- Feb 4, 2012
- 3
- 0
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
In the end of this world when all is destroyed in the (Peter's) lake of fire where even the elements melt away and where everything including all evil is destroyed then why would God save all the evil into the new creation?
Surely not as a warning instilling fear scaring all those saved from committing sin and evil in the new creation for we are also told that sin or evil of this life will be remembered no more in the new life.
The new world will have no reason for fear thus fear apparently will exist not. If fear (and no reason for its existence) does not exist in the new life then what would the purpose of bringing all the sin and evil from the old world into the new be?
To bring all the evil and sin from the old world into the new world would by its shear presence pollute the new world. This, to me, would be against the very word and promises of God.
If, however, all the nations that treated Israel kindly are saved into the new world would they then have free will?
Rev 21:1, And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Rev 21:2, And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
Rev 21:22, And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it. [This new "Temple" would appear to be The Godhead.]
Rev 21:24, And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it.
Rev 21:27, And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.
Rev 22:14, Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Rev 22:15, For without (ie outside the gates of the city) are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.
Apparently, there are good that are saved that are allowed into the New Jerusalem and "even better good" that are allowed into "The Temple; also, it appears there are those that are not good that are saved but are refused admittance into the New Jerusalem and The Temple.
On the one hand, it would make sense that if all were saved that
Rev 20:12, And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
[(There would appear to be, at the least, three books; "the books" [plural] and the "book of life")
(However, 20:12 does not say "good and evil" rather it says "small and great")]
But, then, would there not be evil (and, also, by extension, free will to do evil) in the new world as Rev 21:27 & 22:15 would seem to infer?
Any thoughts or comments on this apparent contradiction?
Thanks in advance.
Surely not as a warning instilling fear scaring all those saved from committing sin and evil in the new creation for we are also told that sin or evil of this life will be remembered no more in the new life.
The new world will have no reason for fear thus fear apparently will exist not. If fear (and no reason for its existence) does not exist in the new life then what would the purpose of bringing all the sin and evil from the old world into the new be?
To bring all the evil and sin from the old world into the new world would by its shear presence pollute the new world. This, to me, would be against the very word and promises of God.
If, however, all the nations that treated Israel kindly are saved into the new world would they then have free will?
Rev 21:1, And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Rev 21:2, And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
Rev 21:22, And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it. [This new "Temple" would appear to be The Godhead.]
Rev 21:24, And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it.
Rev 21:27, And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.
Rev 22:14, Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Rev 22:15, For without (ie outside the gates of the city) are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.
Apparently, there are good that are saved that are allowed into the New Jerusalem and "even better good" that are allowed into "The Temple; also, it appears there are those that are not good that are saved but are refused admittance into the New Jerusalem and The Temple.
On the one hand, it would make sense that if all were saved that
- those that did not accept Jesus and were bad were not allowed into the New Jerusalem; and that
- those that were either not bad and did not accept Jesus (or, possibly, too, were bad but did accept Jesus) were allowed into the New Jerusalem and, finally, that
- those that were judged good and, also, accepted Jesus are those that are allowed into The Temple.
Rev 20:12, And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
[(There would appear to be, at the least, three books; "the books" [plural] and the "book of life")
(However, 20:12 does not say "good and evil" rather it says "small and great")]
But, then, would there not be evil (and, also, by extension, free will to do evil) in the new world as Rev 21:27 & 22:15 would seem to infer?
Any thoughts or comments on this apparent contradiction?
Thanks in advance.