Trump’s border czar says any illegal immigrant can be deported: ‘We’ll eventually get to you’

[Vambram]

That is another disingenuous article. "Encounters" meaning those encountered at the border including asylum seekers and people just out and out denied entry are considered "encounters". Encounters, which also doesn't count the number deported and people here legally, are not one in the same.

No, 10 million people have not entered the U.S. under Biden

Evangelical pastor Franklin Graham made a trip to Texas and, while there, he waded into the immigration debate. "(Joe Bi

www.politifact.com

And once again, holy moly, someone who claims to follow Jesus lying.

Poltifact.com ain't a neutral website at all. I agree with Franklin Graham who is a servant of my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

 

[Valletta]

That is another disingenuous article. "Encounters" meaning those encountered at the border including asylum seekers and people just out and out denied entry are considered "encounters". Encounters, which also doesn't count the number deported and people here legally, are not one in the same.

No, 10 million people have not entered the U.S. under Biden

Evangelical pastor Franklin Graham made a trip to Texas and, while there, he waded into the immigration debate. "(Joe Bi

www.politifact.com

And once again, holy moly, someone who claims to follow Jesus lying.

That's a link to an old article that you posted, by now there have been over 10 million encounters since Biden took office, and approaching 2 million admitted gotaways. Then there are all of those Joe secretly flew into our country, and those who completely evade detection. A 12 million number under Joe Biden seems reasonable to me. You bring up those who are counted more than once. Most Americans are not aware of the extensive efforts of Republicans to stop trafficking. As an example, S. 3239, the "Prints Act" was introduced over a year ago by Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn. It would have required children to be fingerprinted so when they were turned back at the border the U.S. would know they were being brought back again. It also included criminal penalties for adults involved in child trafficking. The Democrats have held this bill up in committee for over a year. You also should know that the Biden administration quit the Trump administration policy of DNA testing of children and the adult accompanying a child who claimed he or she was a relative. It is the Democrats' fault that we don't know how many times these kids have encounters or adults have encounters because they refuse to track the numbers. And the Biden administration has lost track of hundreds of thousands of kids. So I supposed you can keep calling people liars because no one for sure knows the actual numbers. But the MAGA focus is going to stay on the most immediate actions needed--to rescue those trafficked and to deport the violent criminals and terrorists.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3239/text​

 

[Say it aint so]

So in other words there is no court ruling against it?

There is no court ruling that says that I can't lock my doors to keep out home invaders.

No. Courts did rule against and some courts ruled for it. That's why it was in limbo. Your other statement is a non sequitor.

 

[Say it aint so]

I am not surprised that you don't understand why I am making this argument. You appear to have a progressive left wing liberal point of view that therefore refuses to allow you to understand the constitutional conservative point of view.

You're not making a constitutional argument. You're not making a legal argument. You're point is well, admins enforce laws differently, which is true. Come deportation admins focus on illegals enacting crimes here. So that is a choice of enforcement. What they can't do and do not do is dub those here legally, are now illegal.

 

[Say it aint so]

Poltifact.com ain't a neutral website at all. I agree with Franklin Graham who is a servant of my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

Politfact is sourcing your claim. The claim that you and your other article where the author like you conflate terms is in fact false. Politifact unlike the sources you guys post here like the NYPost and WashTimes, link their sources.

 

[HARK!]

No. Courts did rule against and some courts ruled for it. That's why it was in limbo.

Source?

Your other statement is a non sequitor.

No it's not.

 

[Say it aint so]

That's a link to an old article that you posted, by now there have been over 10 million encounters since Biden took office, and approaching 2 million admitted gotaways. Then there are all of those Joe secretly flew into our country, and those who completely evade detection. A 12 million number under Joe Biden seems reasonable to me. You bring up those who are counted more than once. Most Americans are not aware of the extensive efforts of Republicans to stop trafficking. As an example, S. 3239, the "Prints Act" was introduced over a year ago by Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn. It would have required children to be fingerprinted so when they were turned back at the border the U.S. would know they were being brought back again. It also included criminal penalties for adults involved in child trafficking. The Democrats have held this bill up in committee for over a year. You also should know that the Biden administration quit the Trump administration policy of DNA testing of children and the adult accompanying a child who claimed he or she was a relative. It is the Democrats' fault that we don't know how many times these kids have encounters or adults have encounters because they refuse to track the numbers. And the Biden administration has lost track of hundreds of thousands of kids. So I supposed you can keep calling people liars because no one for sure knows the actual numbers. But the MAGA focus is going to stay on the most immediate actions needed--to rescue those trafficked and to deport the violent criminals and terrorists.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3239/text​

False all over again. The meaning of encounters are not the same as "illegals". Moreover, the practice of flying people to make their asylum claim hearings is not new. It was done under Trump. Your "reasonable" doesn't impress me. I am fact based person.

 

[HARK!]

Politifact unlike the sources you guys post here like the NYPost and WashTimes, link their sources.

Politifact is a biased source.

 

[Say it aint so]

Source?

No it's not.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) promised to immediately challenge the rule in court.[16][17] On July 24, 2019, Judge Timothy Kelly of the DC District Court upheld the new rule, but that same day Judge Jon Tigar of the Northern California District Court issued a preliminary injunction against the rule in Innovation Law Lab v. Wolf, halting its implementation until the legal matters could be resolved.[18] In September 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed an injunction against the rule in Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant,[19] allowing the rule to take effect while legal challenges were pending.[20]​

​

On March 4, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ordered the "Remain in Mexico" program halted in the states under its jurisdiction, on the presumption that it violates statutory law; a lawsuit by various advocacy groups against the Department of Homeland Security is still awaiting final decision.[21] On March 11, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the injunction,[22] allowing the Trump administration to continue the program while litigation continues.[23]​

Batted around the courts like a pinata, and never settled.

 

[Say it aint so]

Politifact is a biased source.

LOL, cognitive dissonance. They source what they say.

 

[HARK!]

LOL, cognitive dissonance. They source what they say.

A half truth is often a misrepresentation of the truth. I've read their deceptive propaganda before.

 

[Valletta]

False all over again. The meaning of encounters are not the same as "illegals". Moreover, the practice of flying people to make their asylum claim hearings is not new. It was done under Trump. Your "reasonable" doesn't impress me. I am fact based person.

Not false all over. I see no one posting who questions that encounters are not the same as illegals. Nor did anyone say that no one was ever flown in under the Trump administration. What I'm saying is that there are gotaways and people flown in that should be added to the total. If you want to believe lower figures that's your right.

 

[Say it aint so]

A half truth is often a misrepresentation of the truth. I've read their deceptive propaganda before.

LOL. They are not, and you don't care about deceptive propaganda. You post the Moonie Paper and the paper who is owned by the outfit who had to pay 787m for purposely lying routinely.

 

[Say it aint so]

Not false all over. I see no one posting who questions that encounters are not the same as illegals. Nor did anyone say that no one was ever flown in under the Trump administration. What I'm saying is that there are gotaways and people flown in that should be added to the total. If you want to believe lower figures that's your right.

I suggest you read your articles before you post them as some kind of proof.

 

[Valletta]

I suggest you read your articles before you post them as some kind of proof.

I post articles for discussion.

 

[HARK!]

They are not,

A half-truth is a deceptive statement that includes some element of truth.

Half-truth - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

and you don't care about deceptive propaganda

That's a lie.

You post the Moonie Paper and the paper who is owned by the outfit who had to pay 787m for purposely lying routinely.

Yet you have failed to discredit any point of the article that I posted.

FAIL!