• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

This is a blog that needs some input from the Christian point of view (it's LONG)

Status
Not open for further replies.

wo.ai.ni

New Member
Aug 28, 2009
1
0
✟15,111.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Do you know how big the universe is?

It's huge. Consequently, shouldn't we not assume that humans are the center of everything? Isn't it selfish to claim that God (or whatever omniscient entity of extreme intelligence supposedly designed our universe) communicates solely with us, because humans are special and that this entity feels an emotion, love (which is strictly a human emotion might I add)? It's also selfish of us to claim that the creator of our universe is human (otherwise, why would he feel love? And why would there be Jesus, a human?). Do you know what's out there? What if there is another place, in another world, in another solar system, in another galaxy, in another universe, in another [word that means a group of universes] in which there is something that is beyond human? Something that completely evades the classification of either alive or dead? What if there is a third concept besides life and death? I mean, we've already sort of imagined it with zombies and walking skeletons, the so called "undead." If there is such a thing as a dead thing that is alive, for example Jesus or zombies, we have never seen it (you and I have never seen it. Others have claimed to see it thousands of years ago, doesn't mean it's true). But we may not be capable of seeing it. There could be senses we don't even know exist. Not the ability to see heat, not the ability to smell things better, no... I mean an entirely different sense altogether that our minds cannot understand due to lack of exposure to it or lack of our own senses to be able to perceive it. Could that be God? Could there be more than one God? It's a claim just as equally likely and impossible to prove.

It is to my limited understanding that God is intangible. AKA: Unable to be sensed. Therefore, saying that you can feel God is illogical. Someone once told me (when prompted with the question of how you know there is God), "I can feel Him in my heart." What? How come I can't do that? Actually, you know at one time I thought I had. But I have since dismissed it and filed it away as a case of psychological confusion; one of those things where if a person can make himself or herself believe it's true, then just maybe it really is true. I can believe the same thing about dragons. Anglo-Saxons used to write about dragons. Does that mean they were being literal? What about the disciples? And what's this I hear about the story of Jesus not being original? Why then, is his story "true" and none other is? Is it possible that there could have existed some tradition in the days of Christ that involved taking drugs? I'm not closed to that idea... several cultures are into that kind of stuff. Take the Tucano tribe from Colombia and their age old tradition of collecting and consuming yaje once a month. To them, this plant was a gift from their god and it was planted there for them, to be consumed by men to induce a hallucinogenic high during which their god was to be worshiped. I'm not joking!

If there was no threat that you would be denied access to heaven after you die, would you still believe? Many people say they would. Really? I consider my life pretty okay, and I don't force myself to go to church or read the Bible or pray... In my own opinion, it's quite a fine way to go about things. Maybe my style isn't for everyone. And maybe I would do these things more often if I had a reason, a concrete, undeniably sound reason to put myself through it. Thanks to all the explained above, I will be waiting my whole life until something happens to me where I actually believe that Christianity is the one and only religion, and all other religions can just suck it. I'm waiting for someone to get at me with something, something logical that makes sense, to make me feel like I am dead wrong. And I might as well tell you now, the following counterarguments have simply not been enough:

"I can't imagine our world not having been designed or intentionally created by something extremely intelligent, otherwise there would be no cause for the universe, and for there to be no cause for the universe is logically impossible." I can believe that. However, that does not even come close to touching upon all the other stuff that believing in Christianity entails. Not even close.

"Human beings have souls. Why? Because they say that our all of our cells die after a certain period of time, and from the time we are born to the time we are adults we are physically and biologically not the same person, we are not the same being that we had once been at one time. We have changed -- all parts of us. Yet how can we grasp that we are still the same person? You are still you, are you not? With the same memories, same personality traits? We must have something else inside of us that isn't explained scientifically." Again, not arguing with that. We may as well have a soul that carries our memories and our feelings throughout our life. Well, emotions are just chemicals. But perhaps we do have an "essence." Or it could be the transfer of information from one dying cell to the new one, to the regenerating one. I'm not a scientist, so I don't understand how that works. It could still be a possibility, and honestly, it sounds more likely to me. Either way, does that explain how Christianity is the right religion to follow? Not really, it just explains that you may or may not believe in a soul.

