• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Trans Fat

Lynden1000

Senior Veteran
Nov 6, 2005
2,454
196
54
Orlando, Florida
✟3,628.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I agree that the advertisement of food and education surrounding nutrition in our country is a moral issue. I just meant that french fries and broccoli don't, in and of themselves, have moral characteristics.

.

I'm not convinced that the advertising of junk food is a moral issue. I think we could use words like "sensible" and "prudent" or "reckless" and "irresponsible", but I'm not sure "good" and "bad" really apply.

Sure, if I have two left feet, no coordination, and a pathological fear of heights, it might be reckless and irresponsible of me to respond to an ad for a weekend mountain climbing tour; but I don't think the company is being unethical by advertising something that is potentially dangerous-or even lethal. It's up to *me* to take responsibility for my choices, even if someone else helped influence me.

And I definitely think Uncle Sam needs to bugger off and stay out of it.
 
Upvote 0

trunks2k

Contributor
Jan 26, 2004
11,369
3,521
43
✟285,251.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sure, if I have two left feet, no coordination, and a pathological fear of heights, it might be reckless and irresponsible of me to respond to an ad for a weekend mountain climbing tour; but I don't think the company is being unethical by advertising something that is potentially dangerous-or even lethal. It's up to *me* to take responsibility for my choices, even if someone else helped influence me.

Of course it is ultimately up to you. But companies do have a degree of ethical responsibilty. I think advertising junk food towards children is a good example of this. A company needs to consider who it is targetting, and what effects their advertising will have on said audience. We can take the more extreme example of advertising cigarettes to children. It's one thing to advertise your product, it is another thing to focus your product to children such that it sets a bad pattern of behavior that can mess them up in the long run.

In your example above, it wouldn't be unethical for the business to advertise. But it may be considered unethical if that business was advertising in "Two Left Feet, No Coordination, and a Pathological Fear of Heights Weekly," and tried to disguise the potential dangers.

I'm not implying the government should step in or anything. Just that there is an ethical issue here that the individual companies need to examine.
 
Upvote 0