Trouble defining 'kind"? Don't worry it's not important . . . . . . . . . . kind of

[Edx]

No problem, my friend ---

But like I just told Edx here (in so many words), you can bury your head in the sand if you want to; but don't come crying to me later when I use the term to pwn you or someone else attempting to say the Flood story was a myth because you can't get all those animals aboard the Ark.

How would you pwn someone based on that? Because you made it up therefore its a good argument? Can I claim faeries are real and they are invisible? Your logic sounds like fun!

 

[AV1611VET]

How would you pwn someone based on that? Because you made it up therefore its a good argument? Can I claim faeries are real and they are invisible? Your logic sounds like fun!

Go right ahead --- I'd ask you to show me invisible faeries in the Bible.

 

[corvus_corax]

I can assure you --- no offense taken at all ---

Well, some respect from me then....
Seeing as how most literalists object (in the most fervent of terms) to the word "interpretation"

 

[Naraoia]

Four legged grasshoppers and fowled bats are clearly errors.

Oh no, four-legged grasshoppers aren't! Plucking two legs from a live insect by far isn't the cruelest thing I did to poor hexapods when I was little and quite inconsiderate of the feelings of our chitin-enclosed friends