Trump Found Guilty on All 34 Counts In Hush-Money Trial

[A_Thinker]

Problem is that a large percentage of the US population disagrees with you.

You watch your news, with your opinion makers presenting the facts that your side likes.
Whilst the other side watches their new, with their opinion makers listening to the facts they like.

People need to engage with the best of the other side, but they just won't.

Is there anybody on the other side that you respect or would listen to, maybe a Dershowitz?

Dershowitz has made his bed with the other Epstein accomplices ...

 

[A_Thinker]

Devil=accuser/slanderer. It's not good to believe bad things said about others without proof, and it's wrong to entertain or spread slander.

Without any proof, this definitive statement you made amounts to accusation of malfeasance, and the slandering of Democrats. What proof do you have that Trump's Constitutional rights have been violated by Democrats? What proof do you have that Trump didn't conspire with Pecker in August of 2015, to catch and kill bad stories about Trump, and to print and spread negative stories about Hillary? What proof do you have that these jurors who heard the facts of the case and found Trump guilty were politically motivated Democrats?

Obviously, proof that Trump's defense didn't have ...

 

[FaithT]

Oh, then why weren't they all charged with that?

It truly baffles me that anyone could defend and support such a despicable human being like Trump.

 

[Brihaha]

All this will come out in appeal.
Trump will continue to run, and people will continue to vote for him.
I really think people want to spur on anger and violence.

One candidate (the convicted felon with 54 remaining charges upcoming in other criminal trials) has always incited anger to exploit voters. He still wants his base to "fight like hell" so he can continue to avoid accountability. Maga is fixin to be shattered ma'am. The leader is no longer fit for society, much less our Oval office. Take a closer look at Donald Trump and see what he has become today. He is not well and I will be surprised if he doesn't have a complete mental breakdown before his next election humiliation. He will need to be institutionalized in the near future. Donald Trump is not living in reality.

 

[Adam56]

I was going to just monitor this thread.....but this begs a response:



As you later clarify that "they" are "Democrats", then you are insulting a group.

It is not that Democrats "don't care about breaking laws" but that they care about the rule of Law. That all are equal under the Law. That Trump gets equal justice under the law - and is held as responsible for it as everyone else would be.

Nope, the trial was clearly biased. I guarantee many Democrats don’t care. They want Trump out of the election, even if it means by an unfair trial.

 

[Adam56]

It truly baffles me that anyone could defend and support such a despicable human being like Trump.

It truly baffles me how “Christians” can defend millions of illegals immigrants.

It reminds me of abortion and school shootings:

Christians: School shootings kill a few dozen a year, but gun rights matter
Democrats: abortions kill millions per year, but “bodily autonomy matters”

 

[DaisyDay]

So, are you admitting that there is a Deep State which has no accountability to the voters of the USA?

In this case, it was Donald's own non-elected appointees who understood the illegality of his demands.

 

[KCfromNC]

It is not the juror's fault. They were doing as they were instructed. It is the Judge and prosecutor that did all the manipulating in that courtroom.

Yeah, shame on them for a fair presentation of the facts surrounding the case. Everyone should have known that allowing reality in wouldn't be fair to Mr. Trump's defense.

 

[KCfromNC]

Can we clearly state the actual felonies that Trumps was convicted on...

First bullet point in the article linked in the OP.

Anyone know what the common source of this talking point is? We've seen it from multiple posts in the thread. Is this really going to be what the far right tries to sell as their defense of Mr. Trump? That no one knows what crime he actually committed?

 

[KCfromNC]

I have to wonder if some folks have any idea what the rule of law is.

It's when we get to use the law to bludgeon groups we don't like while not having the same applied to those we like, right?

 

[KCfromNC]

ah yeah now let us get into all BIDEN has Done

I'm reminded of how hard the House GOP tried to do exactly that and came up empty. Then, like now, the hot air is little but an attempt to distract from the pickle the GOP has gotten themselves into by hitching their fortunes to convicted felon Donal Trump.

 

[ralliann]

First bullet point in the article linked in the OP.

Anyone know what the common source of this talking point is? We've seen it from multiple posts in the thread. Is this really going to be what the far right tries to sell as their defense of Mr. Trump? That no one knows what crime he actually committed?

The "talking points", are what will be points made in appeal..
It is what will be examined in an appellate court.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Anyone know what the common source of this talking point is?

I think they're using repetition in an attempt to train AIs.

 

[ralliann]

I'm reminded of how hard the House GOP tried to do exactly that and came up empty. Then, like now, the hot air is little but an attempt to distract from the pickle the GOP has gotten themselves into by hitching their fortunes to convicted felon Donal Trump.

We will see in the appellate courts (plural). As I do think it will have to go to the federal court to get justice.

 

[childeye 2]

Problem is that a large percentage of the US population disagrees with you.

You watch your news, with your opinion makers presenting the facts that your side likes.
Whilst the other side watches their new, with their opinion makers listening to the facts they like.

People need to engage with the best of the other side, but they just won't.

Is there anybody on the other side that you respect or would listen to, maybe a Dershowitz?

It really doesn't matter how many people disagree with equal protections under the rule of law. To not love others as yourself is hypocrisy and will produce sinful behavior.

 

[essentialsaltes]

ah yeah now let us get into all BIDEN has Done....

Let's.

“What is the crime that you want to impeach Joe Biden for and keep this nonsense going? Why? What is the crime? Tell America right now,” Raskin demanded at one point.

Speaking over Raskin, Comer said, “You’re about to find out very soon,” despite having witnesses repeatedly contradict and debunk Republican claims.

That was seven weeks ago, and there's still no answer.

Now see how the turntables have... wait, I messed that up.

 

[KCfromNC]

The "talking points", are what will be points made in appeal..

The appeal is going to be based on the people filing it being ignorant of the law? That doesn't seem like a winning approach.

 

[KCfromNC]

We will see in the appellate courts (plural). As I do think it will have to go to the federal court to get justice.

I'd think the House GOP investigations would need to result in a court case against Biden before there's even a need to worry about potential appeals.

 

[childeye 2]

Anyone know what the common source of this talking point is?

I saw Trump say it several times.

 

[ralliann]

Let's.



That was seven weeks ago, and there's still no answer.

Now see how the turntables have... wait, I messed that up.

No, waiting to see what comes from appeals.