People, in general, seem to have irrational/inconsistent perceptions of various risks when compared to how they assess other risks. Sometimes they're politically/ideologically motivated (like the example you mentioned, or people who have fears about the risks of certain people using certain bathrooms)
Other times, it's just a random phenomenon of the human psyche or a manifestation of some deep-seated fears they may have.
For most people (myself included), I'm sure we can all think of risks associated with a particular activity that we're disproportionately concerned about (and that we take more seriously) than the risks of something that we do regularly that are far more likely, but that we do without even giving it a 2nd thought.
For instance, 12,000 people die every year from falling down stairs, only 3,000 people a year die from food related illnesses... yet, personally speaking, I tend to be more concerned about the latter than the former in how I conduct my risk assessments.
Operating a motor vehicle comes with a higher risk probability than a lot of things we do in our daily life, yet, I would imagine there are a lot of people who happily drive a car without thinking twice about it, but are more concerned about the risks of things that are far less likely to injure or kill them.
Another obvious one, being people who are really concerned about the prospect of flying. (odds of dying in a plane crash are 1 in 11 million), but the weekly drive to the grocery store or walking down the sidewalk next to a busy street doesn't phase them at all even though those have much higher probability...and it's doubtful that them being made aware of those stats would change their perception.