Herein lies the problem. some SDA believe nonadventist live in darkness and they're in the light
but yet still........Attacking and name calling is not the way to have peaceful dialog. (primary objective of CF)
We all draw warnings and santions when we engage in a confrontational manner. (Forum's commandments seem quite reasonable )
It's a shame to accuse other churches of loving darkness because they dont embrace the sabbath issues as you do. You should hear their argument before accusing and misrepresenting what others believe.
The default is to run off or get nasty when you cant present truths.
Thats just a fact of our faith and how strongly we believe it to be truth. We don't (or shouldn't) mince words when speaking of our faith. We openly condemn the Papacy as the beast of Revelation, something all protestants did at one time, but it seems such statements are not ecumenical and politically correct today. We are to proclaim the second angels message which is to come out of the Babylonian churches, which are the Roman catholic church and her daughters the protestant churches.
These are the cold hard facts of our message and yes, we need to deliver it with the love of Christ as our example. He didn't mince words either when condemning the apostate system of worship in His day and neither should we. Giving the message with love, is not with a soft shoe approach, but in the desire to not see fellow men perish.
Believe it or not Crib, I try and present the SDA message because I love you and don't want to see you, or anyone else, perish. I know the other SDA members on here feel the same way I do....
I admit, that in my zeal for diseminating the truth, I get frustrated and lash out by the lack of fertile soil my words seem to fall onto but that is my prideful, carnal side and I pray continually to overecome that spirit.
Upvote
0