Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Their 'shepherd' (whoever they listen to) : A wolf, a lion roaming the earth to devour souls, through religion, non-religion, ecumenicism, world church , politics, money, greed, entertainment, hollywood, tv, .....
... science.
Really? Their website includes this as part of AiG's definition of the scientific method:
"Is Answers In Genesis Anti-Science?
Not at all! Answers in Genesis (like other creationist groups) affirms and supports the teaching and use of scientific methodology, and we believe this supports the biblical account of origins.
Two Kinds of Science
To understand what science is, it is helpful to distinguish between operational science and origin science and compare how each one seeks to discover truth. Operational science uses observable, repeatable experiments to try to discover truth. Origin science relies on relics from the past and historical records to try to discover truth."
This is an irrelevant point to the investigation of evidence.Every day the carnal continue dying, apart from and without Jesus.
What is relevant ?This is an irrelevant point to the investigation of evidence.
Sheep without a shepherd!
This is not a definition of the Scientific Method.
yep!Feel free to tell me if I've misunderstood the context of:
Scripture
What is relevant ?
yep!
We need to remember this world we comprehend is full of lesser gods, who have pulled the strings and have been given credit for controlling nature.
And why should anyone, let alon[e] scientists, accept AiG's definitions of the scientific methods?Really? Their website includes this as part of AiG's definition of the scientific method:
AiG isn't even just interested in "biblical account of origins", but their particular interpretation of such."Is Answers In Genesis Anti-Science?
Not at all! Answers in Genesis (like other creationist groups) affirms and supports the teaching and use of scientific methodology, and we believe this supports the biblical account of origins.
Two Kinds of Science
To understand what science is, it is helpful to distinguish between operational science and origin science and compare how each one seeks to discover truth. Operational science uses observable, repeatable experiments to try to discover truth. Origin science relies on relics from the past and historical records to try to discover truth."
The only "origin" sciences I can think of are abiogenesis (orgin of life) and the parts of physical cosmology involving the formation of this Universe from other stuff (a pre-existing substrate, eternal inflation, etc) or nothing (if there was such a thing as nothing). [Other aspects of cosmology are not concerned with how/why the Universe came to exist, but how it evolved.]
It's the claim that God did it.
I think making a claim is a human thing.
YHVH did not claim He did it. He simple did it, and told what He did, as He was Pleased so to do.
How can you find it ethical to claim there’s a“flaw” in
something you know nothing about?
You, sir, ain’t Jesus.The more posts anyone makes, the easier it is to see their flaw when they are opposed to Jesus.
How can you find it ethical to claim there’s a“flaw” in
something you know nothing about?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?