"There is biblical evidence." There is evidence of everything from the pre-cambrian time period to early plate tectonics to dinosaurs to microbial evolution to human evolution to early civilization to everything before Christ, too. Was that "already here" when the world was formed? Now why would an all loving God trick his creations that he supposedly cares so much for? No, it's not false, but it's not likely either and I would like to think you know that. I'm thinking about the millions of studies that have been done to show how things evolve and adapt, how landforms change from things like natural geologic disasters and how long it takes for layers of sediment to erode and form and move and mold. Add a little mathematics in there. Also add the fossil records. Which one seems likely to you?

"The Bible is not meant to be interpretted literally." Is it not? How do you know that? What was meant by these authors anyway? They couldn't have meant it as literature, could they? It's a religion! Can you really just interpret it any way you want? If you can, then great, I'm down for believing in certain aspects of it. Christianity has some great morals, I must say. A little too many gender roles, but you know... that can slide, I guess. Just imagine what the world would be like if we could follow them to a T. Which, by the way, most people do not --Christian, or non Christian.

"Just open your heart and believe in the Lord Jesus as your Savior." Hello? ...Hello? Hi. Yeah... I still have questions.

If God is listening to this right now, I wonder what he's thinking. If he's sitting there lamenting because I'm choosing to refute the likelihood of his existence, well whose fault is that? Looks to me like he should have been a little more straightforward about himself. Oh, I can hear it now... "He's right in front of you." According to me and my senses, no the [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth] he is not. And if he is, give me a reason to believe he is. Give me a legitimate reason.

This is not an attempt to make fun. I admit I add a little bit of sarcasm to some parts simply because it is tough for me to accept those particular parts as being likely or true. I hope you can sympathize. I try as hard as I can to be accepting, I really do. But I am not convinced. And I WANT you to convince me... whoever you are, I would love to be a part of your community, a part of all the fun things you guys do, and the great things that you do for hurt and helpless people is really wonderful and humanitarian. Those things I could imagine doing and would love to do, but the rest of your cause I simply do not get. I do not understand how the story of Jesus is the ONLY true explanation of the world, and I don't understand how you choose to believe it over other things. Do you ever wonder how many people who go to your youth groups or your college groups are out there livin' it up, having sex, going to parties, doing drugs, not reading the Bible, and just taking advantage of all your fun get togethers? Okay, people are not perfect. That's awesome, and it's true. But you don't even know who's going to hell and who's not anyway. It's commonly known that what you do in this life reflects what will happen to you in the next life, but according to the Bible, our entire culture is damned to go to hell! I am probably going! You might even be going! Then all the sudden... hey.... I don't see all that hope and love I was so excited about when I first joined this religion.... Could it be a control thing? A "scare you into it" type of deal, maybe to get their hands on our donations and money? "YOU ARE ALL GOING TO HELL." Every year, there is always that guy in the free speech area holding up that sign. Yes, Christians... you ARE defending that guy.... Please, I don't want to discuss that whole other issue of power and control, dating back to who knows when. Organized religion... is it your loving friend? Or a hindrance to your life?

Like many of the debates I've had before on this subject, it usually turns into me still feeling unconvinced and the convincer feeling as though there is no way to get through to me. Maybe that's the way it will always be. I'm asking someone to attempt to convince me again. If no one steps up and succeeds, then I will never be allowed to marry a Christian. I could just cheat and get baptized and then become fallen a week later. That's not genuine though. If I don't believe, I'm not saved, just lost. I'm not like the rest. I'm just a black sheep... So, I will always ask to be convinced. I'm waiting for the day... however, I will not ask God, because I feel stupid for asking questions to something I'm not quite sure is there. Wouldn't you, though? Wouldn't you feel dumb asking your dog if he knew where you put your sunglasses when you came home? Wouldn't you feel like an idiot trying to have a serious conversation with the weather? Maybe these are the wrong analogies I'm using here. I sure feel just as dumb though.

