Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Forget videos. Do some proper study.Its 1.5 C degrees warming, not 2. I watch Legit Utube docs not the scam/spam/fake news stuff.
And we're back to collage professors being the greedy rich and oil executives being the hard working common man.I'm educated enough to discern between network news, cult news, & cash cow professors. As I said before there is a whole lot of controversey on the graphs & you can't use a computer model to predict climate. People are under the impression that there is an exponential or geometric series involved for every ton of co2 that goes into the air & in fact that is not the case.
And we're back to collage professors being the greedy rich and oil executives being the hard working common man.
I'm educated enough to discern between network news, cult news, & cash cow professors.
... you can't use a computer model to predict climate.
The proper interpretation of the sentence "you can't use a computer model to predict . . . " is "I can't use a computer model to predict . . . and I assume that you cannot do so either".Clearly, you are not.
Of course you can!
Computer modelling is the ONLY real tool to predict future climate.
Prove it. You made an affirmative claim. Here this explains it a bit more thoroughly than I can:No-you can't use computers to predict climate. You use observations. Meteorological formulas are very intricate & lengthy. You can predict weather but you can't predict 20 years into the future what a given climate is going to be alike because you don't know the position of the jet streams that far in advance nor the activity of the tectonic plates. Entering a specific humidity # is not going tell you anything 20 years from now. Earth is still a pretty big place. Additionally it can be stated whether weather data responds to an arithmetic series, a geometric one, a Taylor series, a logarithmic series, or an exponential one.
No-you can't use computers to predict climate. You use observations.
The computer models made decades ago agree quite well with the subsequent observations.
Weather and climate are not the same.No-you can't use computers to predict climate. You use observations. Meteorological formulas are very intricate & lengthy. You can predict weather but you can't predict 20 years into the future what a given climate is going to be alike because you don't know the position of the jet streams that far in advance nor the activity of the tectonic plates. Entering a specific humidity # is not going tell you anything 20 years from now. Earth is still a pretty big place. Additionally it can be stated whether weather data responds to an arithmetic series, a geometric one, a Taylor series, a logarithmic series, or an exponential one.
That's correct as climate models are "time symmetrical".If I remember correctly (and please forgive my incorrect terminology) they were first tested by back forecasting. They took the data of the past and predicted the climate up to that time. That it came out to the climate of that time was an indication that they were on the right track. And as you pointed out time has confirmed that even those early models were fairly accurate.
There is a whole host of articles, particular from the big newspapers that predicted ice age one second
Only a handful of scientists made the ice age prediction. That went against the consensus of the time. Newspapers need to find something different, not people that all agree with each other, to sell issues. Newspapers are one of the worst places to get one's science from. Not very many papers have good science writers.No actually the computer models don't. See Dr. Tim Ball, Tony Heller. There is a whole host of articles, particular from the big newspapers that predicted ice age one second, greenhouse the next, I mean it changed literally every day. The big one was the 2012 polar vortex that blanketed New England with mounds of snow never seen before. So the vortex issue put a damper on the warming title & they changed it to climate change. Another vortex followed in the winter of 2014-15. This past 2019-20, winter has been absent in the northeast.
No actually the computer models don't. ... There is a whole host of articles, particular from the big newspapers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?