• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Totus Tuus sum Maria

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lockheed

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2005
515
29
✟816.00
Faith
Calvinist
While the thread is locked, I want to clarify something I said in a previous thread that drew the ire of some posters here. Regarding "Mary" and JPII's devotion to her, I didn't bring it up to simply anger people, but to clearly express what BBAS 64 (and myself) were saying. Now, you can dislike what I wrote but you cannot deny the facts of JPII's beliefs and the implications thereof.

I didn't "bring up Mary" to bash Catholics, but quoted John Paul II in regards to his faith in response to what others were saying against BBAS 64. The language I used was direct quote from Catholic websites.

In his encyclical "Redemptoris Mater" John Paul II wrote:
"And now, standing at the foot of the Cross, Mary is the witness, humanly speaking, of the complete negation of these words. On that wood of the Cross her Son hangs in agony as one condemned. He was despised and rejected by men; a man of sorrows . . . he was despised, and we esteemed him not: as one destroyed (cf. Is. 53:3-5). How great, how heroic then is the obedience of faith shown by Mary in the face of Gods unsearchable judgments! How completely she abandons herself to God without reserve, offering the full assent of the intellect and the will to him whose ways are inscrutable(cf. Rom. 11:33)! And how powerful too is the action of grace in her soul, how all-pervading is the influence of the Holy Spirit and of his light and power! Through this faith Mary is perfectly united with Christ in his self-emptying. For Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men: precisely on Golgotha humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross (cf. Phil. 2:5-8). At the foot of the Cross Mary shares through faith in the shocking mystery of this self-emptying. This is perhaps the deepest kenosisof faith in human history. Through faith the Mother shares in the death of her Son, in his redeeming death; but in contrast with the faith of the disciples who fled, hers was far more enlightened. On Golgotha, Jesus through the Cross definitively confirmed that he was the sign of contradiction foretold by Simeon. At the same time, there were also fulfilled on Golgotha the words which Simeon had addressed to Mary: and a sword will pierce through your own soul also. Yes, truly blessed is she who believed!"
I'll allow the man to speak for himself. Thus, as his motto states: "Totus Tuus sum Maria"... " Mary, I am totally yours".
 

Matthan

Veteran
Aug 21, 2004
1,450
214
Upstate New York
✟2,689.00
Faith
Baptist
I, too, have pointed up the extent of the late pope's Mary worship. He made no secret of his love and devotion to the mother of Jesus. At Denver, at an extremely large youth gathering, he put the entirity of their eternal protection in the hands of Mary, NOT JESUS AND/OR GOD! That was his blessing to them!

If the Mods will not let someone post the exact words of any person (such as was in this particular case) for fear of offending someone, then I would respectfully suggest that the Mods need to take a step back and do some Christian self-reflection. Jesus was not hesitant to offend any person with His truth (check out John 6:61 or any of the verses with Him tossing out the moneychangers or talking to the Pharisees), and that is how we are taught to act for Him, too.

When the truth of any subject in Christianity becomes offensive to anyone, and we are to bow to the wishes of the offended person rather than defend God's Truth, then where does that leave us as a forum of supposed Christ-believers?

Matthan <J><
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinCrier
Upvote 0

ZiSunka

It means 'yellow dog'
Jan 16, 2002
17,006
284
✟46,267.00
Faith
Christian
John Paul is also the one who, after 2000 years of the church saying that Mary is not the woman with the crown of stars in Revelation 12 and that it is error to impose the identity of Mary on this woman who clearly represents Israel, made it doctrine that it IS Mary and that she should be venerated more for her identity as the woman with the crown of stars.

There is no doubt that JP was devoted to Mary. Even his own words and writings comfirm this.
 
Upvote 0

Lockheed

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2005
515
29
✟816.00
Faith
Calvinist
The Pope is the head of the Roman Catholic Church, he, along with their magisterium DEFINE their theology... thus Il Papa and his assumed infallibility is a theological topic, one that can and should, even in this hour, be discussed with civility amongst BAPTIST brothers and sisters.

Given the recent remarks by evangelical leaders to the effect of the Pope's evident welcoming into heaven (specifically on the basis that he was a great guy who did great things, it is imperitive that we as Baptists discuss such things and clarify where we stand and what we believe, even in the light of threat of opposition.

If it were anyone else who died, be it a criminal or a political figure, we'd be talking about it. It seems that since he was the leader of the Catholic Church (and apparently all of Christendom according to many media outlets), he's a valid topic for discussion. Unless we should be silent the next time anyone dies?
 