Faith is just hard to explain. And only reason it's hard is because it doesn't make sense. It's hard to explain why you believe in something so incredibly unbelievable. If I believed, I would have a hard time telling people about it, simply because I am connected to SO many people who think just the way I do now. Questioning, being skeptical, pointing out all the things that are wrong with it. Basically, doing all the things the Bible tells us NOT to do. Do NOT question us, do NOT have your own thoughts, just follow us and believe and you will be saved. How nice that sounds. But don't tell me I'm weak for not being able to endure the scrutiny and ridicule against my unbelieving peers. If you do, also tell me that if you lost your faith and you were connected to a very believing community that you wouldn't have a tough time telling them all that you've changed and you really think they're all a bunch of crazy people. I think you might go try to see someone in private about this matter. It's the same thing trying to tell your atheist friends you are now Christian. You get a lot of "What the [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth]??"'s and "You need help"s.

So... in light of all that... I just want to know how others justify their faith. What do you do with your questions? Do you ever try to answer them, or do you just ignore them and pretend like the answers are within the religion, which is... funnily enough, the very thing in question?

****
Further comments on this blog:

- "if god was a piece of rhubarb pie, would you eat him? more to the point: if jesus was a bowling ball and all the pins were apostles and the alley was all of eternity and god was the gaptoothed tweaker way in the back spraying disinfectant on the shoes, would you take a dump on the pool table and burn the whole joint down? what if god was one of us? j."

- "Bravo. Summed up perfectly. Science has already shown us where we come from. i don't understand why this is still up for debate. We know matter cannot be created or destroyed and that we, as well as every single atom making up our planet, originally came from matter that came from exploding stars. A star is essentially a matter factory, itself created of matter from somewhere else. When the star grows old and explodes it throws it's matter and all the elements it has created within itself through fusion, throughout the universe where these elements slowly coalesce into planets and other stars. And the process begins again. The Earth, and every thing on it, is composed of elements that were blown out of various stars around the universe. That includes us. And when our sun supernovas the process will begin again. There is most likely life on another planet. All it takes is the right circumstances for it to happen. It may even exist right in our own galaxy but since our level of technology doesn't allow light speed travel we'll never know. There is no invisible man watching us. If there is then it's his own fault for giving us a brain capable of reason and then not proving to us he's actually there. There may even be more than one universe which makes that term inappropriate. We'd actually be living in a multiverse."

- "i'm going to hell just by reading this...thanks;p jk no one will ever convince you god is real because religion is a test of faith and nothing else. i guess you'll just find out when you die. religion makes me feel like [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth] so i gave up on it. i tried believing in god after what i considered a near death experience but it just made me feel silly. humans just want to knw knw knw...[wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth] it. it will drive you mad. just let it go."

****

Please comment if you have thoughts.
 
Last edited:

98cwitr

Lord forgive me
Apr 20, 2006
20,020
3,474
Raleigh, NC
✟464,904.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
wow...that was really long...my only answer to you is to ask that you click the link in my sig and give me your thoughts on that...ex-atheist to atheist

edit: and don't ever look to ANYONE else to convince you God exists...I did that for most of my life and finally had to look at my own life, and not other people's lives, to find my own answer to that question. God bless...
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Please comment if you have thoughts.
Given the length of your post the comments to each point would necessarly need to be brief. If you want to follow up a particular idea it would be much better to start a thread just for that one issue.

Do you know how big the universe is?
I couldn't put a figure to it off the top of my head without looking it up, but big.

It's huge. Consequently, shouldn't we not assume that humans are the center of everything?
Perhaps, if it is just an assumtion.

Isn't it selfish to claim that God (or whatever omniscient entity of extreme intelligence supposedly designed our universe) communicates solely with us, because humans are special and that this entity feels an emotion, love (which is strictly a human emotion might I add)?
I don't see how that is selfish. If it's revealed then it's true, otherwise it's unlikely, but selfish?


It's also selfish of us to claim that the creator of our universe is human
The Judeo/Christian claim is not the creator is human, but that humanity is made in his image to be that image (i.e. represent him) in creation. And yes, that is a pretty positive statement about humanity if you compare it to the statements you find in other religous texts of similar antiquity, that claim that humanity is worthless sh.t made to do the slave work of the gods because they are lazy gits.

