• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

U.S. Govt. & Bush admin. complicit in events of 9/11

A

AmariJah

Guest
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/03/314222.shtml
9-11 Cover Story in San Francsco Bay Guardian
author: Carol Brouillet and Steve T. Jones

After years of effort, 9-11 has finally made the cover story of the third largest San Francisco paper. While the article blasts the key organizers, it also builds a case and argues some of the points that activists have been struggling to make for years.

After a series of successful premieres of Barrie Zwicker's documentary "The 9-11 News Special You Never Saw- The Great Conspiracy" (See the report from the organizer's point of view at http://www.communitycurrency.org/Reportpremieres.html ), here is the 9-11 Cover Story of the San Francisco Bay Guardian that came out March 23, 2005. Quotes:

"The most disturbing thing about the 9/11 truth movement, something you learn when you
really dissect their most compelling evidence, is that the activists are raising critically
important questions about the Bush administration's lies, cover-ups, and geopolitical strategy
- questions that are being almost entirely ignored by the mainstream media."

[We are supposed to believe]... "that one of the most secretive and manipulative administrations
in U.S. history is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth about an event
it has aggressively exploited to implement long-standing and far-reaching political plans,
from the USA PATRIOT Act to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq."

"To blindly believe the U.S. government at times like these is to ignore history and dismiss
warnings from people in positions to know how power is really wielded in this country."

http://www.sfbg.com/39/25/cover_conspiracy.html

We're all paranoid
Sure, the people with the 9/11 conspiracy theories are a little odd. But not everything they're saying is entirely crazy.



From the above we can determine that even some who perhaps disagree with the 9/11 Truth movement nevertheless are willing to acknowledge compelling evidence!
PLEASE DON'T BOTHER REPLYING TO THIS THREAD IF YOU ARE UNWILLING TO EXAMINE THE DETAILED AND CREDIBLE EVIDENCE! There are photos and video evidence as well as mountains of both hard and circumstantial evidence which would cause even the most naive and dedicated Bush supporter to demand direct and complete answers concerning the cruel and untimely deaths of 3000 + people on Sept. 11th, 2001.
http://www.911truth.org/

The top 15 reasons to doubt the official story of Sept. 11, 2001

Disclaimer
Background Issues: The Abiding Truth Deficit

1) The 9/11 Commission Fraud: Conflicts, Collapse and Cover-up

2) The Hundreds of Still Unanswered Questions, the Scores of Documented Lies
Motive Issues: Cui Bono - Who Profits Most?

3) Instant Fulfillment of Neocon Wish List

4) Political Bonanza for Bush/Rove team

5) Scale and Diversity of Profiteering
Means and Opportunity Issues: How to Make it Happen

6) Ignored Foreign Warnings

7) Quashed Domestic Investigations

8) Incapacitated Oversight

9) Disabled Air Defenses

10) The Amazing Disappearing National Chain of Command

11) The Pakistan Intelligence Chief Who Loved Everyone At Once
Aftermath Issues: How to Keep the Lid On

12) The Bitter Fight Against Investigations

13) The Amazing Disappearing Evidence

14) The Amazing Disappearing Demand for Accountability
Wildcard Issues: Just How Stupid They Think We Are

15) The Ripley Believe It or Not Sideshow of 9/11 Miracles

Epilogue: For the 9/11 Legacy Victims Still Dying in New York

Visit the web page listed above and follow the links- each of these 15 reasons are elaborated upon. If you are level headed and fair these are not some looney conspiracy theories- these 15 reasons represent solid intelligent questions about very specific aspects of the 9/11 attacks which deserve direct honest answers from our government and those who support the "official" conspiracy theory... Uh I mean the official story!

Please respond to one or more of these very specific topics documented here if you want to discuss and debate these issues rather than attempting to mock the authors or discredit the sources! Thanks!


http://reopen911.org/
You are invited to examine (THE EVIDENCE) on the right side of the opening page second heading down! Here is the "hard evidence".



9/11 LIST OF HARD EVIDENCE






Based on current research, this is a succinct list of the "hardest evidence" available about the 9/11/01 attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon; this information directly contradicts the American government’s version of events.

--The hole in the Pentagon was too small to have been made by a 757 passenger plane, as photos show. The impression made was approximately half the size of the airplane.

