• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Time and history of each book in the bible

Status
Not open for further replies.

AngCath

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2005
4,097
144
41
✟20,088.00
Faith
Anglican
In general, a book is "dated" by the language used, historical references contained, and any mention of it in other sources.
For example: the clues for dating Ecclesiastes, which no one can say for sure are as follows.
1. the theology of life after death is relatively undeveloped.
2. the Hebrew is that of the 4th or 3rd century BC
3. the style is a type of Hebrew only used in literature
4. inclusion of Aramaic, a later dialect
5. although "credited" to Solomon, very unlikely because of 1:16 where the author alludes to the line of kings before him.

these lead most scholars to date Ecclesiastes to about 300 BC. Now, as you ask, there may have been an earlier version that may have been passed down and elaborated upon and in the case of Ecclesiastes this seems to be the case in verses 3:17, 7:18, 8:12-13, 11:9b, and 12:9-14.

What it comes down to is that we can only date what we have, and in many cases there is evidence of earlier manuscripts that simply did not survive to the present day.
 
Upvote 0

filosofer

Senior Veteran
Feb 8, 2002
4,752
290
Visit site
✟6,913.00
Faith
Lutheran
AngCath said:
In general, a book is "dated" by the language used, historical references contained, and any mention of it in other sources.
For example: the clues for dating Ecclesiastes, which no one can say for sure are as follows.
1. the theology of life after death is relatively undeveloped.
2. the Hebrew is that of the 4th or 3rd century BC
3. the style is a type of Hebrew only used in literature
4. inclusion of Aramaic, a later dialect
5. although "credited" to Solomon, very unlikely because of 1:16 where the author alludes to the line of kings before him.


And in this case #2-4 are open to debate about whether those are clues to the dating, and especially the late dating that is suggested.

In Christ's love,
filo
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.