(otherwise, why would he feel love? And why would there be Jesus, a human?).
We love because God loves. Jesus became human to work with to do what we could not do.
Do you know what's out there? What if there is another place, in another world, in another solar system, in another galaxy, in another universe, in another [word that means a group of universes] in which there is something that is beyond human? Something that completely evades the classification of either alive or dead?
That's rather to vague to even have a hypothetical discussion about.

if there is a third concept besides life and death? I mean, we've already sort of imagined it with zombies and walking skeletons, the so called "undead." If there is such a thing as a dead thing that is alive, for example Jesus or zombies, we have never seen it (you and I have never seen it. Others have claimed to see it thousands of years ago, doesn't mean it's true).
You seem a bit confused about what Jesus' resurrection is about.


But we may not be capable of seeing it. There could be senses we don't even know exist. Not the ability to see heat, not the ability to smell things better, no... I mean an entirely different sense altogether that our minds cannot understand due to lack of exposure to it or lack of our own senses to be able to perceive it. Could that be God? Could there be more than one God? It's a claim just as equally likely and impossible to prove.
If Judeo/Christianity is just a guess, then yes - it would be pretty unlikely to be correct. But it's not - it's based on something completely unexpected and unimaginable happening to Jesus of Nazareth (already a quite extraordinary person) on easter morning.

It is to my limited understanding that God is intangible. AKA: Unable to be sensed.
That's not quite true. Rather what we can sense of God is his outpouring love that we call 'creation'. But also the presense of his Spirit can often be sensed.


Therefore, saying that you can feel God is illogical. Someone once told me (when prompted with the question of how you know there is God), "I can feel Him in my heart." What? How come I can't do that? Actually, you know at one time I thought I had. But I have since dismissed it and filed it away as a case of psychological confusion;
So you decided it can't be true, therefore it is a psychological confusion, therefore all such feelings are psychological confusions, therefore none of them are true. Can you not see the circular reasoning here?


Anglo-Saxons used to write about dragons. Does that mean they were being literal?
In the only text I've read involving anything of that sort - Beowulf - they are literal monsters in a fictional story. But that there may be other texts where they thought they were being literal factual. And other texts where the monsters are metaphoric representations of factual things. Of course, none of those would necessarly imply literal dragons exist.

What about the disciples?
What about them?


And what's this I hear about the story of Jesus not being original?
Mostly made up, I'm afraid. You can find superficial similarities to anything if you look widely enough, but when you look at the detail of what the New Testament texts are saying when they talk about Resurrection the only idea remotely like it is the Jewish idea of resurrection - that happens only at the "end of the age".

Why then, is his story "true" and none other is? Is it possible that there could have existed some tradition in the days of Christ that involved taking drugs?
If you want to look at the issue seriously, read Resurrection of the Son of God (N.T. Wright) that looks at the issue of resurrection from a truely historical perspective. I mean, you can make up any absurd hypothesis in the twinkling of an eye and it takes time to refute each one. What if Jesus was a teapot but it got messed up in translation? Such ideas don't hold water but it takes a lot of time and words to explain why not for each one. Simply slinging mud and hoping some of it will stick is not a reasonable way to carry on a serious conversation.


If there was no threat that you would be denied access to heaven after you die, would you still believe?
The question rests on a misunderstanding of what the Judeo/Christian hope really is. The Christian hope is not "believe and be wisked off to heaven when you die" by "God is putting the world to rights, has acted decisively to do so in Jesus' resurrection, and you are invited to be part of that".


Many people say they would. Really? I consider my life pretty okay, and I don't force myself to go to church or read the Bible or pray... In my own opinion, it's quite a fine way to go about things. Maybe my style isn't for everyone. And maybe I would do these things more often if I had a reason, a concrete, undeniably sound reason to put myself through it.
If you knew what God was doing to put right everything that is wrong in the world, would you want to get involved in that project?

Thanks to all the explained above, I will be waiting my whole life until something happens to me where I actually believe that Christianity is the one and only religion, and all other religions can just suck it. I'm waiting for someone to get at me with something, something logical that makes sense, to make me feel like I am dead wrong. And I might as well tell you now, the following counterarguments have simply not been enough:
If and when it happens, it may not happen the way you expect.

"I can't imagine our world not having been designed or intentionally created by something extremely intelligent, otherwise there would be no cause for the universe, and for there to be no cause for the universe is logically impossible." I can believe that. However, that does not even come close to touching upon all the other stuff that believing in Christianity entails. Not even close
Perfectly true.