Upvote 0

ZiSunka

It means 'yellow dog'
Jan 16, 2002
17,006
284
✟46,267.00
Faith
Christian
Stefan Davidovich said:
Perhaps it is just a little disrespectul to talk this way about the pope so shortly after his death.

Let's discuss theology NOT people.

It's disrespectful to discuss that the pope was devoted to Mary? He himself often spoke of it. Why would it be wrong for us to say what he spoke of himself?
 
Upvote 0

SteveR2021

Steve
Mar 6, 2005
436
27
46
Canada
Visit site
✟23,623.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Given the recent remarks by evangelical leaders to the effect of the Pope's evident welcoming into heaven

I'm sure it was a rich welcome! God does not value us by our theology.

Unless we should be silent the next time anyone dies?

I think we should always be careful not to speak against people - we can speak against theology but i think we stand on dangerous ground when we attack people. Also, out of respect for those who mourn we have a duty to remain silent...if we are going to say things that will hurt those who mourn.

Perhaps the thread should shift its focus and talk about the role of Mary in Baptist theology...I would appreciate it if we did not speak against the pope. I do not believe it pleases God.

Your brother in Christ,

Stephen
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,051
1,802
60
New England
✟618,580.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Stefan Davidovich said:
Perhaps it is just a little disrespectul to talk this way about the pope so shortly after his death.

Let's discuss theology NOT people.

Good Day, Stephen

I am not being disrespecful, I disagree with the man's theology and reguard it as contray to the Scripture, or else I would be a member of his denomination.

When the leader of the Mormon denomination passes are we to not talk about the errors of theology held to by the LDS church and taught by the "passed" person?


Peace to u,

Bill
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinCrier
Upvote 0

SumTinWong

Living with BPD
Apr 30, 2004
6,469
744
In a house
Visit site
✟25,386.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
BBAS 64 said:
Good Day, Stephen

I am not being disrespecful, I disagree with the man's theology and reguard it as contray to the Scripture, or else I would be a member of his denomination.
Before I start I am sorry I was disresepctful to you yesterday. I should have said what I said in another way, and I regret saying it in that manner.

When the leader of the Mormon denomination passes are we to not talk about the errors of theology held to by the LDS church and taught by the "passed" person?
Apples and oranges. The LDS is not by any means a Christian organization, and the Catholic church is. To say that they are not is to say that there was a lull or a non-Christian influenence in the world for hundreds of years before our denominations were formed. Are there errors int eh Catholic church. Yes. Roughly 95% of Marian doctrines are in my opinion 100% false. I do not agree with Papal supremecy, praying to saints, yadda, yadda, but to say that they are going to hell is IMHO pathetic.

Once again, JMHO
 
Upvote 0

Metanoia02

Owner of the invisible &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;a mp;
Jun 26, 2003
3,545
290
Visit site
✟27,703.00
Faith
Catholic
Lockheed said:
In his encyclical "Redemptoris Mater" John Paul II wrote:
"And now, standing at the foot of the Cross, Mary is the witness, humanly speaking, of the complete negation of these words. On that wood of the Cross her Son hangs in agony as one condemned. He was despised and rejected by men; a man of sorrows . . . he was despised, and we esteemed him not: as one destroyed (cf. Is. 53:3-5). How great, how heroic then is the obedience of faith shown by Mary in the face of Gods unsearchable judgments! How completely she abandons herself to God without reserve, offering the full assent of the intellect and the will to him whose ways are inscrutable(cf. Rom. 11:33)! And how powerful too is the action of grace in her soul, how all-pervading is the influence of the Holy Spirit and of his light and power! Through this faith Mary is perfectly united with Christ in his self-emptying. For Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men: precisely on Golgotha humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross (cf. Phil. 2:5-8). At the foot of the Cross Mary shares through faith in the shocking mystery of this self-emptying. This is perhaps the deepest kenosisof faith in human history. Through faith the Mother shares in the death of her Son, in his redeeming death; but in contrast with the faith of the disciples who fled, hers was far more enlightened. On Golgotha, Jesus through the Cross definitively confirmed that he was the sign of contradiction foretold by Simeon. At the same time, there were also fulfilled on Golgotha the words which Simeon had addressed to Mary: and a sword will pierce through your own soul also. Yes, truly blessed is she who believed!"


What is so disturbing about this quote?
 
