- Mar 28, 2005
- 21,816
- 10,795
- 76
- Country
- New Zealand
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
I can understand that. The AOG along with some other Pentecostal churches evolved out of the Holiness movements, and so retained some of the legalistic attitudes that came along with it. Consequently there was a confusion between justification and sanctification. The Wesleyan Holiness had the doctrine of entire sanctification, which was originally meant to be obtained by faith, but as has happened with many good teachings, it was corrupted later on to mean that unless a person achieved sinless perfection then his or her conversion wasn't genuine. The "smell" of that false teaching percolated through to the old time Pentecostal church and was the cause of many good people being unfairly condemned for not being able to achieve holiness as quickly as expected.I responded to an altar call in an AOG church of 350 people when I was ten.
Unfortunately I was the only one who responded That night. I remember well walking from my seat at the back past all those people to a side room at the front of the church.
May I speak frankly?
I fully agree with most of AOG doctrine.
However, a well known Baptist minister in the UK said:
85% of evangelicals do not understand the justification / sanctification process.
I find myself agreeing with him.
So I lean towards Baptist churches mainly, for they do more state this process. In the AOG church I never heard it.
I grew up crushed by my failure to be good enough for God
It wasn't until I started studying Puritan theology that I understood the difference between justification, which is by faith and remains permanently for as long as a believer believes that Jesus is the Son of God and that He rose from the dead; and sanctification which is a life-time developmental process. I also discovered that the righteousness of Christ was not something that I could obtain by holy living, but was His own righteousness that was conferred on me by the grace of God through the substitutionary work of Christ on the cross. He took my sin on Himself and clothed me with His righteousness.
I believe that the Baptist churches stem historically from the Puritan Calvinistic side of the Church, whereas the AOG comes out of the Arminian side which says that a person can be saved today, but if his holiness falls below standard then he is lost. The AOG is violently opposed to Once Saved Always Saved, and treats the doctrine as heretical. That is why when I started preaching and teaching Puritan Calvinistic doctrine, people looked me sideways and I was treated as if I was "off beam". I was never invited to be in the central circle of preachers in that church for that reason.
I left that church after 11 years, and spent time in Baptist churches, which was a wonderful experience to discover how the other half lives, and now I am an elder and lay-preacher in the Presbyterian Church. No one gives me any problems with my Charismatic/Puritan/Calvinistic theology, and quite rightly so!
Upvote
0