ufo sighting

[Armoured]

Yeah, I could care less at this point about verification.
I had a flip phone, but I don't know how to post photos from it.
I surf on a kindle, I won't pay $30 a month for internet on a phone.

OK. Now explain the other billion smart phone users?

 

[Rick Otto]

At a high enough altitude, the vapour simply becomes cirrus cloud.

Ever seen a crop duster work?

I live in a rural area, so I'm familiar with them.
Chemtrails have been analyzed.

 

[Rick Otto]

OK. Now explain the other billion smart phone users?

Explain what? Why their photos aren't considered as serious evidence?

 

[Armoured]

I live in a rural area, so I'm familiar with them.

note how low they have to fly and the quantity they have to use to be effective.

Chemtrails have been analyzed.

By whom? How would you even gather a sample of an alleged "chemtrail"?

 

[Armoured]

Explain what? Why their photos aren't considered as serious evidence?

why no unambiguous photo has been taken? Why unambiguous photos aren't being taken regularly?

 

[Rick Otto]

note how low they have to fly and the quantity they have to use to be effective. By whom? How would you even gather a sample of an alleged "chemtrail"?

Lots of respectable investigators have tracked and sampled them. It is easy to find on the internet.
The government has ruled that the term chemtrail is only used by conspiracy terrorists, and what they call them is "persistent vapor trails", so lurk, but don't touch. Let us know what you find out.

 

[Rick Otto]

why no unambiguous photo has been taken? Why unambiguous photos aren't being taken regularly?

Ambiguous is what the object of interest is, hence all photos of of an unidentified object, will be ambiguous, no?

 

[Armoured]

Lots of respectable investigators have tracked and sampled them. It is easy to find on the internet.
The government has ruled that the term chemtrail is only used by conspiracy terrorists, and what they call them is "persistent vapor trails", so lurk, but don't touch. Let us know what you find out.

You made the claim, it's up to you to provide the citation, not me. Otherwise we're just playing "I have a dragon in my garage."

 

[Armoured]

Ambiguous is what the object of interest is, hence all photos of of an unidentified object, will be ambiguous, no?

Don't play semantics. Unambiguous in the sense that the photo is credible and of an unexplainable object.

 

[Winepress777]

It was a weather balloon

 

[Rick Otto]

Don't play semantics. Unambiguous in the sense that the photo is credible and of an unexplainable object.

Don't accuse me of exactly what you are doing.
Photo credibility is a topic for another thread.
I am obviously not interested in establishing credibility.
You either believe this stuff or you don't. I care not which, except to say we shouldn't annoy each other.

 

[Rick Otto]

It was a weather balloon

It probably was.

 

[Rick Otto]

You made the claim, it's up to you to provide the citation, not me. Otherwise we're just playing "I have a dragon in my garage."

No, thanks. I'd much rather play "There's a dragon in my garage" than the game you're inviting.
I am not obligated to substantiate my claim to a lazy, cynical, heckler... but thanks anyway.

 

[Armoured]

No, thanks. I'd much rather play "There's a dragon in my garage" than the game you're inviting.
I am not obligated to substantiate my claim to a lazy, cynical, heckler... but thanks anyway.

Then don't complain when I don't take your claims seriously.

 

[Armoured]

Don't accuse me of exactly what you are doing.
Photo credibility is a topic for another thread.
I am obviously not interested in establishing credibility.
You either believe this stuff or you don't. I care not which, except to say we shouldn't annoy each other.

I'm not trying to annoy anyone. But what's the point of discussing stuff if it's not to exchange ideas?

 

[Rick Otto]

I'm not trying to annoy anyone. But what's the point of discussing stuff if it's not to exchange ideas?

Then let's get right to the point. What exactly is the idea you wish to exchange?

 

[Armoured]

Then let's get right to the point. What exactly is the idea you wish to exchange?

Well, if you have any actual evidence of UFOs, I'd love to see it. Unambiguous photos, for instance?

 

[Rick Otto]

Then don't complain when I don't take your claims seriously.

. Pay attention. It is you who has complained to me. You have addressed none of my complaints because you don't even believe they are real. And now you want me to believe you are not intentionally annoying.
Too late.

 

[Rick Otto]

Well, if you have any actual evidence of UFOs, I'd love to see it. Unambiguous photos, for instance?

I don't believe you believe any unambiguous photos exist, and I have repeatedly told you I give a flip if you believe me or not. Why don't you just respect that fact and stop embarrassing yourself by asking for proof?

 

[Armoured]

I don't believe you believe any unambiguous photos exist, and I have repeatedly told you I give a flip if you believe me or not. Why don't you just respect that fact and stop embarrassing yourself by asking for proof?

I don't believe they exist because I've never seen them. If they do exist, and you know of them, I'm asking you to correct me. Is that unreasonable?