Upvote 0

Matthan

Veteran
Aug 21, 2004
1,450
214
Upstate New York
✟2,689.00
Faith
Baptist
"And now, standing at the foot of the Cross, Mary is the witness, humanly speaking, of the complete negation of these words. On that wood of the Cross her Son hangs in agony as one condemned. He was despised and rejected by men; a man of sorrows . . . he was despised, and we esteemed him not: as one destroyed (cf. Is. 53:3-5). How great, how heroic then is the obedience of faith shown by Mary in the face of Gods unsearchable judgments! How completely she abandons herself to God without reserve, offering the full assent of the intellect and the will to him whose ways are inscrutable(cf. Rom. 11:33)! And how powerful too is the action of grace in her soul, how all-pervading is the influence of the Holy Spirit and of his light and power! Through this faith Mary is perfectly united with Christ in his self-emptying. For Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men: precisely on Golgotha humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross (cf. Phil. 2:5-8). At the foot of the Cross Mary shares through faith in the shocking mystery of this self-emptying. This is perhaps the deepest kenosisof faith in human history. Through faith the Mother shares in the death of her Son, in his redeeming death; but in contrast with the faith of the disciples who fled, hers was far more enlightened. On Golgotha, Jesus through the Cross definitively confirmed that he was the sign of contradiction foretold by Simeon. At the same time, there were also fulfilled on Golgotha the words which Simeon had addressed to Mary: and a sword will pierce through your own soul also. Yes, truly blessed is she who believed!"
Metanoia02 said:
What is so disturbing about this quote?

What is "so disturbing" here. Let's take a look. First, "Mary is the witness".
Why is Mary even mentioned at all? She adds nothing to Christianity, does she? When Jesus told us, "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life."(John 6:47), did He leave out a mention of Mary by accident? When He told us, "Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life."(John 8:12), did He forget to mention Mary? When He told us, "I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die." (John 11:25-26), did He once again fail to give Mary additional credit? And, when He told us, "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6), did He inadvertantly forget to tells us, "and also by my mother Mary?

So, who exactly is Mary? She is the earthly mother of Jesus. That is it, folks! That is all that she is! She is not any kind of savior for Christians. She is not any kind of mediator between God and man. And she certainly is not the "mother of God!"

Certain individuals and denominations claim, to various degrees, that she is all of these things. That is blasphemy to God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit, any way you cut it. Mary has absolutely NO PLACE anywhere in Christianity. Our faith in Jesus as the only begotten Son of God, or "Christianity", is a covenant with God Himself. God gives man two choices in this New Covenant. We can believe in Jesus as His Son, OR NOT! That's it! There are NO OTHER OPTIONS, as far as God is concerned. It's Jesus, or eternal perdition. Take your choice.

So, any time I (personally) read about someone saying that Mary can get things from God that Jesus can not, or that someone should pray to Mary (for any reason), or that Mary is anything special in Christianity, I take great offense as a Bible believing Christian. Such statements are so much spiritual tripe! But, more importantly, statements such as these concerning Mary also serve to lead innocent people, individuals who want to serve Jesus and be part of His blessed Church, away from Him. They create an impassable barrier between themselves and Him. He is the only way, but Mary is the way. He is the only truth, but Mary is the truth. These are lies! They serve only to lead people away from God, and never to Him!

Yes, I am greatly offended by spiritual statements about Mary being anything important to Christianity. She is not. There is NOTHING Mary can do for any person that might in any way change, alter, or mitigate our decision to accept Jesus as the Son of God and thus receive God's grace. And, there is NOTHING any person can do to change, alter or mitigate his or her ultimate fate by calling on Mary. In fact, any person who relies on Mary with regard to their ultimate fate will likely receive their just reward, as it is written in Scripture.

Matthan <J><
 
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
49
Toronto, Ontario
✟25,460.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Matthan said:
And she certainly is not the "mother of God!"

Just an FYI that Catholics would also say that Mary is not the "Mother of God the Father".

The title Mother of God was initially proposed in the Council of Ephesus (431) to combat heresies that challenged the Trinity, to reinforce that Jesus was both fully God and fully man.

So the title Mother of God is about the identity of Jesus and not Mary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigsierra
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
49
Toronto, Ontario
✟25,460.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Matthan said:
Mary has absolutely NO PLACE anywhere in Christianity.

She has a special place in Christianity. She obeyed the words of Gabriel. She gave birth to Jesus. She took part in his first miracle. She raised him as a child. She witnessed his death on the cross.

NASB - Luke 1:28-30

And coming in, he said to her, "Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with you."

But she was very perplexed at this statement, and kept pondering what kind of salutation this was.

The angel said to her, "Do not be afraid, Mary; for you have found favor with God."

NASB - Luke 1:41-42

When Elizabeth heard Mary's greeting, the baby leaped in her womb; and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. And she cried out with a loud voice and said, "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb!

