and you're still so sure of yourself. Cause and effect are not usually so far afield. The fix must be in, no?
No! It's capitalism! Must be the "system", because any system that doesn't recognize your value .....
Then again, maybe you're wrong.
As an employer, from what little I know of you, I wouldn't let you infect my work sites with your attitudes.
You certainly would not fit in around here anymore than things seem to be fitting there.
But, we're all just a bunch of freedom loving capitalists prospering around here anyway, not really you crowd.
This was intended to be a thread to vent, exaggerate a bit even, really let loose, Friday/ Sat. night stuff.
But if you want to be a kill joy, then since the thread isn't achieving it's original purpose just yet, well, I'll explain a bit.
1. The 'below average' means 'fully satisfactory' but because no one this year achieved unsatisfactory and a few got the grade above and two got the grade above that, it is effectively slightly below average.
2. We work together and know each other rather well, we can therefore work out the reasoning behind the gradings, this year's, last year's and the year before. I was just complaining since it is that kind of thread; not explaining.
3. My morale is not bad, in fact it is pretty good despite being in a particularly nasty situation at work, caught between two departments with conflicting aims, and with more bosses than anyone else has.
4. The difference between myself and a few of the most demoralised is they are simply kicking against the pricks whereas I spend my time getting around them. I just have a particularly large number of problems to get around, but I'm keeping up, just barely with a lot of help from my friends. In turn I do my best to help others with the problems they are facing.
5. The assessment system introduced at work was brought in because it was recognised that the previous one did not work. It is now almost universally accepted that the new one is even worse. I had great hopes for it for the entire year despite what others said and it wasn't until the second year had finished that I saw through the total stupidity of it. I also have to mention that top management have made minimal use of the new assessments themselves - it is a system already waiting to be replaced.
Perhaps you have had the fortune not to meet complex ill defined assessment systems used by large companies with totally ad hoc corporate structures, which nonetheless function but don't suit any but the most imprecise assessment methods.
To paraphrase Demming; the things we can accurately measure about a company frequently are trivially unimportant and the things that really matter are difficult if not impossible to assess accurately.
So post in this thread and let rip !