twisted your words? St. Paul is clear that the Law has been completed in Christ and has nothing to do with our salvation anymore.
Most would say pride comes before a fall. Good luck with these boastful thoughts and your boastful lack of shame at knocking what you obviously have not made an effort to even read.
The point about Hilter was to totally refute your prior attempted to grossly assume about me, the Church and most Christians in regards to what you mistakenly think most Christians believe about who will be in hell. I see you did not get that. Since my short post was obviously not understood and if one has actually read any CS Lewis or any notable Christian theologian, am not sure why I should trust your opinion of those writers.
Am not sure which part you think you have not read in the Creation stories unless you are assuming Satan did not lie about death and instead God lied about it. But then I guess someone proudly boasting a belief that God creates evil in the face of thousands of years of Christian writers to the contrary, it should not surprise us that the idea of UR requires a smallness about God (that He would lie) like no other belief held by Christians. A reoccurring theme here. God does not create evil and does not lie. Just like He said would happen, the Adam that existed prior to this event died that very day, both spiritually and physically.
But then if someone is going to imagine God lying and creating evil, and Satan telling the truth ("come on you are not really going to die, the big guy just doesn't want you to have that because then you will be like Him" - which he did to spark envy in their minds) I can guess I can see how such a person could read the creation story and claim they had never heard anyone say death came that day in order to see that in the story.
Also kind of obvious (and sad) that a person boasting they do not care what thousands of years of Christian writers have said, that this person has not bothered to read much of those writings to be able to say they had never understood how someone could see that death really did come that very day in the story before they had read that in my post. I cannot take credit for any of this as my original thoughts. Had they actually read what they claim not to care about they would know that.
Only have a few minutes so will address only this first statement at the moment
I thought the 10 commandments were/are the law of Moses? am I wrong? and I also stated that we are to respect the authority of the law (which is the Father) "AND" respect His law, the two cannot be separated ..... and I also did not say that we had to have this respect in order to be accepted by the Father.
I believe your very first statement twisted everything I said into something else.
God "...will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth" (I Timothy 2:4).
That's pretty tough to believe, isn't it. And the original Greek doesn't say God merely "hopes" to save all, it says He is "willing" to save all, meaning God is ready, eager, and prepared to do this! Not at all reluctant! This fact is born out in Isaiah 53:10, for a great many translations tell us that God "was pleased" to sacrifice His son for us all. "All" would include all young children who have ever lived, all the mentally deficient, all the insane who have ever lived, all of the billions of people who, not knowing God, have worshiped false gods, and "all" would even include those who have led extremely wicked lives. So are all of these multiple billions of His creation actually going to learn the truth and be saved as God claims? In most people's minds that's indeed very hard to believe -- even for most professing Christians. But as the evangelist Paul Finkenbinder (aka, Hermano Pablo) stated many years ago:
"Pessimism is sin."
For proof of this he gave the example of how the Israelites who had been sent to spy out the Promised Land, came back with a very gloomy, pessimistic report. You can read of this in Numbers 13:25-33. Basically, their message was that the land promised by God was impossible to take because of its "strong" defenders and "very great" walled cities. What God had promised them, they considered unachievable and absolutely impossible to obtain! To them there was NO WAY that Israel could enter and take the land that God had promised them! But this lack of faith in God's promise had very serious repercussions, even more serious than their constant complaining after leaving Egypt, and even more serious than their idolatrous worshiping of their molten calf! The Bible clearly states that it was this lack of faith, this unbelief -- and the unbelief of those who heard their message -- that resulted in God (in the Person of Christ) not granting to them entrance into this Promised Land (Hebrews 3:18-19; 4:6,11). Today, in much the same negative vein, we hear religious leaders and Bible teachers claim that God is incapable of bringing us all into the Promised Land. And like the reasoning of old, it's usually based upon a faulty premise that we cannot count on God to do it all, so it's up to us. Some even claim that God has no desire to save everyone, or that He is hampered by man's supposed "free will" and needs "our permission" to save us! The result is the same. The pessimism and unbelief that existed among God's people in ancient Israel, is prevalent today throughout the modern churches, churches composed of people who likewise claim the 'Promised Land' -- be it heaven or a New Earth -- will not be attainable for most people! The truth is that if we want God to save us in this life, then we need to trust in Him, have faith in Him, rely upon Him, and most of all -- love and BELIEVE Him. Our salvation (in this life) is dependent upon it.
.......................................
When read more closely in PROPER context verse 6 explains what myoptic Christianity can not see. "gave Himself as a ransom for all, the testimony given at the proper time."1First of all, then, I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made on behalf of all men, 2for kings and all who are in authority, so that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity. 3This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, 4who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. 5For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6who gave Himself as a ransom for all, the testimony given at the proper time.
When read in proper context of what Paul is articulating it is clear to see that it is the DESIRE of G-d that all men should not perish but turn to him in repentance.
No, according scriptureS they were never "chosen, called, drawn, predestined or foreordained to believe". Not in this age anyway.The unbeliever has chosen to reject G-d and as a result their destruction is their own doing
David Bentley Hart, one of my favourite Eastern Orthodox theologians, doesn't think it's heretical.I'm reading a book a book whose purpose is to give "three views of hell", traditional, anihilation, and universal reconciliation. My question is, " do you think universal reconciliation is heresy?
When read in proper context of what Paul is articulating it is clear to see that it is the DESIRE of G-d that all men should not perish but turn to him in repentance.
The will or desire of man can never be more than the will or desire of God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?