--Larry Silverstein, the World Trade Center’s leaseholder, is on tape saying "…Pull it," in regard to WTC building 7. This building fell suddenly though it was not hit by a plane.

--The Bush Administration misled Americans about the health affects of the WTC attacks, stating "the air is safe to breathe," in order to reopen Wall Street and surrounding areas.

--According to eye witness testimony by several reporters and other citizens, "explosions" occurred at the WTC on 9/11. News footage is available..

--WTC damage was inconsistent with fire (Fire Engineering Magazine); yet consistent with the use of explosives.

--Bush blocked investigations into 9/11, then refused to testify under oath before the '9/11 Commission.' The Bush Administration benefited directly from the attacks in 'political capital.'

--Critical evidence from the 9/11 attacks was destroyed; the government has only released 25% of the documents requested by the 9/11 Commission, these documents have large blacked-out areas.

--The 9/11 attacks were used as a pretext for the war in Iraq; this war, based on ‘bad intelligence’ has resulted in the loss of more than 100,000 lives.

--Five different air military training exercises were taking place on 9/11/01. Was this done purposely to confuse American air defense?

--At least four of the '9/11 suicide hijackers' have turned up alive. The identities of several more are in question. The FBI director admitted not all of the hijackers are known, (New York Times, Washington Post, BBC news).

--Assia Mortensen May, 6, 2005


www.newtopiamagazine.net/archives/content/issue17/oped/911.php
Here are a couple of other serious questions which may not have been fully addressed in the above links and articles.

Researchers, like Zwicker and others, quickly learned that in 2001 before the 9-11 attacks 62 aircraft had been intercepted by Air Force fighter interceptor jets, and usually within 10 to 15 minutes of going off course. http://septembereleventh.org/airdefense.php
Yet bizarrely, on 9-11 four commercial jets were hijacked off course for about one and a half hours before the last one crashed into the most highly protected building in the world (the Pentagon). . . yet no interceptor jet intercepted it in all that time. Alarm bells went off with citizens across the U.S. and the world. A number of people including former NYPD detective, Frank Serpico (played by Al Pacino in the movie about his life as an NYPD whistleblower exposing corruption at the New York Police Department), began to express a suspicion of the "official 9-11 story" during a whistleblower awards ceremony nationally televised on C-SPAN.

Then other issues came to light regarding 9-11, and foreknowledge of the attacks. For example, a former Los Angeles Police Detective named Michael Ruppert noted that outrageously high volumes of insider trading on United and American Airlines stocks prior to 9-11, (reported on by CBS, Bloomberg and other financial papers) actually had some strange ties to the Central Intelligence Agency. 9/11-related insider trading was worldwide. It occurred on markets in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Chicago, New York, London and Berlin. Estimates of the total amount of insider trades have ranged from the hundred of millions (CBS), to the billions (Ernst Weltke – Chief of the Bundesbank), to the tens of billions (Andreas von Bülow, former German cabinet minister).
http://www.newtopiamagazine.net/archives/content/issue17/oped/911.php
Follow the link and read the entire story!

And here are some other links which may be repetative of some of the above questions, but which sum up what some consider to be the most important of the unanswered questions posed to the U.S. Government officials.

http://www.unansweredquestions.org/top_11.html

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4582.htm

http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/WarOnTerror/Persist.asp

Finally here is another link which provides a myriad of links to various research and Citizen watch groups investigating the descrepancies concerning Sept. 11, 2001 and the events pretaining thereto!

http://nancho.net/911CW/MUinfo1.html

Once again~ please take at least a few minutes examining the evidence and answering some of the questions posed by the 9/11 Truth researchers before responding to this thread! Thanks again for your cooperation and common courtesy in advance! :wave:
 

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟38,182.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I wasn't the only one who noticed? I am pleasantly surprised.

Look again at W as he gets the news about the World Trade Center. There is a portrait of a man who realizes he has sold his soul: draft dodger, deserter, chickenhawk, corporate criminal, sock puppet, fraud, murderer, traitor.

:amen:
 
Upvote 0
A

AmariJah

Guest
rebel_conservative said:
lol... :doh:

my mother told that when you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all... so...

