B
BrotherMatthew
Guest
Hi everyone,
I just have a few passages which have been bothering me. I am genuinely seeking what scripture has to say so any response Id appreciate refraining from simply personal opinion, and simply stating the objective. A bit of background on why Im asking is because these are things that have come up in my class at bible college and having been in line with Reformed thought prior Im not certain how to reconcile some of this with that.
The first passage, is Hebrews 6, second is 2 Peter 2:20
My Understanding: (Hebrews 6:4-6)
This is directed at those who have been enlightened(to salvation, as is the normal usage of enlightened) tasted of the heavenly gift, partakers of the Holy Spirit, and power of God(active believers and not passively sitting in pews,) and tasted the good Word of God. It seems to me in the most clear reading of the test its basically saying in verse 4, it is impossible for those once saved
Then for these people it is impossible if they fall away(parapipto, I understand is only used here and seems to mean to deviate from the right path or to fall away from worship of the one true God) it is impossible to restore them to repentance, because to do so is to crucify Christ again. Repentance being one of the foundations mentioned earlier in Heb 6. Just as the foundation of a building cannot be laid twice nor can the foundation of a Christian be laid twice.
So it seems to clearly state that a believer can lose salvation(as repentance is a stage in salvation[for lack of a better phrase] so without repentance one is not saved, or so it seems to me)
So where is my fallacy? Ive tried to lay out my stream of consciousness clearly on this passage, but dont hesitate to ask.
The second passage in question comes from Second Peter, 2 Peter 2:20
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
Again this passage seems to state that these people have escaped the defilement and then become entangled again(showing that they were untangled for a period)
This seems initially to state the case that they simply had a head knowledge but not a reality of Christ, yet if they were not truly saved I dont think it could be said they were again entangled but rather they remained tangled.
I again seek alternative views on this, and critique of the understanding. I don't know how to reconcile this view with the verses that seem more obviously to support Perseverance Of the Saints without saying something like you persevere while 'you remain' in Jesus, which seems false to say.
Thanks for taking the time to read.[FONT="][/FONT]
I just have a few passages which have been bothering me. I am genuinely seeking what scripture has to say so any response Id appreciate refraining from simply personal opinion, and simply stating the objective. A bit of background on why Im asking is because these are things that have come up in my class at bible college and having been in line with Reformed thought prior Im not certain how to reconcile some of this with that.
The first passage, is Hebrews 6, second is 2 Peter 2:20
My Understanding: (Hebrews 6:4-6)
This is directed at those who have been enlightened(to salvation, as is the normal usage of enlightened) tasted of the heavenly gift, partakers of the Holy Spirit, and power of God(active believers and not passively sitting in pews,) and tasted the good Word of God. It seems to me in the most clear reading of the test its basically saying in verse 4, it is impossible for those once saved
Then for these people it is impossible if they fall away(parapipto, I understand is only used here and seems to mean to deviate from the right path or to fall away from worship of the one true God) it is impossible to restore them to repentance, because to do so is to crucify Christ again. Repentance being one of the foundations mentioned earlier in Heb 6. Just as the foundation of a building cannot be laid twice nor can the foundation of a Christian be laid twice.
So it seems to clearly state that a believer can lose salvation(as repentance is a stage in salvation[for lack of a better phrase] so without repentance one is not saved, or so it seems to me)
So where is my fallacy? Ive tried to lay out my stream of consciousness clearly on this passage, but dont hesitate to ask.
The second passage in question comes from Second Peter, 2 Peter 2:20
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="][/FONT]For if, after they have  escaped the defilement of the world by the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and are overcome, the last state has become worse for them than the first.
Again this passage seems to state that these people have escaped the defilement and then become entangled again(showing that they were untangled for a period)
This seems initially to state the case that they simply had a head knowledge but not a reality of Christ, yet if they were not truly saved I dont think it could be said they were again entangled but rather they remained tangled.
I again seek alternative views on this, and critique of the understanding. I don't know how to reconcile this view with the verses that seem more obviously to support Perseverance Of the Saints without saying something like you persevere while 'you remain' in Jesus, which seems false to say.
Thanks for taking the time to read.[FONT="][/FONT]