"Human beings have souls. Why?
"Soul" is just a Hebrew way of talking about your whole person - your personality as well as your body.


"There is biblical evidence." There is evidence of everything from the pre-cambrian time period to early plate tectonics to dinosaurs to microbial evolution to human evolution to early civilization to everything before Christ, too. Was that "already here" when the world was formed? Now why would an all loving God trick his creations that he supposedly cares so much for? No, it's not false, but it's not likely either and I would like to think you know that. I'm thinking about the millions of studies that have been done to show how things evolve and adapt, how landforms change from things like natural geologic disasters and how long it takes for layers of sediment to erode and form and move and mold. Add a little mathematics in there. Also add the fossil records. Which one seems likely to you?

"The Bible is not meant to be interpretted literally." Is it not? How do you know that? What was meant by these authors anyway? They couldn't have meant it as literature, could they? It's a religion! Can you really just interpret it any way you want? If you can, then great, I'm down for believing in certain aspects of it. Christianity has some great morals, I must say. A little too many gender roles, but you know... that can slide, I guess. Just imagine what the world would be like if we could follow them to a T. Which, by the way, most people do not --Christian, or non Christian.
If you look at the bible it should be blantantly obvious that it contains a whole range of literary genres. Myth (in the technical sense), various ideas of historical account, parables, novellas, poetry, erotic-poetry, circular-letter, personal letter, prophesy, hymns, lamentations, proverbs, apocalyptic writing, all sorts of figures of speech,.... Pretty much the whole gamut of ancient styles of writing. One has to take each one on it's own terms with reference to others, to other similar pieces of writing, to historical information,.... In reality almost no texts every written by anyone about anything except the truely trivial are entirely literal or entirely figurative. In most cases you have both going on at the same time in the same text taken at different levels. In other words, in terms of literal vs other one approaches scriptural texts in the same way as other texts.

If God is listening to this right now, I wonder what he's thinking. If he's sitting there lamenting because I'm choosing to refute the likelihood of his existence, well whose fault is that? Looks to me like he should have been a little more straightforward about himself. Oh, I can hear it now... "He's right in front of you." According to me and my senses, no the [wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth] he is not. And if he is, give me a reason to believe he is. Give me a legitimate reason.
Maybe giving you a reason you can accept is not as straightforward as you thing. After all, if one has convinced oneself (say) that everything can be explained naturally then everything will look natural. Or the converse.


This is not an attempt to make fun. I admit I add a little bit of sarcasm to some parts simply because it is tough for me to accept those particular parts as being likely or true. I hope you can sympathize. I try as hard as I can to be accepting, I really do. But I am not convinced. And I WANT you to convince me... whoever you are, I would love to be a part of your community, a part of all the fun things you guys do, and the great things that you do for hurt and helpless people is really wonderful and humanitarian.
One curious thing is that most converts belong first, and find they come to believe later, rather than the other way around. If you find a Christian community that is attractive, I would urge you to join in. The only way to find out you can swim is to jump in the water.


Those things I could imagine doing and would love to do, but the rest of your cause I simply do not get. I do not understand how the story of Jesus is the ONLY true explanation of the world, and I don't understand how you choose to believe it over other things. Do you ever wonder how many people who go to your youth groups or your college groups are out there livin' it up, having sex, going to parties, doing drugs, not reading the Bible, and just taking advantage of all your fun get togethers?
And that would be a problem why?


Okay, people are not perfect. That's awesome, and it's true. But you don't even know who's going to hell and who's not anyway.
I hope and pray, as does Jesus, that all will see the attraction of the Kingdom of God and get on board.


It's commonly known that what you do in this life reflects what will happen to you in the next life, but according to the Bible, our entire culture is damned to go to hell! I am probably going! You might even be going! Then all the sudden... hey.... I don't see all that hope and love I was so excited about when I first joined this religion.... Could it be a control thing?
Sometimes it has, but that's the trouble with powerful stuff - it can always be perverted and abused.