Sooo... let me get this straight- are you laughing at the mountains of unanswered evidence, which in any other similar circumstance would be seriously questioned and scrutinized? Or are you laughing at the 3000 killed on 9/11 and the untold thousands killed as a result of 9/11 in Afghanistan and Iraq- because the Bush Administration (as well as other Administrations...) had foreknowledge and were complicit in the events of 9/11, and at the very least they allowed 9/11 to happen to further their agenda while at the same time claiming "issues of National security" as an excuse to omit, edit and spin the facts of that awful and fateful day?
Or perhaps you are just laughing at the incredible stupidity and gullibility of the people who "lay down" and accept the perposterous "conspiracy theory" presented as the official government story explaining 9/11?
 
Upvote 0
A

AmariJah

Guest
The various Citizens inquiries into the real facts and circumstances leading up to and culminating with the attacks on the WTC is the defining event in American history! If "We The People" allow the Federal Govt. to deceive and manipulate us without calling their bluff- and without holding them accountable for their horrific war crimes, it will ultimately change the entire face of this country and indeed the world. And on a more personal note- if "We The People" fail to cry foul and hold the Bush administration accountable then we fully deserve to lose all of the freedom and liberty that this country has enjoyed up till now!
THIS IS IMPERITIVE TO THE FUTURE OF OUR NATION!
 
Upvote 0
A

AmariJah

Guest
rebel_conservative said:
I just find it to be another conspiracy theory, somewhere up with JFK and the faked moon landing. hey... maybe W. was deepthroat...? or maybe David Icke is right, and Bush is really a 12ft alien lizard...?
So you are saying that you prefer Bush & Co.'s "conspiracy theory" to the scenario that is being uncovered by the thousands of hours of independant citizen researchers? Either way we are clearly working with an elaborate conspiracy theory. Using that terminology does nothing to discredit the extensive, time, thought and serious research that the 9/11 Truth movement has invested in their ongoing investigations.

While I agree with you concerning faked moon landings and 12ft aliens- I have to wonder if you have even examined any of the compelling evidence being presented against the Bush administration at the time concerning 9/11? Or does the subject just not really interest you enough to do some of your own study and comparative research and weighing of the available facts? :scratch:
 
Upvote 0

neverforsaken

Proud American now and always
Jan 18, 2005
2,486
219
42
Hawaii
✟3,691.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I believe this conspiracy theory was examined by skeptic magazine and deflated. but maybe this is a different story. i have a hard time keeping up with all of them. In any case, solidity is determined by the actions of Bush's enemies. If it is so concrete that it could end the bush presidency, then his enemies would no doubt use it like a loaded gun. The fact that they havent fired at him with it convinces me that something is wrong with the story and is nothing more than a blank. People believed that sham of a documentry "F9/11" even though it has been proven that over 95 percent of the movie is either exaggerated or or edited to achieve maximum effect. Pull the trigger my friends and you will have my attention. but if this smoking gun will not be fired by Bush's enemies on the hill who would sell their souls for something solid. i can only assume this smoking gun shoots nothing but blanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaryS
Upvote 0

rebel_conservative

Baruch HaShem! Praise G-d!
Feb 5, 2005
11,135
110
✟34,327.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
neverforsaken said:
In any case, solidity is determined by the actions of Bush's enemies. If it is so concrete that it could end the bush presidency, then his enemies would no doubt use it like a loaded gun. The fact that they havent fired at him with it convinces me that something is wrong with the story and is nothing more than a blank.

exactly, if there was any concrete evidence... or even somewhat-less-than-concrete evidence (cbs memos...?)... against Bush, then the media and the Kerry campaign and the liberal 527's would have made them public... unless they are all in on it too... :confused:
 
Upvote 0

Fa'Head

Active Member
May 22, 2005
172
15
59
✟372.00
Faith
Baptist
Politics
US-Others
If they are guilty, and I'll admit the evidence makes you consider it a possibility, then I would think that nobody in our government would want to prove it true, including Democrats. I believe that it would have a devastating effect on the federal government in it's entirety, destroying all of what little trust we have in them. I think it would bring this country to it's knees and then some with serious civil unrest and I couldn't begin to fathom the international implications. It could conceivably bring us to ruin.

Never-the-less, that chance should be taken with some thorough investigations. I would risk it all, so to speak, to bring people capable of an atrocity like what's being suggested to justice.
 
