Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I accept Luke as a second-hand witness. However, the Scriptural requirement demands at least two or three first hand witnesses.
Finally, we do not have multiple corroborating first-hand witnesses to many of Paul's unique doctrines.
Where's your Scriptural proof that perfection is needed, instead of diligence as I've demonstrated?
Maybe shortly, I am really enjoying what I am reading. Don't want it to shift to focus on Catholic stuff, which it seems nearly every thread does eventually.
I do think this displays a weakness in Protestant understanding of Canon. For Catholics and other Apostolic Churches the authority question is simple. It is what has been determine by the bishops. When Luther and the other revolters rejected the authority of the bishops, then all bets were off. Surprisingly only 7 books authority was reduced and later removed.
And yet the group who 500 years ago had no problem removing books from the Christian Bible of the West, has an issue with others either removing or adding to the canon. I truly find this hilarious. It's like the pot calling the kettle black. (Southern saying)
None of these verses talk about keeping them perfectly. I contend that keeping them diligently is keeping them.Mt. 5:19
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Vines:
Break, Breaker, Breaking, Brake:
"to loosen," especially by way of deliverance, sometimes has the meaning of "breaking, destructively," e.g., of "breaking" commandments, not only infringing them, but loosing the force of them, rendering them not binding, ...
James 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Mt. 5:19
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Vines:
Break, Breaker, Breaking, Brake:
"to loosen," especially by way of deliverance, sometimes has the meaning of "breaking, destructively," e.g., of "breaking" commandments, not only infringing them, but loosing the force of them, rendering them not binding, ...
James 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Again, Paul knew full well the whole meaning of keeping the Law perfectly or failing at an iota and thus the whole.
None of these verses talk about keeping them perfectly. I contend that keeping them diligently is keeping them.
I missed the part where Netzarim denied the saving work of Christ. Perhaps you could quote that?
Or perhaps stop threatening people who call on Jesus with hellfire?
Habbakuk said the righteous shall live by his faithfulness.It really would help to understand what the Sinai covenant says about itself.
Deut 6: ... And the LORD commanded us to do all these statutes, to fear the LORD our God, for our good always, that he might preserve us alive, as it is at this day.
And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before the LORD our God, as he hath commanded us.
That's one choice. Observe the Law perfectly, and it is your righteousness.
The other choice is this.
Phil. 3:9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:
Like Paul, I would rather not have mine own righteousness which is of the law, but would rather be found in Him though the faith of Christ, of God by faith.
As Habbakuk said, the just shall live by faith.
I'd rather tell people to imitate Messiah - not me (unless I'm claiming to be perfect).
Yes, lead by example, not by command as a lordJesus taught the disciples to lead by example. :shrug:
"And Jesus called them to him and said to them, You know that those who are considered rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. But it shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant,and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. (Mark 10)
It's pretty obvious that if Paul wasn't in the scriptures there will be a massive change in the understanding of the gospel and Christian living; so, what do you make of the people who denounce Paul? They claim that there was many errors in the passages he partaken in the bible and to the others that claim that he was a false apostle and what is your take on Paul?
To back-track. Recently I've got into a small discussion or a light-debate with someone about the law and the teachings of Paul. Basically this person has said that we are to follow the Ten Commandments and that there is no "new law" and that the "old law hasn't been done away with" as Paul and the writer of Hebrews stated against. This person has also claimed that Paul had no right to change anything written in Scriptures and then this person has also claimed that Paul was a follower of the original law. These are some notable quotes from the person: "Paul isn't my Deity. He didn't try to be either." "The problem is with translation and traditions of men. They sucked me in, too, for a long time. If you will get online and research the ways language translations and traditions of men are twisting Paul's words, you will, I believe, learn a lot."
He doesn't claim that and doesn't tell them to imitate him, but to follow his faith and do what he does:I'd rather tell people to imitate Messiah - not me (unless I'm claiming to be perfect).
Yes, lead by example, not by command as a lord
He doesn't claim that and doesn't tell them to imitate him, but to follow his faith and do what he does:
Hebrews 13:7
7 Remember those who rule over you, who have spoken the word of God to you, whose faith follow, considering the outcome of their conduct.
Philippians 3
If anyone else thinks he may have confidence in the flesh, I more so: 5 circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; 6 concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.
7 But what things were gain to me, these I have counted loss for Christ. 8 Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ 9 and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith; 10 that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death, 11 if, by any means, I may attain to the resurrection from the dead.
12 Not that I have already attained, or am already perfected; but I press on, that I may lay hold of that for which Christ Jesus has also laid hold of me. 13 Brethren, I do not count myself to have apprehended; but one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forward to those things which are ahead, 14 I press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.
15 Therefore let us, as many as are mature, have this mind; and if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal even this to you. 16 Nevertheless, to the degree that we have already attained, let us walk by the same rule,[b] let us be of the same mind.
17 Brethren, join in following my example, and note those who so walk, as you have us for a pattern. 18 For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: 19 whose end is destruction, whose god is their belly, and whose glory is in their shamewho set their mind on earthly things.
Habbakuk said the righteous shall live by his faithfulness.
YHWH commands diligent (Ex 15:26, Lev 10:16, Deu 4:9, 6:7, 6:17, 11:13, 11:22, 13:14, 17:4, 24:8, 28:1, Jos 22:5, Ezr 7:23, Jer 12:16, 17:24, Zec 6:15, 1Pe 1:10, 2Pe 3:14, Psa 119:4, etc.), not perfect obedience.
Habbakuk said the righteous shall live by his faithfulness.
YHWH commands diligent (Ex 15:26, Lev 10:16, Deu 4:9, 6:7, 6:17, 11:13, 11:22, 13:14, 17:4, 24:8, 28:1, Jos 22:5, Ezr 7:23, Jer 12:16, 17:24, Zec 6:15, 1Pe 1:10, 2Pe 3:14, Psa 119:4, etc.), not perfect obedience.
Habbakuk said the righteous shall live by his faithfulness.
YHWH commands diligent (Ex 15:26, Lev 10:16, Deu 4:9, 6:7, 6:17, 11:13, 11:22, 13:14, 17:4, 24:8, 28:1, Jos 22:5, Ezr 7:23, Jer 12:16, 17:24, Zec 6:15, 1Pe 1:10, 2Pe 3:14, Psa 119:4, etc.), not perfect obedience.
Diligent to observe all the Law and commands and statutes. And when they/you can't, and that happens daily, there's the sacrificial system to "restore" your next attempt.
And the once a year atonement observance, except no one is able to do that since 70ad.
Are you remotely saying that Jesus' example is a command for us? If this is the case you're and every one else isn't in compliance. Furthermore it isn't possible.Yes, lead by example, not by command as a lord
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?