But lets get the story straight - Jesus is putting the world to rights and invites everybody to enter his Kingdom. But if some refuse to do that they cannot be allowed play dog-in-the-manger forever; to hold the rest of creation to ransom.
Like many of the debates I've had before on this subject, it usually turns into me still feeling unconvinced and the convincer feeling as though there is no way to get through to me. Maybe that's the way it will always be. I'm asking someone to attempt to convince me again. If no one steps up and succeeds, then I will never be allowed to marry a Christian. I could just cheat and get baptized and then become fallen a week later.
It's been done before.

That's not genuine though. If I don't believe, I'm not saved, just lost. I'm not like the rest. I'm just a black sheep... So, I will always ask to be convinced. I'm waiting for the day... however, I will not ask God,
Sorry - you just did ;)


God bless
ebia
 
Upvote 0

Van

Contributor
Oct 28, 2004
8,956
111
California
✟9,814.00
Faith
Christian
Hi Wo.Ai.Ni, first lets deal with the Universe is really really really big. This suggests humans are not the center of everything. Does the Bible teach that humans are the center of everything? To be fair, one should conclude that our solar system was created to provide our life sustaining environment, but the Bible is silent on the possiblity that other life forms might have been created elsewhere in the Universe. So the fact that the Universe is really really really big should not hinder acceptance of Jesus.

Is love a strictly human emotion? Devotion to a person or a relative can be found in nature. My Dad's family had a dog when he was little, it was a nasty dog, and my Dad did not like "it" at all. One day when my Dad and this vicious dog were walking, my Dad, as a boy of around 9, was confronted with a rattlesnake. The stupid dog jumped in front of my dad and attacked the snake. The dog survived, barely, but the snake did not. Stupid dog.

And yes it makes no sense to claim the creator of the universe is human. I think the Bible has it the other way around, the creator of the universe took human form, but preexisted, so it was the pre-existent enity, the Word if you will, God the Son, who is the creator along with the other "persons" of the trinity.

Yes, we humans have the ability to imagine things and sometimes those imaginations hit pretty close to the mark, an apprehension of an unknown reality. Captain Kirk's communicator and the flip phones of today. But just because we can imagine a universe with no god, or with many gods, should not hinder our acceptance of the possiblity that the God of the Bible is the actual reality. For example, I watched an Angels baseball game last night, and at one point, we were down 5 runs, and so I imagined that we would lose, but I also imagined that we might come back and win the game. Assumptions about the future are just that, stuff that might be true or not.

How do you know there is a God? I sure do not. I look at the evidence and I "believe" God exists. And yes, I experence "feelings" which reinforce that "belief. Say I study a passage of scripture and conclude it means this or that. Later, I pray for God to help me understand that passage, and I study it some more. Sometimes I think I gain additional insight, something occurs to me that had not occurred before, and it makes all the difference. Now it is certainly possible I am engaging in a form of self delusion, but on the other hand, I file these experiences as reinforcement of my belief in God.

Drugs? The Bible says engaging in drugs is a sin.

If Universalism was true, everyone gets to heaven, would I still believe in God? I do not think so. But on the other hand, if I could pull folks out of hell, my loved ones, and in exchange suffer eternal punishment in hell, I might go for that. But, again according to the Bible, that is not an option either.

And finally, I think you know the Bible and the natural world provide evidence for the possiblity of God, but that evidence can be accepted or rejected. You have rejected it, but the basis of your rejection does not seem all that sound to me either.

Be the best you can be, and may God bless you.
 
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,352
Winnipeg
✟251,568.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
It's huge. Consequently, shouldn't we not assume that humans are the center of everything?

Christians, at least, do not. They believe that God, the Creator of Universe is the "center of everything." I would put to you that the atheist is far more prone to this kind of thinking than the Christian. As a consequence of believing that they exist without any purpose larger than what they can manufacture for themselves, and believing that this life is all they have, atheists tend to be very self-focused. As a natural outworking of their atheism everything they do is ultimately focused upon themselves and making their pointless life seem less so.

Isn't it selfish to claim that God (or whatever omniscient entity of extreme intelligence supposedly designed our universe) communicates solely with us, because humans are special and that this entity feels an emotion, love (which is strictly a human emotion might I add)?

Christians don't believe that God communicates solely with us. Who knows what God is doing elsewhere? He could have another world or universe in which He is doing things similar to what He is doing in this universe. Who knows? God hasn't given us any light on the subject. We know He communicates with His angels and with demons, so we know He isn't solely communicating with humans.

