Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
That was the whole reason Powell recommended it. It was never hacked, which is proof enough."since it was more secure than the government-provided server"
no it wasn't. You have absolutely zero proof or technical expertise to even make that statement.
Just FYI in case you're unfamiliar with Aryeh Jay's schtick - just imagine a huge /S after just about everything he posts, lol
Biden's not in office anymore. Obama is not in office anymore. They won big but Trump has never received 50% of the vote, so he can't be who you're talking about.Not when the ruler holds a clear mandate from an overwhelming majority of Americans.
My sincerest apologies, good Sir. It was certainly not my intent to besmirch your good name or reputation. Please accept my most humble apology and know that I will work to help members further understand your majestic sensibilities within these forums forthwith.Good Sir,
It has come to my attention that you are attempting to slander my Good name. Please cease this assult on my Good reputation or I shall be forced to bring it to the attention of my solicitor and the high court.
Good day.
Aryeh Jay Esq.
My sincerest apologies, good Sir. It was certainly not my intent to besmirch your good name or reputation. Please accept my most humble apology and know that I will work to help members further understand your majestic sensibilities within these forums forthwith.
Forever humbled
Ibanezerscrooge, ABC. de. F. GhI. JkL. MNOP...
Journalist has the biggest National Security faux-pas story fall into his lap, (was he unethical in how he obtained it!?).well he may not have to report to anyone at the Atlantic
but the issue here is: was it ethical or even legal for him to stay in a Signal chat room to which he was "accidentally" invited (if that is indeed what happened) and then to screen cap sensitive, or even classified, information, and store it on an unmonitored, unregulated device--for a month?
he basically went full-cowboy on this to get a scoop --which he did.
and made a national security problem a much bigger problem, or potentially a disaster, had his phone been compromised, left in an airport, or the screen caps viewed by a malicious party
and these are just some of the issues regarding this whole thing. Now people are speculating that this goes much deeper:
View attachment 362797
I work in IT securityThat was the whole reason Powell recommended it. It was never hacked, which is proof enough.
The Signal chat was hacked right and left, because their phones were copied when they traveled to foreign countries. They should have used burners, but no.
The government is not a company.I work in IT security
email, by its every nature, it not "secure", especially MS Exchange servers you stick in your basement, that are not centrally managed, properly patched, monitored, or expertly maintained. No company is going too let you put your own home-brew server in your basement because you don't feel like using the established servers
If it had been, we'd know it by now.we don't know if her server was "hacked" or compromised
That's the whole reason Powell recommended it. But I said that already."her server was more secure"! is an absurd statement not backed up by any facts or evidence
He had been assured by several credentialed people testifying under oath that nothing in the chat was classified, top intelligence people who really should know as they were in said chat. As for staying, he is a journalist; he was invited by a principal; he didn't think it was real at first.well he may not have to report to anyone at the Atlantic
but the issue here is: was it ethical or even legal for him to stay in a Signal chat room to which he was "accidentally" invited (if that is indeed what happened) and then to screen cap sensitive, or even classified, information, and store it on an unmonitored, unregulated device--for a month?
he basically went full-cowboy on this to get a scoop --which he did.
and made a national security problem a much bigger problem, or potentially a disaster, had his phone been compromised, left in an airport, or the screen caps viewed by a malicious party
and these are just some of the issues regarding this whole thing. Now people are speculating that this goes much deeper:
View attachment 362797
General Powell's reputation as a good and loyal Republican has changed since then.The government is not a company.
If it had been, we'd know it by now.
That's the whole reason Powell recommended it. But I said that already.
Whoop.I work in IT security
So what makes you think that her server was not properly patched, monitored and maintained? IT was not her grandkids fiddling around in the basement.email, by its every nature, it not "secure", especially MS Exchange servers you stick in your basement, that are not centrally managed, properly patched, monitored, or expertly maintained. No company is going too let you put your own home-brew server in your basement because you don't feel like using the established servers
The probability that Clinton's server was hacked seems increasingly unlikely the more years that go by with nary a single hacked email surfacing, while we know that the State Department's was hacked because they announced it.we don't know if her server was "hacked" or compromised
"her server was more secure"! is an absurd statement not backed up by any facts or evidence
“Let’s share this timely, vital and highly sensitive information with the Americans!”—No other nations, anymore.
I'll take your word on his alma mater, but it doesn't preclude him being a dope.I don't buy it
Alex Wong is a Harvard grad and not some dope.
And yet they were using a commercial app (likely on personal phones) for sensitive discussions.Waltz and all the others are trained and briefed in national security and have to follow protocols (although some may have been broken here)
We shouldn't stop looking. What else are they discussing on unsecure devices/apps?the whole "well everyone is just stupid, nothing to see here, let's move on" position amounts to putting your head in the sand.
I know someone who graduated from a somewhat famous business school and they are a dope.I'll take your word on his alma mater, but it doesn't preclude him being a dope.