I don't worship or pray to Mary, but she holds a place in Christianity. Maybe a little overemphasized in Catholicism and a little underemphasized by some Baptists.
 
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
49
Toronto, Ontario
✟25,460.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Some Catholic perspectives on Mary.


Catholic Outlook : Common Objections

It is blasphemous to worship Mary. To worship anyone other than God is pure idolatry!

I could not agree more. That’s why Catholics do not worship Mary. Period. To do so would indeed be idolatrous, and no one would be more grieved by such wickedness than Mary herself, whose job is always to point people toward her Son. For the record, the Catholic Church condemns the worship of anything other than God. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, “Idolatry consists in divinizing what is not God. Man commits idolatry whenever he honors and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods or demons (for example, satanism), power, pleasure, race, ancestors, the state, money, etc.”1 Mary is a creature, like us, and she should be honored for her great faith, but she must never be worshipped. Referring to Mary specifically, the Church says, “no creature could ever be counted along with the Incarnate Word and Redeemer.”2
...

Catholic Outlook : Common Objections

It is wrong to pray to Mary and the other dead saints, because the Bible says there is only one mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus.

The phrase “praying to the saints” is probably an unfortunate one, because in contemporary usage the word “pray” has come to refer only to that form of worship by which we praise God and humbly petition Him. Catholics certainly do not pray to the saints in that sense. However, the word “pray” has an older, now archaic meaning. It used to mean simply “ask,” whether the object of the request was God or a person. For example, in the King James translation of Acts 27:34, Paul says to some sailors, “Wherefore I pray you to take some meat.” In other words, “I ask you to eat some meat.” There are literally hundreds of examples of the word “pray” used in this manner in the King James Bible:
...
 
Upvote 0

Epiphanygirl

Don't De-Rock Me
Oct 6, 2004
7,016
977
Behind you :)
✟11,873.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Gold Dragon said:
Just an FYI that Catholics would also say that Mary is not the "Mother of God the Father".

The title Mother of God was initially proposed in the Council of Ephesus (431) to combat heresies that challenged the Trinity, to reinforce that Jesus was both fully God and fully man.

So the title Mother of God is about the identity of Jesus and not Mary.
:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Lockheed

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2005
515
29
✟816.00
Faith
Calvinist
Gold Dragon said:
Just an FYI that Catholics would also say that Mary is not the "Mother of God the Father".

The title Mother of God was initially proposed in the Council of Ephesus (431) to combat heresies that challenged the Trinity, to reinforce that Jesus was both fully God and fully man.

So the title Mother of God is about the identity of Jesus and not Mary.

Right on!
 
Upvote 0

Lockheed

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2005
515
29
✟816.00
Faith
Calvinist
Gold Dragon said:
Catholics certainly do not pray to the saints in that sense. However, the word “pray” has an older, now archaic meaning. It used to mean simply “ask,” whether the object of the request was God or a person. For example, in the King James translation of Acts 27:34, Paul says to some sailors, “Wherefore I pray you to take some meat.” In other words, “I ask you to eat some meat.” There are literally hundreds of examples of the word “pray” used in this manner in the King James Bible


Just a few miles from my home:

photcol_OurLady_detail.jpg


This is the 32' statue of "Our Lady of Peace" at the chapel of the same name in Santa Clara, CA. (The different colored boxes appear to be for graphic effect.)
 
Upvote 0

Metanoia02

Owner of the invisible &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;a mp;
Jun 26, 2003
3,545
290
Visit site
✟27,703.00
Faith
Catholic
Lockheed said:
Gold Dragon said:
Catholics certainly do not pray to the saints in that sense. However, the word “pray” has an older, now archaic meaning. It used to mean simply “ask,” whether the object of the request was God or a person. For example, in the King James translation of Acts 27:34, Paul says to some sailors, “Wherefore I pray you to take some meat.” In other words, “I ask you to eat some meat.” There are literally hundreds of examples of the word “pray” used in this manner in the King James Bible[/QUOTE]

Been there done that...

What are these folks doing:

photcol_OurLady_detail.jpg


This is the 32' statue of "Our Lady of Peace" at the chapel of the same name in Santa Clara, CA.

Why don't you ask them.
 
Upvote 0

Lockheed

Well-Known Member
Mar 2, 2005
515
29
✟816.00
Faith
Calvinist
Metanoia02 said:
Lockheed said:
Why don't you ask them.

I have... I maintain a message board elsewhere, and have had many communications with Roman Catholics on this subject. Here's my findings and some helpful tips for fellow Baptists on considering the doctrine of 'communion of the saints' as presented by the Roman church.