Upvote 0
A

AmariJah

Guest
neverforsaken said:
well, i say pull the trigger already. if its untrue, it will prove them fools. if it is true then those involved must be brought to justice. i simply dare them to try it.

The illusion of some great division between Democrats and Republicans is quite false! It is merely used to both divide and conquer the American people. In reality America and traditional American values have been all but sold out to something we could call a Corporatocracy. All of the same special interest groups and business lobbies, cater to and of coarse lobby both Democrats and Republicans. It's not that "they" are all working together a much as they are all working for the same international banker "bosses" who continue to pull the strings from behind the scenes. Therefore the actual "enemies" of the Bush administration have more often been individuals rather than groups. And as would be expected the Fed's have played the "threat to National security" card to cover their complicity and crimes.

But, these two posts about bringing those involved to justice seem to lack any real sincereity. I don't really believe that you want the real perpetrators of 9/11 brought to justice if it might possibly be a threat to your comfortable little world view? IMHO
 
Upvote 0

Fa'Head

Active Member
May 22, 2005
172
15
59
✟372.00
Faith
Baptist
Politics
US-Others
AmariJah said:
But, these two posts about bringing those involved to justice seem to lack any real sincereity. I don't really believe that you want the real perpetrators of 9/11 brought to justice if it might possibly be a threat to your comfortable little world view? IMHO

Lack sincerity how? Your reading words from a keyboard, kinda hard to judge my feelings or sincerity based on some basic typed sentences. Should I have used colorful metaphors and very descriptive adjectives with my posts? On forums I prefer to make my point logically without clouding it up with emotions.

I am fairly comfortable in my little world, but I don't really think I would endorse overlooking justice to those behind 9-11 just to stay in my comfort zone. Thousands of Americans murdered, on our soil and maybe by our own government? NOT OKAY WITH ME! Trust me, justice is too nice a word for what I would like to see happen to the real perpetrators.

At any rate, I feel that not too far down the road my comfortable little world view is going to be serverely disrupted anyway, I would prefer it be disrupted for the cause of justice.
 
Upvote 0

stubeeef

Active Member
Feb 6, 2005
97
5
64
North Carolina
Visit site
✟242.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Actually I was thinking that it was a Clinton and Gore plot, sore about the 2000 election. He had 8 yrs to get things in place, especially after missing Usama with a cruise missle. :thumbsup: ;)

Of course it could have been Monica Lewinski, you know what they say about a woman scorned!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaryS
Upvote 0
A

AmariJah

Guest
Fa'Head said:
Lack sincerity how? Your reading words from a keyboard, kinda hard to judge my feelings or sincerity based on some basic typed sentences. Should I have used colorful metaphors and very descriptive adjectives with my posts? On forums I prefer to make my point logically without clouding it up with emotions.

I am fairly comfortable in my little world, but I don't really think I would endorse overlooking justice to those behind 9-11 just to stay in my comfort zone. Thousands of Americans murdered, on our soil and maybe by our own government? NOT OKAY WITH ME! Trust me, justice is too nice a word for what I would like to see happen to the real perpetrators.

At any rate, I feel that not too far down the road my comfortable little world view is going to be serverely disrupted anyway, I would prefer it be disrupted for the cause of justice.

Amen to your sentiments Fa'Head! :amen: My comments were in response not to your post but to posts 10,11,13. Of coarse I cannot judge someones "feelings" on a message board. ;) However I do often sense that many Bush supporters, Republicans and "right wing conservatives" (whatever that really is..?) Do not really want or support a complete independant non-partisan investigation into the events of 9/11. Nor does it seem that many would like to bring those who are responsible to justice, particularly if there is a possibility that many in the Bush administration were involved or at the very least foreknowledge of the attacks yet failed to act. :mad:
 
Upvote 0

HumbleMan

Ragamuffin
Dec 2, 2003
5,258
274
Mississippi by way of Texas
✟32,880.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I don't think that it was a deliberate plot by Rove and Co., but I do think 9/11 was the culmination of theirs and their political forefather's policies. And I think they know it, and have still used it for political and geographic advantages. I think that's why they are so deliberate and focused on keeping everything nice and quiet under the veil of "national security".
 
Upvote 0