And Christians don't believe that love is "strictly a human emotion," either. We love God, the Bible says, because He first loved us. The notion of love arises from the Creator; the Christian, at least, obtains his understanding of what love is from the love His Creator has demonstrated toward him.

Do you know what's out there? What if there is another place...What if there is a third concept besides life and death?...If there is such a thing as...Could that be God? Could there be more than one God? It's a claim just as equally likely and impossible to prove.

That's a lot of "what if" and "could be." Anything could be possible if...

It is to my limited understanding that God is intangible. AKA: Unable to be sensed. Therefore, saying that you can feel God is illogical.

Is love tangible? Can you put it in a bottle and sell it? How about integrity? Or joy? Can these things be seen by the eye, and felt by the hands, and smelled? No, they cannot. And yet, they exist.

Someone once told me (when prompted with the question of how you know there is God), "I can feel Him in my heart." What? How come I can't do that?

Obviously because He is not there. But just because He is not present in you doesn't mean He cannot be present in another.

If there was no threat that you would be denied access to heaven after you die, would you still believe?

Why would I believe there is a Heaven and deny the existence of the One who made it? Are you really thinking through the things you are writing? So far you seem to be rather careless about your reasoning...

I'm waiting for someone to get at me with something, something logical that makes sense, to make me feel like I am dead wrong.

I very much doubt that you are. From what I've read so far, you don't seem too familiar with sound reasoning. However, if there is some truth to this statement I should tell you that the "someone" you are waiting for is God. Will He knock you flat with an astounding intellectual argument? Maybe. Maybe not. What He may use to persuade you to faith in Himself may be quite different than what you expect Him to use. Make no mistake: whatever God does to reach you, its going to involve breaking down the obvious pride you take in your capacity to think. That's going to be an adventure!

We may as well have a soul that carries our memories and our feelings throughout our life. Well, emotions are just chemicals.

So, your obvious angst about God and the Christian worldview is just "chemical"? Here I thought your upset was intellectual...

But perhaps we do have an "essence." Or it could be the transfer of information from one dying cell to the new one, to the regenerating one. I'm not a scientist, so I don't understand how that works. It could still be a possibility, and honestly, it sounds more likely to me. Either way, does that explain how Christianity is the right religion to follow? Not really, it just explains that you may or may not believe in a soul.

No Christian that I know makes the case for their faith based upon the concept of the human soul. The Bible doesn't do this. It doesn't say, "Christianity is right and true because you have a soul." Arguing against such a peculiar line of reasoning appears to be a strawman tactic, as far as I'm concerned.

"There is biblical evidence." There is evidence of everything from the pre-cambrian time period to early plate tectonics to dinosaurs to microbial evolution to human evolution to early civilization to everything before Christ, too. Was that "already here" when the world was formed? Now why would an all loving God trick his creations that he supposedly cares so much for?

The problem isn't the "evidence" but the way in which it is interpreted.

And, by the way, there has yet to be a single example in all the "millions" of bits of information that exist which indicates that the spontaneous generation of brand new, never-before-seen genetic information necessary for evolution to actually occur has ever been generated.

No, it's not false, but it's not likely either and I would like to think you know that. I'm thinking about the millions of studies that have been done to show how things evolve and adapt,

Things have been shown to adapt and mutate, but there has never been an instance of actual evolution where brand new genetic information has appeared. Without this, the belief in a general trend toward species improvement is a belief in a fairy tale.

Well, I've read enough. I think its pretty clear that you have some serious reasoning flaws. All the conjecture, sweeping generalities, strawman tactics, and plain bad logic don't motivate me to continue further. No Christian should regard what you've written as a serious challenge to their faith.

May God draw you to Himself and out of the cloud of confusion and misunderstanding in which you have settled yourself.