--
Roman Catholics are quick to note that they do not "worship" the saints. They will however state that they pay honor to them. The theological term used to express honour paid to the saints is "dulia", while "latria" means worship given to God alone, and "hyperdulia" the veneration offered to the Blessed Virgin Mary. Yet even this is far from explaining prayers directed to dead saints and the mother of Christ.
Exo 20: 4
"You shall not make for yourself an idol, or any likeness of what is in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the water under the earth. You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me,"
Keep in mind that when the children of Israel made and worshiped the golden calf they called it YHWH, the Lord who brought them out of Egypt. They claimed to be worshiping God, they never claimed to be worshiping an idol.

In fact, no one worships an idol, they use the idol as a gestalt or means to consider the one they are worshiping or contacting. We should be very careful therefore to consider what it is we 'use' when attempting to worship the invisible God.



Yes, I realize that Catholics claim not to be 'worshiping' Mary or the saints, even while saying they honor the saints with dulia and Mary with hyper-dulia they're doing service to them, paying homage to them. So removing the whole question of "worship" out of the equation, the indication from Scripture is that the dead should not be contacted.
Isa 8:19

When they say to you, "Consult the mediums and the spiritists who whisper and mutter," should not a people consult their God? Should they consult the dead on behalf of the living?

Surely one could say "well we don't use mediums or spiritists to pray to saints", but regardless, the point of this verse is to show that the people of God should consult Him.



The usual rebuttal to this is "well, we're all alive in Christ, God is not the God of the dead but the living." And we Protestants and Baptists agree, the saints in heaven are, in a sense, alive, but they are also physically "dead".



The Apostle Paul, in seeking to comfort those believers who recently lost loved ones either to disease or martyrdom says:
1 Thes. 4:13-19

But we do not want you to be uninformed, brethren, about those who are asleep, so that you will not grieve as do the rest who have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus.
For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.
Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord. Therefore comfort one another with these words.

In this passage in 1 Thes. Paul establishes our doctrine of the death of believers and the hope we have. Paul contrasts "those who are alive and remain" with those "dead in Christ" who "have fallen asleep."



Notice what Paul does not say... he does not say "don't mourn for the dead, you can pray to them for their intercession", he says that they will rise again.



We recognize that the dead in Christ are in fact spiritually alive and now in the presence of the Almighty, just as John writes in Revelation:
Rev 6:9-10

When the Lamb broke the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God, and because of the testimony which they had maintained; and they cried out with a loud voice, saying, "How long, O Lord, holy and true, will You refrain from judging and avenging our blood on those who dwell on the earth?"

Yet maintaining that the believing dead are in fact spiritually alive and with Christ now in no way negates the fact that they are also physically dead. Paul calls them 'asleep' and by this he means in relation to us (not that their soul sleeps). Just as a wife or husband who has fallen asleep, one cannot very well ask them to intercede on your behalf unless they are first awakened.





Therefore the believers who die are, in fact, physically dead, thus the passage of Isa 8:19 must apply. Likewise Ecc 9:5-6...
Ecc 9:5-6

For the living know they will die; but the dead do not know anything, nor have they any longer a reward, for their memory is forgotten. Indeed their love, their hate and their zeal have already perished, and they will no longer have a share in all that is done under the sun.

The dead are cut-off from us, they have no understanding nor do they share in what goes on here.



The final Roman Catholic response is to point out that Christ spoke with Elijah and Moses on the mount of transfiguration. We might also do well to note that Saul had the spirit of Samuel brought up to consult, thus there are occasions in which God allows those on Earth to glimpse and communicate with the dead, yet it is not normative. In fact of these two occasions we can only be sure of the Christ's encounter as what happened with the witch at En-dor remains questionable and is clearly not something the Roman Catholic would want tied to their belief.

So, Christ appeared and spoke with Elijah and Moses on the mount of transfiguration... so what? How does this, in any way, establish the idea that the dead can hear prayers and intercede on behalf of the living? One must note that in the passage Elijah represents the prophets and Moses represents the Law, thus fulfilling prophecy and God's plan. Jesus, God incarnate, was not establishing a doctrine of ongoing communication of believers with the dead by standing with Moses and Eljiah.

Finally, keep in mind that the ongoing 'communion' between the dead saints is an official doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church, it is not a particular schism of individuals. Therefore, while seeking to promote the truth of Scripture, do not mistake the Church's official teachings with specific stubborness on the part of individuals. Always seek to express these truths in a respectful manner.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.