It's pretty obvious that if Paul wasn't in the scriptures there will be a massive change in the understanding of the gospel and Christian living; so, what do you make of the people who denounce Paul? They claim that there was many errors in the passages he partaken in the bible and to the others that claim that he was a false apostle and what is your take on Paul?
To back-track. Recently I've got into a small discussion or a light-debate with someone about the law and the teachings of Paul. Basically this person has said that we are to follow the Ten Commandments and that there is no "new law" and that the "old law hasn't been done away with" as Paul and the writer of Hebrews stated against. This person has also claimed that Paul had no right to change anything written in Scriptures and then this person has also claimed that Paul was a follower of the original law. These are some notable quotes from the person: "Paul isn't my Deity. He didn't try to be either." "The problem is with translation and traditions of men. They sucked me in, too, for a long time. If you will get online and research the ways language translations and traditions of men are twisting Paul's words, you will, I believe, learn a lot."
I haven't been on this Forum long, but I grew up within the Christian community, at the beginning, in the 70s and coming back to 'debates raging' here on CF, it's the same ole' same ole, to my mind:
There are a few who try to sort out what we come across that seems contradictory in the various books, especially if it's what Jesus said vs. what, say, Paul wrote in his epistles. And we're really trying to live Jesus' Good News, and where Paul's example and words, instructions seem to support what Jesus said, we're cool. Then there are times when Paul seems to say something that is at odds with the very core of Jesus's teachings or 'life as example' like Paul exhorting us to obey the law (you probably know the passages about obey the law, you have nothing to fear if you're doing right (gist), vs. Jesus saying, 'Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's," and He told us to 'Love God with all our heart, mind, soul, strength' and 'Our neighbor as ourselves', and also, that He came to 'fulfill' (fill up' the Law, not to do away with it... And further, He had to ask for a coin, having none of his own, to make a point about what Caesar gets...
It goes on and on...
But what I pray (ask, listen to), and what I read, again and again, through Jesus' actions; what angered Him; when He cried, and how He died, rose again, and so on... When I humbly come to God and stuttering, often I stutter, Please help me live, today, what you taught; please help me to obey God, today; please help me be an active member, to 'be' a member of your Body here on Earth, today...
Well, all debate falls away as what Blaise Pascal called 'diversion'.
I mean that the Fruits of the Spirit are not at odds with what Jesus taught; they are evidence of our obedience; the outcome of our Regeneration; what we will be known by...
And so when I pray 'please give me what I need, and You, God, know what that is...' I just don't have any problem trying to study this passage 'vs' that one, or Jesus 'vs' Paul, or the 'will' to get into debates with anyone at all:
I bake from scratch for my husband; I make a CD list to burn gospel songs for my brothers and sisters in Christ'; I make sure the elderly neighbor knows I still have his key (for when he locks himself out again); I feel tired and remind myself, 'go slow, it's OK, no race' when I feel that I may not 'get enough done' (enough by whose standards? If I pray, and I did, and God and I have our wills aligned, as I can tell is so by the peace I feel when I am typing up a recipe, bringing medicine to a neighbor, taking a brief walk before coming back home to continue doing the next thing that needs doing...',
well, I don't fall for the 'debate' trap, you know, 'oh, that Paul, he was always trying to put women down', or 'Jesus didn't expect us to live the Sermon on the Mount NOW, that's for after...'
It doesn't matter, the list is endless, the ways of diversion limited only by individual (and group) imagination.
***
I'm reading Frank Sheed's Theology for Beginners, and I like his 'Will, Intellect, Imagination' and how they interplay in our lives:
We are each limited not only by how much will, intellect and imagination we have but to what end we put them to use, rather than allowing them to push us:
Gentleness
Love
Generosity
Joy
Self-discipline
And on and on, I grow, as I go to Jesus' Good News, to my Heavenly Father with Humility, into the Bible looking not to avoid obeying but what Jesus told me obeying God looked like, and He told us to 'pick up our cross and follow Him' and all over the Gospels, Jesus is DOING and praying and meditating and being tempted and SERVING and OBEYING his Abba:
Why, Jesus, asked, do you call me good? Only my Heavenly Father is good.
***
This day is almost over, and regardless of what translation I go to, the passage in Matthew reads 'enough' the same: The trouble I got into today was sufficient for this day.'
I'm grateful that today, and this is the only day Jesus told me to be concerned with: This day?
I did my best to be doing the sorts of things I would not feel ashamed of if today were the day of Jesus' return. I 'watched', and it's been a full and good kind of tiring day.
Tomorrow?
Jesus told me not to worry about tomorrow, so here is a song whose 'sound' comes from my hillbilly roots, and whose meaning comes right from Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, and Paul echoes it in 1 Corinthians chapter 13, the whole chapter:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om69zHwWO1Y
~ Carolyn