Peace.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

98cwitr

Lord forgive me
Apr 20, 2006
20,020
3,474
Raleigh, NC
✟464,904.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I do agree with all your points, Van, but this one: where does the Bible say engaging in drugs is a sin? I drink coffee, am I committing a sin? (...and dont take 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 as so many tend to do, because that is the context of sexual immorality and even if you did don't forget to acknowledge "All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.")
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Van

Contributor
Oct 28, 2004
8,956
111
California
✟9,814.00
Faith
Christian
Hi 98cwitr, nice to meet someone who shares the nobility of the Bereans. :)

When I used the term "drugs" I did not refer to food or drink, but to substances taken to intoxicate or hallucinate. In Galatians 5:20, the word translated as witchcraft refers to the use of "spell giving potions." The Greek word, transliterated as "pharmakeia" appears three times in the New Testament, here and in Revelation 9:21 and 18:23. Depending on your translation, the word is also translated as "sorcery."

And to provide balance, we are not talking about medications thought to take care of our body, but those that harm, such a mind-altering drugs that go against being of sober mind, and drugs intended to harm, such as a poison.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FutureAndAHope

Just me
Site Supporter
Aug 30, 2008
6,798
3,106
Australia
Visit site
✟890,392.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
From the text you have in bold I asume that you are looking for proof of Gods existance, or at least saying that we should provide some. So here is what I will do: I will provide for you my proof, things that have happened to me that prove there is a God.

One morning I got up and walked into the hall and I heard a voice say "How would you like to be stabbed in the Valley". The Valley was the rough end of town, and the voice scared me a little, I wondered if I had done something to offend God. I had planned to go down to the Valley to ask people out to church as was my habit at the time. In the end I went anyway regardless of the fear. I walked up to the first person I met and asked him if he would like to go out to church. He said to me "I am an atheist, I don't believe in God". I just said "fine", but hoped to change his mind. He then proceeded to unbutton his shirt and showed me scar marks up and down his chest and stomach. He said to me, "I was attacked by a knife wielding man in the Valley some time ago and spent months recovering in hospital, How could God allow that to happen to me". Then I knew why God had said in the morning "How would I like to be stabbed?". God understood this man, but had a good plan for him. Some weeks latter this man came out to church and became a Christian.

Some time after the second Gulf War an Australian man Douglas Wood was captured by terrorists in Iraq, who made demands for a ransom or he would be executed. I set about fasting and praying for his release, I said to God "You know where he is....tell me". Three words entered my mind ABC, Bizaar and "A-meal". I thought "I am going crazy what has all that got to do with him. Bizaar I though "this is Bizarre". I thought maybe "A-meal" is a town so I searched a map of Iraq for a town of that name, but found nothing that really matched. Some time latter Douglas Wood was freed by US troops who came across his captors. It was not until latter that I actually discovered what the three words meant. I was on a forum libertyunites.us and came across a post by a user called ABC in the post she appealed to the captors to release Douglas Wood because he had gone to a/or the Bazaar and bought food for homeless people and had provided them with "A-meal". I believe God saw this action too and blessed Douglas Wood with an escape from his captors.

One time I thought about suing some one but felt bad about it because I did not want to give a bad impression about what a Christian is like. So I prayed and asked God to show me clearly what to do. Latter that day I opened my bible at random, selecting a random verse and it opened to 1Co 6:7 "Nay, already it is altogether a defect in you, that ye have lawsuits one with another. Why not rather take wrong? why not rather be defrauded?" So I knew what God was thinking, no lawsuit. From this I don not believe God was saying all law suits are wrong just this one was.

At one point in my life I was praying for scientific cures for illnesses like cancer. Because I was on a science kick I thought would it not be fun to create a real life dinosaur. I wanted Jesus just for fun to show me how to create a Real Live Dinosaur, he can show us anything you know if he wants, but when I asked him how to start recreating a Dinosaur. Jesus spoke into my head the sentence "bood, a term I had never heard before. I decided to look it up on the Internet and I found out the following: You see, the children of Semai are taught from an early age, the concept of "bood." If a parent asks a child to do something and the child replies " bood," it means in other words, "I don't feel like doing that," and the matter is closed. Bood means gently No.

One day I was witnessing to a Muslim and he asked me why we ate pork. I used the verse out of the bible which says "It is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man but what comes out of the mouth". After some general discussion I finished for the night. I asked God to give me a verse from the bible to encourage me. I opened the bible at random and selected a random verse. It opened to the exact same verse that I had used with the Muslim. The one about food not defiling. So I knew that God was approving of what I had been talking about.
"What goes into a man's mouth does not make him 'unclean,' but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him "unclean.'"- Mat 15:11
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.