Today Project Veritas released Part 1 of the CNN Whistleblower videos

[Kentonio]

I find it somewhat ridiculous the claim that Fox leans right, and CNN leans left at least in equal measure. Fox at least allows a lot more on the left a platform to share their views as compared to CNN which very little if anything is allowed to go out as pro Trump.

The President of the United States is currently under impeachment inquiry and new stories are breaking about it all the time. How much of that have you been seeing on FOX?

 

[KCfromNC]

I find it somewhat ridiculous the claim that Fox leans right, and CNN leans left at least in equal measure.

I don't think anyone claimed that - and given how far to the right Fox is with their opinion pieces, I don't think anyone would believe it if someone did.

 

[Bobber]

The President of the United States is currently under impeachment inquiry and new stories are breaking about it all the time. How much of that have you been seeing on FOX?

What are you talking about? You obviously don't watch Fox as they're talking about the aspects of it all the time.

 

[DaisyDay]

I find it somewhat ridiculous the claim that Fox leans right, and CNN leans left at least in equal measure. Fox at least allows a lot more on the left a platform to share their views as compared to CNN which very little if anything is allowed to go out as pro Trump.

Shep Smith has been replaced with John Solomon of all people. No, I've watched some of the two networks' shows, and I don't find your statement credible based on what I've seen.

 

[DaisyDay]

I guess not everyone is on board with the idea that it is vital that the identity of a whistle blower never be revealed or that the whistle blower never be in a position to be questioned about where and from whom they got their information.

Who is calling for this "whistle blower" to be outed? And who has said that whistle blowers should not be questioned to determine the veracity of their statements? It's already been pointed out that the IG did question the WB's information and found it both credible and urgent. Furthermore, the CIA WB is reporting something he and and his colleagues considered illegal and corrupt while this WB is merely saying his boss is biased against someone who is accused of doing illegal and corrupt things in the country's highest, most powerful office. Do you honestly think there is any equivalence?

 

[DaisyDay]

What are you talking about? You obviously don't watch Fox as they're talking about the aspects of it all the time.

Their main point being that the Bidens are the ones who should be investigated and that Donald is being unfairly persecuted.

I missed how they covered Fiona Hill's testimony. What did they have to say about that?

 

[grasping the after wind]

That's quite an assumption to make. Why would anyone assume that?

Who is calling for this "whistle blower" to be outed? And who has said that whistle blowers should not be questioned to determine the veracity of their statements? It's already been pointed out that the IG did question the WB's information and found it both credible and urgent. Furthermore, the CIA WB is reporting something he and and his colleagues considered illegal and corrupt while this WB is merely saying his boss is biased against someone who is accused of doing illegal and corrupt things in the country's highest, most powerful office. Do you honestly think there is any equivalence?

Of course there is no equivalence. The one whistle blower is out in the open and can be judged by anyone as to his reliability and bias etc and has first hand evidence well documented. . The other is being kept hidden to everyone but one IG and the Democrat leadership and has nothing but hearsay to base a complaint on . There certainly is no equivalence there at all.

 

[whatbogsends]

What are you talking about? You obviously don't watch Fox as they're talking about the aspects of it all the time.

The only time they talk about it is to attack Schiff or the whistleblower.

I watch all the networks, and to claim that Fox is anything resembling fair and balanced (or even that it's more even than CNN) is utter nonsense.

 

[DaisyDay]

That's quite an assumption to make. Why would anyone assume that?

What assumption are you referring to?

Of course there is no equivalence. The one whistle blower is out in the open and can be judged by anyone as to his reliability and bias etc and has first hand evidence well documented. .

Who are you talking about - O'Keefe or his source?

The other is being kept hidden to everyone but one IG and the Democrat leadership and has nothing but hearsay to base a complaint on .

First, that's not accurate - part of his/her complaint is based on what colleagues have said and part is from actual knowledge. Second, it's not clear that the identity was withheld from the DNI - can you back that up?

There certainly is no equivalence there at all.

Yes, one is tittle-tattle about bias, no illegality involved, while the other is of national importance and corruption in the most powerful office in the land.

 

[DaisyDay]

The only time they talk about it is to attack Schiff or the whistleblower.

I watch all the networks, and to claim that Fox is anything resembling fair and balanced (or even that it's more even than CNN) is utter nonsense.

That's not true! They also harp constantly on Biden and son.

 

[whatbogsends]

That's not true! They also harp constantly on Biden and son.

You are correct. Omission on my part.

 

[Bobber]

The only time they talk about it is to attack Schiff or the whistleblower.

There's the talking about Schiff yes and about the whistleblower. Those are a big part of the story. But there's talk about the actual transcript as well, and I'm talking about the ACTUAL words not the yarn that Schiff made up. There's much talk about everything on Fox. Sorry but to suggest otherwise is pure hogwash.

 

[Bobber]

Their main point being that the Bidens are the ones who should be investigated and that Donald is being unfairly persecuted.

I missed how they covered Fiona Hill's testimony. What did they have to say about that?

Fiona Hill has high praise for ousted ambassador, Yovanovitch, in impeachment inquiry hearing

 

[Bobber]

That's not true! They also harp constantly on Biden and son.

And why shouldn't it be a major thing they talk about? Isn't that the Dem's that have brought this whole thing up? Upset that Trump had a line in his conversation about investigating the son of Biden? The nation isn't to become educated about every aspect of why they rightly should have been at least investigated in regard to the past of 2016?

 

[whatbogsends]

There's the talking about Schiff yes and about the whistleblower. Those are a big part of the story. But there's talk about the actual transcript as well, and I'm talking about the ACTUAL words not the yarn that Schiff made up. There's much talk about everything on Fox. Sorry but to suggest otherwise is pure hogwash.

I'm sure they stop to briefly whitewash the transcript as well.

Hogwash is the claim that Fox News is fair and balanced.

 

[Bobber]

I'm sure they stop to briefly whitewash the transcript as well.

You're forgetting one thing. If Schiff and gang truly thought the transcript was whitewashed why would he now be backing off of the possibility of even bringing forth that whistle blower to testify? Why would he do that if he thought there was more to it?

 

[cow451]

That's quite an assumption to make. Why would anyone assume that?
Of course there is no equivalence. The one whistle blower is out in the open and can be judged by anyone as to his reliability and bias etc and has first hand evidence well documented. . The other is being kept hidden to everyone but one IG and the Democrat leadership and has nothing but hearsay to base a complaint on . There certainly is no equivalence there at all.

They have laws about the whistleblower and the Democrats are going by the book as is the IG.

 

[cow451]

And why shouldn't it be a major thing they talk about? Isn't that the Dem's that have brought this whole thing up? Upset that Trump had a line in his conversation about investigating the son of Biden? The nation isn't to become educated about every aspect of why they rightly should have been at least investigated in regard to the past of 2016?

When does the DOJ get around to investigating the Biden’s?

 

[(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)]

So what? All that would mean is that CNN leans left. How is that any different from FOX being tougher on Democrats than they are on Republicans?

At least there is some progress being made by saying that CNN is at least left leaning. Won't be long until more people realize it is just a leftist propaganda tool used by the Democrat politicians.

 

[cow451]

At least there is some progress being made by saying that CNN is at least left leaning. Won't be long until more people realize it is just a leftist propaganda tool used by the Democrat politicians.

It’s just a counterbalance to FoxBabeNews. If either of them are your main source ...